Replies

Did the Committee review any of the 20-some security videos that the FBI took from cameras in the vicinity of the Murrah Building?

Most of those videos have never been shown. Why not? Do they show more than the 'official' story?

When the Murrah bombing first hit the news, most of the networks were specualating foreign terrorism. Within an hour, that story changed to speculation of home-grown terrorists. (Was that when Jamie Gorelick put out the word to drop references to foreign terrorists?) President Clinton could not allow that foreign terrorists attacked mid-America on his watch (he already had WTC 1 attack on his watch), so he had to make sure that the attackers were ONLY home-grown white boys and that Rush Limbaugh was the cause of public anxiety. If the Murrah bombing reports implicated foreigner terrorists attacking America's heartland unabated, Clinton's presidency would have been over. He had to cover it up and Jamie Gorelick was the one charged with the task.

The shift of FBI and White House (Clinton) attention away from searching for the swarthy-complexioned man that accompanied McVeigh in parking the Ryder truck bomb was so abrupt and logically unjustified that it took my breath away, figuratively speaking. But it allowed B. J. Clinton to avoid having to take punitive action, possibly even military action against the perpetrators or their (in my mind Islamic terrorist) backers. It is evident to me that he was determined that on his watch no U.S. military person would be sent into harms way and potential KIA status in defense of the vital security interests or survival of the U. S. (In this I believe he succeeded). The citizen militias provided a ready-made target for vilification and suspicion, a group of citizens that had failed to vote for Clinton, precisely as the Columbine high school shooting gave him an opportunity to demonize members of the Nat'l Rifle Association and lawful citizen gun owners generally, another group that had declined to vote for him but had no culpablity whatsoever in the Columbine tragedy.

Your post is probably the most clear and probable explanation I have seen, and exactly what I have thought from the beginning. I remember those sketches of John Doe that looked like a ME'ster.

And, I might add, the whole "Republican Revolution" was turned back and blunted in it's momentum at all levels of government. Here in CA we took the state assembly majority for the first time in many decades and even conservative County Supervisors elected in 1994 were spurned. Some up north were even recalled for being too radically conservative.

Billy Clinton was exactly like Barney Fife. He said: "Jamie! (instead of Andy) We gotta nip these conservatives and their ground-swell in the bud! In the BUD, I tell ya!! Git-er-DONE!!!" (and she did)

Did the Committee review any of the 20-some security videos that the FBI took from cameras in the vicinity of the Murrah Building? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

They did not review those tapes on the record. If you want a thorough forensic analysis of what DID happen,visit the link below.

It looks very, very suspicious. I believe there was a cover up, and that it involved a bungled operation. They let McVeigh and his foreign helpers get too far without stopping them.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/ok.html