Skip to comments.
FCC approves AT&T's buyout of BellSouth
Yahoo! News ^
| December 29, 2006
| JOHN DUNBAR
Posted on 12/29/2006 2:52:06 PM PST by El Conservador
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Ma Bell's coming back!!!
To: El Conservador
so, what was the point in busting them up to begin with?
2
posted on
12/29/2006 3:04:04 PM PST
by
Kewlhand`tek
(When you take things in backwards, everything comes out backwards.---Savage)
To: El Conservador
"Among the conditions offered by AT&T is a promise to observe "network neutrality" principles"
In other words, AT&T had to offer to bend over to any sexually confused individuals that happen their way.
3
posted on
12/29/2006 3:05:44 PM PST
by
vetsvette
(Bring Him Back)
To: El Conservador
Twenty dollar DSL is pretty cheap. Look for it to zoom up after thirty months.
4
posted on
12/29/2006 3:18:41 PM PST
by
gcruse
(http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
To: Kewlhand`tek
so, what was the point in busting them up to begin with?The government saw a way in which the people could pay more for phone service.
5
posted on
12/29/2006 3:48:53 PM PST
by
taxesareforever
(Never forget Matt Maupin)
To: El Conservador
6
posted on
12/29/2006 3:57:01 PM PST
by
reg45
To: Kewlhand`tek
so, what was the point in busting them up to begin with?To make Teddy Kennedy happy.
7
posted on
12/29/2006 3:58:06 PM PST
by
reg45
To: El Conservador
The only way I could get ATT to stop internet service and taking money out of my account was to have my credit card number changed. They suck.
8
posted on
12/29/2006 3:58:42 PM PST
by
KyHammer
(Go Cats)
To: El Conservador
9
posted on
12/29/2006 4:15:14 PM PST
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: El Conservador
I wonder if Judge Green is still alive. He's the one who ordered the breakup of AT&T years ago.
10
posted on
12/29/2006 4:18:16 PM PST
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: El Conservador
LOL
Had to bring back 3000 outsouced jobs, only to later say, 10,000 more will be laid off.
Over the last 6 years, the telecom industry had laid off over 60% of its workforce. And for those folks finding another job can be difficult, at best.
11
posted on
12/29/2006 4:18:52 PM PST
by
ASOC
(The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
To: Kewlhand`tek
so, what was the point in busting them up to begin with? For abusing their monopoly. It's time to bust 'em up again.
12
posted on
12/29/2006 4:29:57 PM PST
by
HAL9000
(Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
To: Kewlhand`tek
So antitrust lawyers could make lots of dinero, of course.
13
posted on
12/29/2006 4:39:50 PM PST
by
SAJ
(debunking myths about markets and prices on FR since 2001)
To: HAL9000
To: plain talk
Their ILEC PSTN monopoly.
15
posted on
12/29/2006 5:13:03 PM PST
by
HAL9000
(Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
To: Kewlhand`tek
so, what was the point in busting them up to begin with?
Same question I had. How much money did we spend on the government witchhunt against the AT&T monopoly, only to see it re-building itslef!!
This is absurd.
16
posted on
12/29/2006 6:36:23 PM PST
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: KyHammer
re:ATT-They suck.Ditto for Bellsouth. I don't have enough time to tell you about the horror show in this part of Orlando. I dropped landlines altogether for three reasons:
1. Lower overall cost and no network connection fee, (The Al Gore Tax.)
2. Rude and vindictive Bellsouth technical staff
3. The inability of Bellsouth to deliver constant reliable landline phone service to our house; (that's right, you read that correctly.)
17
posted on
12/29/2006 6:44:52 PM PST
by
Banjoguy
(The words "Democrat" and democratic are not interchangable.)
To: HAL9000
What monopoly? You're a decade or so behind the times.
To: DustyMoment
How much money did we spend on the government witchhunt against the AT&T monopoly, only to see it re-building itslef!! Recall that this AT&T is actually one of the Baby Bells.
The one-time Southwestern Bell acquired AT&T and appropriated the name.
19
posted on
12/29/2006 6:54:19 PM PST
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: plain talk
You're a decade or so behind the times. Not at all. Right now, in 2006, AT&T has a vast natural monopoly on wireline communications in many service areas.
20
posted on
12/29/2006 7:01:48 PM PST
by
HAL9000
(Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson