Skip to comments.
The Conservative Case Against Rudy Giuliani
Right wing news ^
| none
| none listed
Posted on 12/20/2006 8:29:40 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-156 next last
To: Alberta's Child
...terrorism pales in comparison to abortion as a threat to this country's existence.
I disagree. Terrorism is a greater threat to our existence. Abortion is a greater threat to our soul.
To: calcowgirl
"That is not the critical factor. And what's important to me is to have a very intelligent, very honest, very good lawyer on the court. And he fits that category, in the same way Justice Ginsburg fit that category." Did he know that he was talking about someone who is an avowed communist and an ardent supporter of the ACLU's political agenda?
82
posted on
12/20/2006 2:00:16 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Did you hear about Hillary? She is crooked and shrillery!
Between her eyes,
Socialism Lies.
But between ITS thighs,
The smell draws flies!
83
posted on
12/20/2006 2:01:01 PM PST
by
airborne
(MERRY CHRISTMAS!!! Jesus is the reason for the season!!)
To: HaveHadEnough
Terrorism is a greater threat to our existence. Abortion is a greater threat to our soul. Oh, please. "Terrorism" was able to kill 3,000 Americans in an attack of historic proportions on 9/11. That's less than the average death toll in this nation's abortion clinics for one day.
Even the government of New York City stopped taking terrorism seriously not too long after 9/11 -- and now considers firearms, second-hand smoke, and trans-fats to be the biggest threats its residents face today.
84
posted on
12/20/2006 2:03:29 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: Alberta's Child
If you think our losses to terrorism amount to the deaths on 9/11 or that terrorists do not seek the entire destruction of our way of life you are mistaken.
To: areafiftyone
No one should, beside I have always said that the real opponents are not "social conservatives" or "fiscal conservatives" or a combination thereof, but those whom want to DESTROY the Conservative Coalition (this includes the media, liberals, and yes-liberal republicans whom dislike one faction of the republican party over another)..
Most don't fit in this category, but some have been persuaded to go along with it by the media, etc..
86
posted on
12/20/2006 2:11:32 PM PST
by
JSDude1
(www.pence08.com)
To: HaveHadEnough
What the heck is "our way of life" anyway? Whenever I hear some leftist moron like Michael Bloomberg make the claim that "They [terrorists] hate our way of life," I find myself wondering if I don't hate his definition of "our way of life," too.
87
posted on
12/20/2006 2:13:05 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: airborne
Not bad but I could not finish the ditty while throwing up!
88
posted on
12/20/2006 2:17:49 PM PST
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
To: alloysteel
"He started a program to put Arabic speakers on a fast track for promotions. "
I could see getting proficiency pay but not jumped above people that may well be better!
So you say he is a raciest!
Nope Never Nada.
89
posted on
12/20/2006 2:25:06 PM PST
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
To: hosepipe
Can't do that.. Atheism and secular humanism are both religious..Why not?
90
posted on
12/20/2006 2:30:59 PM PST
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: Alberta's Child
Even in purely mathematical terms, terrorism pales in comparison to abortion as a threat to this country's existence. Yeah, let's just ignore terrorism and all terrorist threats, because they are so statistically insignificant in purely mathematical terms, of course. /mega-sarc/
Admit it, you didn't pay your heating bill, 'cuz you hate "our way of life", and you now have brain freeze.Go cut some firewood and thaw out.
To: calcowgirl
GIULIANI: Sure. That's be exactly the kind of person you'd think that you'd want to appoint, somebody who shares kind of your general outlook,In short, Giulaini is likely to appoint SCOTUS justices with the philosophical outlook of a Ginsberg.
A fat clue right from his own rabidly socially liberal mouth.
92
posted on
12/20/2006 3:32:47 PM PST
by
JCEccles
To: muleskinner
Terrorism has killed thousands. Social liberalism has killed tens of millions, and all their progeny.
The math isn't difficult.
93
posted on
12/20/2006 3:34:40 PM PST
by
JCEccles
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
I thought that Rudy called for the Administration to follow the Baker Commission's recommendations, including a phased withdrawl.
To: tacticalogic
[ Can't do that.. Atheism and secular humanism are both religious.. / Why not? ]
Both religion and government enforce morality..
They are reciprocal to one another.. two sides of the same coin..
No matter how liberal or authoritarian they are
95
posted on
12/20/2006 5:24:37 PM PST
by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole)
To: JCEccles; Alberta's Child; calcowgirl
All of the above indicates that Giulianni would find Ginsberg to be an ideal SCOTUS nominee.
Remember when the president nominated Harriet Miers? This place reeked of bitterness and feelings of betrayal. It had republicans at each other's throats. Just imagine how much worse it would be if the president nominated a Ginsberg!
96
posted on
12/20/2006 5:39:46 PM PST
by
FreeInWV
To: DungeonMaster
He's a liberal. Case closed.Darn right, he's a liberal but don't put it past the stupidity of the American public to vote him in. Could happen and that's scary.
To: hosepipe
Both religion and government enforce morality..
They are reciprocal to one another..
two sides of the same coin..
No matter how liberal or authoritarian they areThat sounds like an assertion that there is no such thing as a not-theocratic goverment, and that we should abandon the idea that we can have one and resign ourselves choosing a theology.
98
posted on
12/20/2006 7:17:46 PM PST
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: areafiftyone
"NYC was a crime ridden hell hole and you were afraid to walk at night."
Probably because NYC has laws that prohibit effective personal defense. You do know why the Sullivan Act was enacted and who it protected, right?
To: tacticalogic
[ That sounds like an assertion that there is no such thing as a not-theocratic government, and that we should abandon the idea that we can have one and resign ourselves choosing a theology. ]
It does doesn't it..
Kind of hard to beat the Jews theocratic government of old.. where every seven years ALL debts(of any kind) were automatically forgiven(and more) and every fifty years ALL lands was returned to its original owners(and more)..
100
posted on
12/20/2006 8:30:37 PM PST
by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-156 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson