Skip to comments.
Minnesota court rules BB gun is a firearm
St. Paul Pioneer Press ^
| SHANNON PRATHER
Posted on 12/15/2006 11:50:17 PM PST by neverdem
A convicted felon barred from carrying a firearm broke the law when he started toting a BB gun, the Minnesota Court of Appeals has ruled.
John Fleming Jr. couldn't legally carry a gun because of two felony assault convictions, so he packed a BB gun instead.
Ramsey County prosecutors decided Fleming was splitting hairs and charged him with unlawful possession of a firearm.
Fleming won when a Ramsey County District judge threw out the charge, ruling the statute doesn't apply to BB guns. But the appeals court ruled prosecutors could again take aim at the two-time felon.
The appellate court reinstated the charge against Fleming, finding that a firearm is "any gun from which a shot or a projectile is discharged by means of explosive, gas or compressed air."
Fleming is accused of carrying a black metal BB gun that discharges a pellet by means of a CO2 cartridge.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: 2stupid4words; banglist; bbguns; firearm; stupidjudges
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Two felony assault convictions and the question is whether a BB gun is a firearm. I don't see any fire, just a potential weapon. This might get interesting.
Type of rifle that killed girl ID'd by police But there should be no excuse for premeditated muder.
1
posted on
12/15/2006 11:50:20 PM PST
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
If a BB gun is a firearm under the law, that has far-reaching consequences beyond just this case. The courts should think long and hard about that, since it's totally bogus and unfair to have "firearm" mean different things in different situations.
2
posted on
12/15/2006 11:54:38 PM PST
by
sourcery
To: neverdem
"You'll put yer eye out, and go to jail, too, kid..."
3
posted on
12/15/2006 11:56:57 PM PST
by
WestVirginiaRebel
(Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
To: neverdem
Well they can't say it's a firearm that would mean it has to be treated and sold like a real gun.
4
posted on
12/15/2006 11:57:06 PM PST
by
miliantnutcase
("If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it." -ichabod1)
To: neverdem
Pure nonsense. There is no fire, so there is no firearm.
Slingshots will be next.
5
posted on
12/15/2006 11:59:18 PM PST
by
Manic_Episode
(Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
To: neverdem
Would a bow and arrow be considered a "firearm"? A crossbow?
6
posted on
12/16/2006 12:01:16 AM PST
by
garyhope
(It's World War IV, right here, right now courtesy of Islam.)
To: neverdem
"Ramsey County prosecutors decided Fleming was splitting hairs and charged him with unlawful possession of a firearm. ..."The appellate court reinstated the charge against Fleming, finding that a firearm is "any gun from which a shot or a projectile is discharged by means of explosive, gas or compressed air."
Tha Appelate court has no grounds in the law to do this. I'm sure the MN legislaturre doesn't classify bb guns as a firearm and neither do the feds. stinkin' liberals!
7
posted on
12/16/2006 12:04:45 AM PST
by
spunkets
To: neverdem
Taken to its logical conclusion, any solid object - a rock - can be considered a firearm.
Trouble is, where is the "fire" in the BB-gun firearm?
8
posted on
12/16/2006 12:14:08 AM PST
by
Lexinom
To: Manic_Episode
They'll can have my pea shooter when they pry it from my cold, dead lips.
9
posted on
12/16/2006 12:21:39 AM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(Barack Hussein Obama)
To: neverdem
The appellate court reinstated the charge against Fleming, finding that a firearm is "any gun from which a shot or a projectile is discharged by means of explosive, gas or compressed air." spitballs!
To: Manic_Episode
Slingshots will be next.And rope.
11
posted on
12/16/2006 1:11:26 AM PST
by
Cobra64
(Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
To: Jeff Chandler
12
posted on
12/16/2006 1:13:59 AM PST
by
RichRepublican
(Some days you're the windshield--some days you're the bug.)
To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
I guess as a child I and my friends were an armed militia and engaged in gun battles, and we just thought we were playing with our BB-guns. Our firecrackers are probably also now considered bombs
"discharged by means of explosive, gas or compressed air."... By this definition my A$$ could be a firearm!
If we let them take away our BB-guns they'll come for our knives next, and then we'll be stuck eating our steak with nothing but spoons and forks!
13
posted on
12/16/2006 1:24:48 AM PST
by
ME-262
(The Democrat party is slowly reduced by Abortion, AIDS, Imprisonment, and China's one child policy.)
To: neverdem
PUT OUT AN APB ON THIS BB GUN WIELDING THUG!!!!
14
posted on
12/16/2006 1:43:52 AM PST
by
kb2614
(Hell hath no fury than a bureaucrat scorned)
To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
The appellate court reinstated the charge against Fleming, finding that a firearm is "any gun from which a shot or a projectile is discharged by means of explosive, gas or compressed air." spitballs!
Exactly! Spitballs are projectiles discharged (explosively) by compressed air. According tho this wacky judge, such things that have nothing to do with fire are "firearms."
Continuing this illogical definition of "firearms," hairspray, other household sprays, fire extinguishers, yogurt at high altitude, pressurized soft drink cans, and living animals all discharge projectiles by means of compressed air/gas. Would this judge categorize all these as "firearms?" Maybe he needs a dictionary.
15
posted on
12/16/2006 1:44:40 AM PST
by
heleny
To: heleny
Maybe he needs a dictionary.You are right.
16
posted on
12/16/2006 2:12:26 AM PST
by
KarinG1
(Opinions expressed in this post are my own and do not necessarily represent those of sane people.)
To: kb2614
Who Knew the Kid was a right wing second amendment believing extremist.
Who reminded you more of a liberal; the bully's little toady, the kid who stuck himself to the flagpole, or the kid who liked the tin man?
17
posted on
12/16/2006 2:14:25 AM PST
by
ME-262
(The Democrat party is slowly reduced by Abortion, AIDS, Imprisonment, and China's one child policy.)
To: ME-262
"Who Knew the Kid was a right wing second amendment believing extremist."
I KNEW that I always liked that kid!
"Who reminded you more of a liberal; the bully's little toady, the kid who stuck himself to the flagpole, or the kid who liked the tin man?"
The Union Stevedores that delivered the dad's "major award"! :-)
LLS
18
posted on
12/16/2006 3:19:59 AM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
To: kb2614
19
posted on
12/16/2006 3:34:07 AM PST
by
rawcatslyentist
(When true genius appears, know him by this sign: all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.)
To: Cobra64
Don't laugh; right now in the enlightened U.K. they're in the process of banning swords and knives with points.
Got Ginsu? Turn them all in, mate.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson