Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Fascist] Pelosi Targets Grassroots Freedom of Speech
Human Events ^ | Dec 18, 2006 | Amanda B. Carpenter

Posted on 12/15/2006 6:03:14 PM PST by Jim Robinson

House Speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi (D.-Calif.) has pledged to take up a lobbying reform proposal that would impose new regulations on speech by grassroots organizations, while providing a loophole in the rules for large corporations and labor unions.

The legislation would make changes to the legal definition of “grassroots lobbying” and require any organization that encourages 500 or more members of the general public to contact their elected representatives to file a report with detailed information about their organization to the government on a quarterly basis.

The report would include identifying the organization’s expenditures, the issues focused on and the members of Congress and other federal officials who are the subject of the advocacy efforts. A separate report would be required for each policy issue the group is active on.

“Right now, grassroots groups don’t have to report at all if they are communicating with the public,” said Dick Dingman of the Free Speech Coalition, Inc. “This is an effort that would become a major attack on the 1st Amendment.”

Under the bill, communications aimed at an organization’s members, employees, officers or shareholders would be exempt from the reporting requirement. That would effectively exempt most corporations, trade associations and unions from the reporting requirements—but not most conservative grassroots groups, which frequently are less formally organized.

Larger, well-funded organizations are also currently eligible for a “low-dollar lobbyist exemption” that Pelosi’s bill does not give to grassroots organizations. If an organization retains a lobbyist to contact lawmakers directly at a cost of $2,500 per quarter or less, or employs a full-time lobbyist at a cost of $10,000 per quarter or less, the organization does not have to report to the government.

Public Citizen, a liberal “government watchdog,” is taking credit for helping Pelosi craft the legislation and expects the final draft of the bill to closely resemble Pelosi’s Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2006, which contains these provisions.

Craig Holman, a lobbyist for Public Citizen, said the changes would help “streamline” how grassroots organizations are regulated by the IRS and other laws. Public Citizen would like Congress to adopt the IRS’s definition of “lobbying,” which includes communication that encourages the general public to contact a member of Congress on pending legislation or public policy.

“The IRS has a definition that requires all organizations, including non-profits, to file as a part of our tax returns,” Holman said. “When it comes to the election code and the lobbying disclosure act, they have no definition of grassroots lobbying. It’s excluded from everything. The IRS has a definition of grassroots lobbying, but their information is not publicly reported. It’s just our tax returns to the IRS.”

Suzanne Coffman, director of communication for Guidestar.org, which makes IRS 990 forms available on the Internet, said any secular, non-profit organization that has more than $25,000 in income per year is required by law to make the last three years worth of tax forms available upon request. “We get them directly from the IRS, and we have more than two million 990s online” said Coffman. “For non-charitable organizations, like private charities or private foundations, we have fewer because the IRS began scanning those only in April 2005. They focused on charitable organizations, which make up the bulk of exempt organizations, because those are the ones that accept tax-deductible contributions. The need for accountability is much higher with them than with other types of organizations which are sort of subsidized by the taxpayer because they federally are tax exempt, but not like a charity is.”

Public Citizen’s public IRS 990 disclosure forms show that it raised more than $3 million in 2005. That year, the group spent $297, 431 on mail and $178,182 on consulting and professional fees.

A coalition of grassroots organizers, including David Keene of the American Conservative Union, Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America and Terrence Scanlon of the Capitol Research Center, have written an open letter calling on Public Citizen to renounce its efforts, which they called “flawed to the point of hypocrisy.”

“This bill would apply to those who have no Washington-based lobbyists, who provide no money or gifts to members of Congress, and who merely seek to speak, associate and petition the government,” it said. “Regulating the speech, publishing, association and petitioning rights of citizens is not targeted at corruption in Washington, as Public Citizen and its supporters would believe. Instead, it is targeted directly at the 1st-Amendment rights of citizens and their voluntary associations.”

The Lobbying Transparency and Accountability Act, which made some of these changes, was actually approved by both the House and the Senate in the 109th Congress, but failed to make it through a conference committee.

To help dramatize the bill this time around, Pelosi is planning to assign sponsorship of various amendments to incoming freshman, which they will promote in their maiden House floor speeches.

Current law prevents former members of Congress and senior staff as well as senior executive staff from lobbying for one year. Pelosi’s proposal would extend that to two years and completely ban members and staff from accepting gifts, meals and privately sponsored travel.

Miss Carpenter is Assistant Editor for HUMAN EVENTS. She is the author of "The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy's Dossier on Hillary Rodham Clinton," published by Regnery (a HUMAN EVENTS sister company).


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; abuse; antifreespeech; banglist; benedictarnolds; campaignfinance; censorship; congress; constitution; corruption; democrats; emailcongress; fascism; firstamendment; freespeech; guncontrol; immigrantlist; nazipelosi; pelosi; secondamendment; shallmakenolaw; thoughtcrime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-351 next last
To: Jim Robinson
Nancy Pelosi (D.-Calif.) has pledged to take up a lobbying reform proposal that would impose new regulations on speech by grassroots organizations, while providing a loophole in the rules for large corporations and labor unions.

B-b-but I thought it was us eeevil conservatives that we're the puppets of big eeevil corporations, and loved oppressing everyone?
21 posted on 12/15/2006 6:21:12 PM PST by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
This really pisses me off to speak bluntly. The average voter has almost no say nor the time to follow all the issues, so we rely on many grassroots groups to keep us informed and remind us when major issues are hitting the floor. I'm sorry, but it's none of the House's business how we are meeting and who we are contacting.

This anti-lobbying BS is ridiculous. As if lobbying is evil or unconstitutional. Forget more laws - if leftists stink as lobbyists, that's they're fault not ours.

22 posted on 12/15/2006 6:21:32 PM PST by rjp2005 (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fhlh

Tell me what, that he's a damn fool?


23 posted on 12/15/2006 6:22:08 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I already saw some 'genius' state that McCain is the "only one who can save us".
McCain likely would go along with this 'brill-yont' idea of Pelosi's.
*sigh*
24 posted on 12/15/2006 6:22:18 PM PST by Darksheare ("I fear your smile and the promise it hides." See, she LOVES me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Mo1; KevinDavis; Jim Robinson
Well, since Jim posted this thread, I guess we shouldn't ping the posters who are happy the democrats won. Let them venture forth on their own.

:)


25 posted on 12/15/2006 6:22:19 PM PST by onyx (Phillip Rivers, LT and the San Diego Chargers! WOO-HOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
Maybe THEY will learn a few lessons.

I doubt it .. last I checked, they were still blaming republicans

26 posted on 12/15/2006 6:22:26 PM PST by Mo1 (Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

You know they won't; they are positive they are right and we are wrong.


27 posted on 12/15/2006 6:22:40 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: onyx; All

All right everyone. Time to fire up those phone calls and letters to your congressional reps. Let the grassroots war against these fascist dictators begin!


28 posted on 12/15/2006 6:23:01 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
they are positive they are right and we are wrong.

Well .. if Nancy gets her way .. no one will hear what they have to say

29 posted on 12/15/2006 6:23:38 PM PST by Mo1 (Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I wouldn't be surprised if John McCain decides to sponsor this in the Senate.

I hate San Francisco Nazis.


30 posted on 12/15/2006 6:24:09 PM PST by You Dirty Rats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx; All

I think we should ping them.....


31 posted on 12/15/2006 6:24:11 PM PST by KevinDavis (Nancy you ignorant Slut!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Which will just be one more ISSUE to add to their agenda.


32 posted on 12/15/2006 6:24:27 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; Indy Pendance


Yes sir! Let me try to find the link to Indy Pendance's posting of ALL their names, addresses, and telephone numbers.


33 posted on 12/15/2006 6:24:33 PM PST by onyx (Phillip Rivers, LT and the San Diego Chargers! WOO-HOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

my point exactly!


34 posted on 12/15/2006 6:24:48 PM PST by fhlh (Liberal (noun): A person so open minded, their brains have fallen out of their head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thank you for posting this and for sounding the alarm and the call to action.

This is just one of many "initiatives" that I am sure they are about to hit us with if they can get away with it.

Let's get busy......so they cannot get away with it!

35 posted on 12/15/2006 6:24:55 PM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

The liberal blogs and forums would oppose this as much as we do.

I don't think this legislation will see the light of day.


36 posted on 12/15/2006 6:24:55 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis


LOL -- go ahead.....


37 posted on 12/15/2006 6:25:02 PM PST by onyx (Phillip Rivers, LT and the San Diego Chargers! WOO-HOO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I'll admit I've been pretty quiet lately as far as phone calls and letters, but this REALLY fires me up. The average conservative lobbying group is a small group on a shoestring budget and it's none of Nancy's freakin business how we conduct ours.

Letters and phone-calls - LOCK AND LOAD!


38 posted on 12/15/2006 6:25:18 PM PST by rjp2005 (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
The liberal blogs and forums would oppose this as much as we do.

I wouldn't count on it .. the liberals help Nancy write this Bill

39 posted on 12/15/2006 6:26:08 PM PST by Mo1 (Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

They want to shut us up. They think they have the ability to take away the very Rights, the very Right, the Founding Father's intended us to have, keep, and hold sacred.


40 posted on 12/15/2006 6:26:30 PM PST by EBH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-351 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson