Skip to comments.
Discovery of Constant, Sun Spot Induced, Harmless 1500 Years Global Warming Cycles
LifeSiteNews ^
| 12/22/06
| Steve Jalsevac
Posted on 12/26/2006 10:36:26 AM PST by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
To: wagglebee
41
posted on
12/26/2006 12:45:34 PM PST
by
JOAT
To: djf; DaveLoneRanger; cogitator
I suppose a mitigating factor in that calculation would be the word "roughly" prior to the "1500 years."
42
posted on
12/26/2006 12:46:04 PM PST
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(“Don’t overestimate the decency of the human race.” —H. L. Mencken)
To: wagglebee
Sooner or later someone will debunk the hole chlorofluorocarbon (CFC/freon) hole in the ozone layer scam that caused world economies to needlessly waste billions of dollars, and Al Gore's stupidity will then be completely revealed.
43
posted on
12/26/2006 1:01:31 PM PST
by
DJ Taylor
(Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
To: wagglebee
Mostly they want us to be firghtened so that the spineless government will give them more research funding thus claiming they are doing something about the "problem". It is a scam. FOLLOW THE MONEY!!!
44
posted on
12/26/2006 1:01:47 PM PST
by
Laserman
To: rocksblues
I hope hundreds of right thinking consevatives make sure they see this report and ask them to please explain why they do not accept it!!!
45
posted on
12/26/2006 1:05:37 PM PST
by
Laserman
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I suppose a mitigating factor in that calculation would be the word "roughly" prior to the "1500 years."I guess we'll be seeing this one making the skeptic rounds a few times before it fades away:
Avery and Singer: Unstoppable Hot Air
To: wagglebee
Avery and Singer will soon be stoned.
47
posted on
12/26/2006 1:23:49 PM PST
by
TASMANIANRED
(All I want for Christmas is a new tag line.)
To: wagglebee
The problem with the sunspot theory is that it doesn't justify the dismantling of capitalism and the imposition of global Socialism. Therefore it is "inconvenient".
To: wagglebee
49
posted on
12/26/2006 1:26:32 PM PST
by
LayoutGuru2
(Know the difference between honoring diversity and honoring perversity? No? You must be a liberal!)
To: wagglebee
Senator Snowe wants so-called "skeptic" authors such as these to be BANNED. Take note, Maine voters.
To: A. Pole
To: DJ Taylor
Sooner or later someone will debunk the hole chlorofluorocarbon (CFC/freon) hole in the ozone layer scamFat chance of that happening.
Stratospheric Ozone: An Electronic Textbook
Your assignment: determine all the factual errors in this Electronic Textbook.
To: djf
When a cycle is irregular and varies from 1000 to 2000, it is reasonable to refer to it as "about 1500". Many might say "averages 1500", scientists would normally say "about 1500 +- 500".
If the article had included a few hundred data points, the meaning would have been more clear.
53
posted on
12/26/2006 1:46:50 PM PST
by
3niner
(War is one game where the home team always loses.)
To: wagglebee
A recent conversation with one of our young, very liberal, but intelligent engineers went something like this:
Him: Well, what do you think causes global warming?
Me: The Sun.
Him: [After a long moment of silence.] I mean what causes the changes we've seen recently.
Me: The heat we receive from the Sun is not constant, it doesn't need to change very much to make a difference on Earth. The fact that Mars has been undergoing global warming at the same time as the Earth, suggest a common cause.
Him: [Quietly.] Mars is getting warmer?
Me: Yes.
Him: I didn't know that. I'll have to learn more about that.
I hardly think I converted him in one conversation, but I've started to get him to think. His education has been very narrow, and he has the skills to broaden it, if he can be motivated to do so.
Since I have breakfast with this kid about once or twice a week, I have recurring opportunities to test his knowledge, attitudes, etc., and give him nudges.
If we all just keep working on the ignorant, as opportunities present, we can change (or open) a lot of minds (eventually).
54
posted on
12/26/2006 2:12:56 PM PST
by
3niner
(War is one game where the home team always loses.)
To: larryjohnson
Every time I have talked to him he has become more convinced that the truth is not a part of the search among the alarmists and he has to be ever more cautious even in his criticism of obvious errors, but he is a dogged sort and I know that he is not going to author or sign on to anything which he believes is not testable.
55
posted on
12/26/2006 2:23:04 PM PST
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: djf
Do yourself a favor and read the link and then read the book - Singer does not lie.
56
posted on
12/26/2006 2:24:14 PM PST
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
What if Fred is wrong, and SCOTUS declares CO2 a pollutant???
57
posted on
12/26/2006 2:38:34 PM PST
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: cogitator
You seriously are linking this to discredit what Singer has published?
Go back and read this link, where is the science here?
Boy, you're ridin' the wrong horse.
58
posted on
12/26/2006 2:42:29 PM PST
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: cogitator
The general location, size and time of occurence have changed only by small degrees each year since first measured in 1948; the numbers of skin cancers have not been calamitous at any time and the hole is not "closing up."
Overall, since 1985 when all the noise started, the one thing that has changed is that people no longer listen - they think it has been fixed!
I am beginning to think you have a dog in this fight.
59
posted on
12/26/2006 2:48:42 PM PST
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: chopperman; djf
Your criticism assumes the time of grape growing in England in the 1st and 11th centuries represents the peaks of the 1500 year cycle. The cyclical peak may have been well before the 1st century AD, bottomed out sometime in the Dark Ages and peaked again after the 11th century.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson