Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Fascist] Pelosi Targets Grassroots Freedom of Speech
Human Events ^ | Dec 18, 2006 | Amanda B. Carpenter

Posted on 12/15/2006 6:03:14 PM PST by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-351 next last
To: onyx; All

If I remember to do it that is..


41 posted on 12/15/2006 6:27:09 PM PST by KevinDavis (Nancy you ignorant Slut!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
The democrat' have the MSM to spout their agenda.
By shutting down the republicans they are in effect turning
back the clock when they (MSM) controled the election propaganda. /imo

And here we go.

42 posted on 12/15/2006 6:27:09 PM PST by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; onyx

I didn't give up!!!!! It just took me a long time to start over!!!...I'am here!!!


43 posted on 12/15/2006 6:27:33 PM PST by GitmoSailor (Diana We love you in AZ! ........ IREY will be Back Jack!!!.............COLD WAR VET.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: outofstyle
Why do "lawmakers" feel like they must constantly make laws?

Why do plumbers always have to find more leaks in your plumbing?

44 posted on 12/15/2006 6:27:55 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joan_Claybrook

Joan Claybrook is an American lawyer who has served as President of Public Citizen since 1982. Previously, she was head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in the Carter administration from 1977 to 1981. [1]


45 posted on 12/15/2006 6:31:11 PM PST by Mo1 (Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; ...
"The legislation would make changes to the legal definition of “grassroots lobbying” and require any organization that encourages 500 or more members of the general public to contact their elected representatives to file a report with detailed information about their organization to the government on a quarterly basis."





Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
46 posted on 12/15/2006 6:31:49 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/optimism_nov8th.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

There's no bill yet, just rhetoric. I'm just not panicked about this stuff.

We have at least 41 good senators, and we can use the filibuster just as well as the rats did.


47 posted on 12/15/2006 6:32:18 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

I bet it is. It was my first thought while reading the article.


48 posted on 12/15/2006 6:32:26 PM PST by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
they are positive they are right and we are wrong.

You give them WAY too much credit in their thought process.

49 posted on 12/15/2006 6:32:37 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; All
Here it is!

Complete listing of US Senate and Rep contact information. Keep the First Amendment!

My, my, it is truly "here we go again" time. The beast NEVER sleeps!

50 posted on 12/15/2006 6:33:07 PM PST by onyx (Phillip Rivers, LT and the San Diego Chargers! WOO-HOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS; All

If they ever think...


51 posted on 12/15/2006 6:33:17 PM PST by KevinDavis (Nancy you ignorant Slut!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis; onyx

Who on FR was happy that the 'Rats won?

I can see where Republicans lost, but who in the world would be happy about Nazi Pelosi and Reid sitting where they are?


52 posted on 12/15/2006 6:33:25 PM PST by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I think that would be Unconstitutional.


53 posted on 12/15/2006 6:33:43 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rjp2005
any organization that encourages 500 or more members of the general public to contact their elected representatives

500? That's not enough to win a school board election! Nancy isn't even being subtle about trying to establish a Police State, is she?

54 posted on 12/15/2006 6:34:15 PM PST by You Dirty Rats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
There's no bill yet, just rhetoric. I'm just not panicked about this stuff.

I doubt something like this would pass, however it does worry me. Something like this should not even be up for debate in America.
55 posted on 12/15/2006 6:35:20 PM PST by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

Let's see if some of them show up. I'd hate to be 'nasty'....lol.


56 posted on 12/15/2006 6:35:58 PM PST by onyx (Phillip Rivers, LT and the San Diego Chargers! WOO-HOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

You mean like the "Campaign Reform Law"?


57 posted on 12/15/2006 6:36:23 PM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
The Oh So Ethical Nancy Pelosi Is Fined For PAC Violations

If there is one thing Nancy Pelosi should be an expert on, besides the hazards of excessive plastic surgery, it should be ethics.

For lest we forget, she was fined $21,000 by the Federal Election Commission, just a little over two years ago:

FEC Home Page

For Immediate Release
March 26, 2004

AFFILIATED LEADERSHIP PACS FINED

WASHINGTON — The Federal Election Commission (FEC) has resolved a number of allegations concerning contributions made and received by two affiliated committees, PAC to the Future and Team Majority, leadership PACs that are associated with Representative Nancy Pelosi (D - CA). The FEC has entered into conciliation agreements with PAC to the Future and Team Majority, and three campaigns that were recipients of excessive contributions.

The conciliation agreements resulted in total civil penalties of $28,000. PAC to the Future and Team Majority will pay $21,000, Julie Thomas for Congress Campaign Committee (D - IA) and Van Hollen for Congress (D - MD) will each pay $2,500, and Joe Turnham for Congress (D - AL) will pay $2,000. The three campaigns have also agreed to disgorge $5,000 each to the U.S. Treasury.

The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) states that committees that are established, financed, maintained, or controlled by the same person or group of persons are "affiliated committees." Contributions made to or by such committees shall be considered to have been made to or by a single committee. Under the FECA, a multicandidate PAC is limited to receiving $5,000 per calendar year from individual contributors. Further, a candidate may only accept $5,000 per election from a multicandidate PAC. If a committee accepts contributions that exceed these limits, its treasurer must either refund the excessive contributions or seek redesignation to another election or reattribution to another donor within sixty days.

According to the conciliation agreement with PAC to the Future and Team Majority, the PACs failed to identify themselves as affiliated with each other when they registered with the FEC, and both PACs made contributions to several candidates for the 2002 General Election, which, when aggregated, exceeded their shared $5,000 contribution limit . The PACs also received contributions from individuals that exceeded their shared $5,000 contribution limit and did not refund the excessive portion of contributions within 60 days.

The investigation stemmed from a complaint filed by Kenneth F. Boehm, Chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center.


58 posted on 12/15/2006 6:36:31 PM PST by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

If President Bush signs this into law, its hasta la vista to the Republican party.


59 posted on 12/15/2006 6:37:02 PM PST by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (All the horns of the wicked also will I cut off; but the horns of the righteous shall be exalted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
We have at least 41 good senators, and we can use the filibuster just as well as the rats did.

But W would sign it in a heartbeat just as he signed McCain Feingold, and that Rasputin in the West Wing aka Karl Rove would urge him to sign it.

60 posted on 12/15/2006 6:37:47 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Karl Rove isn't magnificent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-351 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson