Posted on 12/28/2006 12:26:53 PM PST by InvisibleChurch
As the human population continues to multiply -- and our biological footprint on the planet becomes larger -- so do all the things associated with us, including our livestock, says the New York Times.
For example, according to a new report by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations:
At present, there are about 1.5 billion cattle and domestic buffalo and about 1.7 billion sheep and goats in the world. Global livestock grazing and feed production use 30 percent of the land surface of the planet. Livestock -- which consume more food than they yield -- also compete directly with humans for water. But what is even more striking, and alarming, are their effects on the environment:
Livestock are responsible for about 18 percent of the global warming effect, more than transportation's contribution. The culprits are methane -- the natural result of bovine digestion -- and the nitrogen emitted by manure. Deforestation adds to the effect; the drive to expand grazing land destroys more biologically sensitive terrain, rain forests especially, than anything else. There are no easy trade-offs when it comes to global warming -- such as cutting back on cattle to make room for cars, says the Times. The human passion for meat is certainly not about to end anytime soon. Our health and the health of the planet depend on pushing livestock production in more sustainable directions.
Source: Editorial, "Meat and the Planet," New York Times, December 27, 2006.
For text:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/27/opinion/27wed4.html
For full report:
http://www.virtualcentre.org/en/library/key_pub/longshad/A0701E00.pdf
For more on Environment Issues:
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=31
KIO - I just about died laughing when I saw your post. Then, I looked more closely, and thought to myself, of course - it has to be a Freeper like KarlInOhio. ;-)
Are you so benighted as to be unaware that out of that planet-killing 18% of Global Warming caused by the domestication and eating (ugh) of livestock, fully 4.3% is scientifically attributable to the common domestic reindeer?
Did you not know that members of ethnic groups such as the Lapps, that traditionally consume large amounts of reindeer meat and reindeer byproducts, all die? OK, that alone wouldn't be so bad. But Women, Children, and Members of Federally Protected Minority Groups who live with them and consume reindeer products will also all die. They will still all die even if they were just visiting, you heartless plutocrat!
Enjoy your little Prancer und Dancer canapés with the other Republicans at your exclusive club. But stop and ask yourselves this question:
...was it this blasé attitude toward the epic human tragedy surrounding reindeer consumption that cost the Republicans the last elections?
Definitely. The chart in post 35 proves it beyond the shadow of a doubt. It also proves that this thread is George Bush's fault.
Mmmmm...Reindeer Tenderloin. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.