Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roberts blasts inadequate pay for judges
Seattle Post-Intelligencer ^ | December 31, 2006 | PETE YOST

Posted on 01/01/2007 7:26:14 AM PST by indcons

Pay for federal judges is so inadequate that it threatens to undermine the judiciary's independence, Chief Justice John Roberts says in a year-end report critical of Congress.

Issuing an eight-page message devoted exclusively to salaries, Roberts says the 678 full-time U.S. District Court judges, the backbone of the federal judiciary, are paid about half that of deans and senior law professors at top schools.

In the 1950s, 65 percent of U.S. District Court judges came from the practicing bar and 35 percent came from the public sector. Today the situation is reversed, Roberts said, with 60 percent from the public sector and less than 40 percent from private practice.

Federal district court judges are paid $165,200 annually; appeals court judges make $175,100; associate justices of the Supreme Court earn $203,000; the chief justice gets $212,100.

Thirty-eight judges have left the federal bench in the past six years and 17 in the past two years.

The issue of pay, says Roberts, "has now reached the level of a constitutional crisis."

"Inadequate compensation directly threatens the viability of life tenure, and if tenure in office is made uncertain, the strength and independence judges need to uphold the rule of law - even when it is unpopular to do so - will be seriously eroded," Roberts wrote.

(Excerpt) Read more at seattlepi.nwsource.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congress; govwatch; johnroberts; judgespay; judiciary; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 541-558 next last
To: indcons; TomGuy

Those are former judges turned celebs. They mediate disputes on TV shows. See what characters the "big bucks" attract?


61 posted on 01/01/2007 8:05:00 AM PST by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
You'll note the conservative judges are the ones with the smallest holdings. For someone of Thomas' age, that is very little (the typical 401K for an average engineer his age is much higher).
62 posted on 01/01/2007 8:05:17 AM PST by Timmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford
1. The free market rules. In this case, the free market has set the "price" for a top-notch legal mind significantly higher that what the gov't is willing to pay. Since when have Freepers allowed the Government to decide the market value of anything?

In a free market when a person sucks at their job .. they can be fired

Federal Judges are appointed .. not hired

63 posted on 01/01/2007 8:05:38 AM PST by Mo1 (the violence will stop when US politicians step up to the plate and act united for victory and peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: indcons
An enterprising investigative reporter (a dying breed) could easily put together the yearly incomes of these judges factoring in the benefits.....including health insurance, drivers and car allowances, pensions, dining-room food free or at reduced prices, exercise rooms and pools available to them, travel expenses, secretary, aides and other staff subsidies.......need I go on?

I would wager that their yearly income before taxes is three times the amount given out for public consumption.

Leni

64 posted on 01/01/2007 8:07:04 AM PST by MinuteGal (The Left takes power only through deception.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

In other words: "We act on behalf of the upper class, why shouldn't we be compensated accordingly?"


65 posted on 01/01/2007 8:07:30 AM PST by Wormwood (I'm with you in Rockland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford
I agree with you totally. Besides, they said they are getting most of the judges from previous government jobs instead of getting them from the general population. It would seem to me it's better to get people who have actually had to live under the laws.

And you are right, market conditions ARE applying which is why so many are leaving. They have families to raise.

66 posted on 01/01/2007 8:08:40 AM PST by McGavin999 (Don't bring what you ran away from to my home state-Freeper WatchingInAmazement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Ever heard of "IMPEACHMENT"? (Yes, they can be fired.)")


67 posted on 01/01/2007 8:08:41 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

There are other intangibles (foundation/board memberships, speaking honoria, and the like) with these positions (at least the highest ones) that don't carry a fixed/declared monetary value.

However, you make a valid point.


68 posted on 01/01/2007 8:09:09 AM PST by indcons (Fellow FReepers - Best Wishes for 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: indcons

A pay raise for federal judges does not resonate with most U.S. citizens. After all, they get paid for life, even after retiring and off the bench--full pay. They have life time appointments and don't spend a dime on getting reelected. They set their own work hours, case load and get vacation and sick leave as they wish it. They can't be kicked out of the job for most of the reasons mere mortals can.


69 posted on 01/01/2007 8:09:38 AM PST by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timmy

"Why would you ever know if a person refused the offer of an appointment? Are you the gatekeeper?"

No, I'm not the gatekeeper. I just thought that when the "short list" for a seat on the bench is reported in the media, if it was a problem of some turning down the offer because of pay we would hear about it.

If its a problem they keep it a secret?


70 posted on 01/01/2007 8:10:39 AM PST by Beagle8U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
Perhaps the argument would have merit if there was a list of those that had turned down the offer of a seat on the bench because it doesn't pay well enough? Actually there WAS a long list of judges who asked NOT to be considered for the last two vacancies.
71 posted on 01/01/2007 8:11:00 AM PST by LC HOGHEAD (Thirty years ago scientists warned about "Global Cooling" and a New Ice Age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT

"After all, they get paid for life, even after retiring and off the bench--full pay."

I did not know THAT. Thanks for the info.


72 posted on 01/01/2007 8:11:29 AM PST by indcons (Fellow FReepers - Best Wishes for 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Timmy

"Is that really your argument?"

It that really your answer to my question?

You claimed judges compete in the free market and I want to know with whom. All I'm doing is asking you to back up that assertion with a fact or two.


73 posted on 01/01/2007 8:12:19 AM PST by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: indcons

This will only work for me if the money comes from the budget of the 9th Circus Court of Appeals...


74 posted on 01/01/2007 8:13:02 AM PST by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TWohlford
How about the cheapest hair cut?

Au Contraire...I rest my case:

75 posted on 01/01/2007 8:13:40 AM PST by ErnBatavia (recent nightmare: Googled up "Helen Thomas nude"....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Judges have a much easier job than lawyers in the dreaded private sector. Judges get fantastic state and Federal pensions. Many judges are lawyers who just can't hack it in the private sector so they make the payoffs bribes ass-kissing to secure a judgeship

Say a lawyer busts his butt for 20 years. Getting a judge appointment is like semi-retirement and with a great pension awaiting you in your golden years


76 posted on 01/01/2007 8:14:26 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Some folks clean their own homes, drive cars long after paying them off, shop in bulk at Costco, shop the sales at department stores, cook their own meals in their own kitchen, etc, etc.....

Judges just need to learn how to live on what they make.


77 posted on 01/01/2007 8:15:18 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

Outsource the court to India.


78 posted on 01/01/2007 8:17:14 AM PST by cp124 (Republican=Conservative Lite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
So, that means a senior-level judge might have the income of a household with a couple of low- to mid-level government bureaucrat supervisors.

Which also means that senior Congressmen and Senators have the income of a household of low to mid-level bureaucrats. Horrors.

That's also one income exceeding that of two low to mid-level government bureaucrat supervisiors. Don't you think that judge's spouses are allowed to work?

79 posted on 01/01/2007 8:18:00 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
US Supreme Court packed with millionaires

Pretty much says it all. Most Supreme Court Justices have had years of private practice and/or law school professorships behind them before they even get into the judging game. There are some exceptions, who have made government service their careers, like Justice Thomas, but these too know the salary when they accept the nominations. Anyone who thinks becoming a federal judge is the road to riches, I don't want anywhere near a bench.

80 posted on 01/01/2007 8:18:50 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 541-558 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson