Posted on 01/01/2007 3:48:37 PM PST by NormsRevenge
NEW ORLEANS - A new report by scientists studying Louisiana's sinking coast says the land here is not just sinking, it's sliding ever so slowly into the Gulf of Mexico. The new findings may add a kink to plans being drawn up to build bigger and better levees to protect this historic city and Cajun bayou culture.
If the land is shifting even slightly engineers may need to take that into consideration as they build new levees and draw lines across the coast to identify areas that should and shouldn't be protected.
Researchers have known for years that the swampy land under south Louisiana is sinking (potholed streets and wobbly porches and floors are visible evidence of that) but a lateral movement of the land into the Gulf enters largely unstudied terrain.
The report, which appeared in December's Geophysical Research Letters, a peer-reviewed journal published by the American Geophysical Union, says the bedrock under heavily populated southeast Louisiana is breaking away at a glacial speed at the pace fingernails grow.
The southward movement, the study says, is triggered by deep underground faults slipping under the enormous weight of sediment dumped by the Mississippi River.
The slippage, though, is confined to a large egg-shaped area approximately 250 miles long and 180 miles wide that encompasses the delta of the Mississippi, which was built up by river deposits over the past 8,000 years, the report says.
The report was based on data collected between 1995 and 2006 by Global Positioning System stations installed in recent years to better understand the dynamic nature of this delta the French settled in 300 years ago.
"People should not be afraid that we're going to fall into the Gulf. That's not going to happen," said Roy Dokka, lead researcher and executive director of the Center for GeoInformatics at Louisiana State University.
He described the slide into the Gulf as "a kind of avalanche of material, except that it is happening very slowly. It moved about the width of two credit cards this year."
While that may seem trifling in the big picture, Dokka said engineers need to include this reality into their plans for levees, floodgates and other projects.
Windell Curole, a levee and hurricane expert who is on a state board developing a master protection plan, said the phenomenon of sinking, or subsidence, has not been "included in a big way" in the new plan but that planners are "aware of it."
"As we understand it better, we will include it," he said. "You have to be aware of the elevation issues and the rate these things need to be in the equation."
Flood protection planners have their work cut out for them as they choose between often competing theories about what is causing Louisiana to lose land at alarming rates. Since the 1930s, more than 2,000 square miles of coast sank or eroded.
Some scientists believe oil and natural gas extraction in the middle and late 20th century caused much of the sinking; others say the land is caving in because the Mississippi River and other waterways were straightjacketed by levees, which stopped floodwaters from replenishing the soil.
And some scientists have suggested the debate over subsidence is overstated.
Torbjorn Tornqvist, an associate professor of earth and environmental sciences at Tulane University, found much of the region surprisingly stable and the rate of sinking to be at least 10 times less than previously reported.
**FILE PHOTO** In this Dec. 17, 2003 photo released by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, land loss in the marsh around Venice, La., a fishing and oil and natural gas town near the mouth of the Mississippi River, is shown. The Mississippi River delta plain is sinking an average of half an inch a year, raising doubts about whether the state can restore its rapidly disappearing coast by mimicking nature with freshwater river diversions, according to a geologist whose theories are rankling the scientific community. (AP Photo/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers)
Send them billions of dollars!!!!!!!
The lower half of the state should just be declared a wetland.
Definitely Bush's fault.
Send giant marshmallows for the chocolate city!
They'll have to move about half of New Orleans to Baton Rouge.
So maybe "Katrina" was sort of a warning from Gaia afterall. I think the Big "Media" and their DemocRAT comrades owe my President an apology.
You can't fool mother nature. She will do what she wants to do, and only a fool would try to stop her.
That has got to be the funniest picture I have ever seen!
Is this caused by "Global Slipping"?
"The lower half of the state should just be declared a wetland."
Damn near is. Matter of fact, it's one of the reasons the levees weren't kept up the way the Corps wanted. The money tended to go to wetlands habitat preservation in addition to similar projects due to local political pandering to enviros. The squeaky wheels with big lawyers tend to get the grease. That describes enviros to a "T".
Is that a large drain in the middle of that photo or a hot tub?
OtisBerg?
Some women try to keep looking 20 when they're 70...this seems to be about the same hopeless type of venture.
Time marches on.
So, in layman's terms, Mississippi is a geological rectum and the delta is a huge hemorrhoid.
That explains why they want a "chocolate city" there...
But seriously, we can print enough dollars to fill in the Gulf of Mexico and that ought to take care of the problem.
For Corps of Engineer types from Rio Linde, it's called a delta.
New Orleans is built on river delta. There is no bedrock for hundreds of metres down. The soil is very absorbent and unstable.The level of bedrock is well below sea level. The whole New Orleans area is not solidly anchored to anything at all. It's a slow-motion mudslide going down into the sea.
It's a drain. Pretty functional, if you think about it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.