Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zimbabwe Has No Plans To Turn Over Convicted Ethiopian Dictator (Mugabe protects Mengistu)
allheadlinenews.com ^ | December 13, 2006

Posted on 12/14/2006 3:15:09 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe

Harare, Zimbabwe (AHN) - Zimbabwe will not turn over former Former Former Ethiopian dictator Mengistu Haile Miriam, despite his conviction of genocide.

William Nhara, a spokesperson for President Robert Mugabe's government, says, "As a comrade of our struggle, Comrade Mengistu and his government played a key and commendable role during our struggle for independence and no one can dispute that."

"The judgment is an Ethiopian judgment and will not affect his status in Zimbabwe. As far as we know there is no extradition treaty between Harare and Addis Ababa."

Mengistu, who has been living in exile in Zimbabwe since he fell from power in 1991, was convicted of charges ranging from genocide, to imprisonment, homicide, and illegal confiscation of property.

Ethiopia's Federal High Court convicted Mengistu and 71 other defendants for their parts in the "Red Terror." According to the U.S. government, "The enormity of government-sponsored operations against suspected political opponents during the 'Red Terror' has defied accurate analysis and has made attempts at quantification of casualties irrelevant."

"Sources estimated that, during 1977-78, about 30,000 people had perished as a result of the Red Terror and harsh conditions in prisons, kebele jails, and concentration camps."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: africa; baseketball; baselessaccusations; christian; christianity; concentrationcamps; durkadurka; islam; jihad; nukemecca; racism; religionofpeace; reparations; rop; slaveryreparations; wordgames
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 501-509 next last
To: EnochPowellWasRight
I would not. Muslims view themselves members of the Ummah - the Muslim nation. In war, it is customary to sequester enemy aliens and their allies until hostilities have ceased.

The Nazis' reasoning was similar. I see the connection is more than coincidental.

In current parlance, "concentration camp" is the same as a "death camp". I'm certain you know that well enough. An "internment camp" is entirely different.

Apparently, the "current parlance" is not as unanimous as you think.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentration_camp

In any case, that's splitting hairs. You want to imprison Americans based on their religion and/or ethnicity. You have done nothing to earn our trust that you won't want to escalate your concentration camps into extermination camps. And, most tellingly, you've never denounced the idea. The silence is deafening.

61 posted on 12/30/2006 7:25:44 AM PST by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: zimdog
"The Nazis' reasoning was similar. I see the connection is more than coincidental."

No, the "Nazi view" was to kill them all. The Allies interned them. There is a significant difference.

"Apparently, the "current parlance" is not as unanimous as you think."

Oh, "Wiki" as a source. LOL.

"You want to imprison Americans based on their religion and/or ethnicity."

Only their belief system. It is anathema to the West.

"You have done nothing to earn our trust that you won't want to escalate your concentration camps into extermination camps."

Who is this "we" in your "our" here? Regardless, Muslims have done NOTHING to earn OUR trust that they don't intend to destroy this country by driving it under the boot of Islam.

"And, most tellingly, you've never denounced the idea. The silence is deafening."

So does Michelle Malkin, by the way. So did the USSC once upon a time. You intern enemy aliens and their allies (by their identification with the Ummah first, they are alien to us) until the war is over.

"The silence is deafening."

What is deafening is the lack of support for your view on FR.
62 posted on 12/30/2006 9:24:56 AM PST by EnochPowellWasRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: zimdog; EnochPowellWasRight
Just show a single one of my posts that tries to justify, deny, or defend genocide by anyone against anyone at anytime anywhere and in any manner.

Somebody who defends Nazis implicitly supports their actions. Somebody who defends Communists implicitly supports their mass-murdering ways. And anyone who defends Islam implicitly buys into what Islam preaches:

Notes on Islam

The main sources of Islamic scripture is the Qu'ran (which ranks first) and the Sunnah

According to the website of the Muslim Students Association:

In Islam, the Arabic word sunnah has come to denote the way Prophet Muhammad (saas), the Messenger of Allah, lived his life. The Sunnah is the second source of Islamic jurisprudence, the first being the Qur'an. Both sources are indispensable; one cannot practice Islam without consulting both of them. The Arabic word hadith (pl. ahadith) is very similar to Sunnah, but not identical. A hadith is a narration about the life of the Prophet (saas) or what he approved - as opposed to his life itself, which is the Sunnah as already mentioned.
From my copy of the Koran:
 
Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day ... until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low
            Surah IX:29

O ye who believe! Choose not for friends such of those who received the Scriptures before you
        Surah V:57

Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them captive, and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush...
        Surah IX:5

And slay them wherever ye find them ... Such is the reward of disbelievers.
        Surah II:191
 

The following are quoted directly from the Hadith

Selections from the Hadith

Entrance into Heaven:

From Understanding Islam, page 2: "no one however devout and pious, can be sure of winning God's favor."

There is one, and exactly one, exception: Hadith Volume 4, Book 53, Number 352:

Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Apostle said, "Allah guarantees him who strives in His Cause and whose motivation for going out is nothing but Jihad in His Cause and belief in His Word, that He will admit him into Paradise (if martyred) or bring him back to his dwelling place, whence he has come out, with what he gains of reward and booty."
Note the bolded part above in hadith 352. The one and only guaranteed way into Muslim paradise is to be killed while fighting in Jihad.
On the Islamic "Last Days":
The Hadith Volume 4, Book 52, Number 176:
Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Umar:

Allah's Apostle said, "You (i.e. Muslims) will fight with the Jews till some of them will hide behind stones. The stones will (betray them) saying, 'O 'Abdullah (i.e. slave of Allah)! There is a Jew hiding behind me; so kill him.' "

The Hadith Volume 4, Book 52, Number 177:
Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah's Apostle said, "The (Final) Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."

On "collateral damage" (killing noncombatants)
Volume 4, Book 52, Number 256:
Narrated As-Sab bin Jaththama:

The Prophet passed by me at a place called Al-Abwa or Waddan, and was asked whether it was permissible to attack the pagan warriors at night with the probability of exposing their women and children to danger. The Prophet replied, "They (i.e. women and children) are from them (i.e. pagans)." I also heard the Prophet saying, "The institution of Hima [sanctuary; inviolate zone] is invalid except for Allah and His Apostle."

[ translation: the women and children of infidels are acceptable "collateral damage". A Muslim has no need to avoid killing them while attacking infidels (as the Palestinian suicide bombers demonstrate repeatedly) ]

Volume 4, Book 52, Number 196:
Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah 's Apostle said, " I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' and whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' his life and property will be saved by me except for Islamic law, and his accounts will be with Allah, (either to punish him or to forgive him.)"

On Treatment of Those Who Try to Leave Islam
Treatment of a Jew who converted to Islam and left Islam to go back to Judaism Hadith Volume 9, Book 84, Number 58:
Narrated Abu Burda:
Abu Musa said, "I came to the Prophet along with two men (from the tribe) of Ash'ariyin, one on my right and the other on my left, while Allah's Apostle was brushing his teeth (with a Siwak), and both men asked him for some employment. The Prophet said, 'O Abu Musa (O 'Abdullah bin Qais!).' I said, 'By Him Who sent you with the Truth, these two men did not tell me what was in their hearts and I did not feel (realize) that they were seeking employment.' As if I were looking now at his Siwak being drawn to a corner under his lips, and he said, 'We never (or, we do not) appoint for our affairs anyone who seeks to be employed. But O Abu Musa! (or 'Abdullah bin Qais!) Go to Yemen.'" The Prophet then sent Mu'adh bin Jabal after him and when Mu'adh reached him, he spread out a cushion for him and requested him to get down (and sit on the cushion). Behold: There was a fettered man beside Abu Muisa. Mu'adh asked, "Who is this (man)?" Abu Muisa said, "He was a Jew and became a Muslim and then reverted back to Judaism." Then Abu Muisa requested Mu'adh to sit down but Mu'adh said, "I will not sit down till he has been killed. This is the judgment of Allah and His Apostle (for such cases) and repeated it thrice. Then Abu Musa ordered that the man be killed, and he was killed. Abu Musa added, "Then we discussed the night prayers and one of us said, 'I pray and sleep, and I hope that Allah will reward me for my sleep as well as for my prayers.'"

Mohammod on Prostitution:

Hadith Volume 6, Book 60, Number 139:
Narrated Abdullah:
We used to participate in the holy wars carried on by the Prophet and we had no women (wives) with us. So we said (to the Prophet ). "Shall we castrate ourselves?" But the Prophet forbade us to do that and thenceforth he allowed us to marry a woman (temporarily) by giving her even a garment, and then he recited: "O you who believe! Do not make unlawful the good things which Allah has made lawful for you."
On Punishment for Killing non-Muslims
Hadith Volume 1, Book 3, Number 111:
Narrated Ash-Sha'bi:
Abu Juhaifa said, "I asked Ali, 'Have you got any book (which has been revealed to the Prophet apart from the Qur'an)?' 'Ali replied, 'No, except Allah's Book or the power of understanding which has been bestowed (by Allah) upon a Muslim or what is (written) in this sheet of paper (with me).' Abu Juhaifa said, "I asked, 'What is (written) in this sheet of paper?' Ali replied, it deals with The Diyya (compensation (blood money) paid by the killer to the relatives of the victim), the ransom for the releasing of the captives from the hands of the enemies, and the law that no Muslim should be killed in Qisas (equality in punishment) for the killing of (a disbeliever).
On Mohammod's Having Sex With a Nine Year Old Girl
He marries his six year old niece Aisha and has sex with her when she turns nine Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64:
Narrated 'Aisha:
that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).
Volume 7, Book 62, Number 65: Narrated 'Aisha:
that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that 'Aisha remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death)." what you know of the Quran (by heart)'
Volume 7, Book 62, Number 18:
Narrated 'Ursa:
The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for 'Aisha's hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said "But I am your brother." The Prophet said, "You are my brother in Allah's religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry."
Volume 8, Book 73, Number 151:
Narrated 'Aisha:
I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet, and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah's Apostle used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet would call them to join and play with me. (The playing with the dolls and similar images is forbidden, but it was allowed for 'Aisha at that time, as she was a little girl, not yet reached the age of puberty.) (Fateh-al-Bari page 143, Vol.13)

On Islamic Paradise

From the Qu'ran, Chapter 52, "The Mounting"
Lo! those who kept their duty dwell in gardens and delight,
Happy because of what their Lord hath given them, and (because) their Lord hath warded off from them the torment of hell-fire.
(And it is said unto them): Eat and drink in health (as a reward) for what ye used to do,
They will recline (with ease) on Thrones (of dignity) arranged in ranks; and We shall join them to Companions, with beautiful big and lustrous eyes.
... Round about them will serve, (devoted) to them, young male servants (handsome) as Pearls well-guarded.
They will advance to each other, engaging in mutual enquiry.
[I'm guessing that all needs and desires will be satisfied, one way or another]

63 posted on 12/30/2006 12:04:54 PM PST by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the arrogance to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Somebody who defends Nazis implicitly supports their actions. Somebody who defends Communists implicitly supports their mass-murdering ways. And anyone who defends Islam implicitly buys into what Islam preaches:

So someone (you) who defends an advocate of concentration camps (EnochPowellWasRight) implicitly supports concentration camps, right?

64 posted on 01/03/2007 12:12:42 PM PST by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: EnochPowellWasRight
No, the "Nazi view" was to kill them all. The Allies interned them. There is a significant difference.

There is a "significant difference" between "reasoning" and "goals". I said that you and the Nazis use similar reasoning to justify your concentration camps -- a charge you seem to accept, given your unwillingness to either retract your words or attempt to refute me.

Oh, "Wiki" as a source. LOL.

As a source for "current parlance", it's pretty good. And that is how I used it. Mind you, you don't cite any sources when you say "the vast majority of Americans agree with me" and other claptrap.

Who is this "we" in your "our" here? Regardless, Muslims have done NOTHING to earn OUR trust that they don't intend to destroy this country by driving it under the boot of Islam.

"We" are Americans and I'll repeat again, you have done nothing to earn our trust.

So does Michelle Malkin, by the way. So did the USSC once upon a time. You intern enemy aliens and their allies (by their identification with the Ummah first, they are alien to us) until the war is over.

If you have information revealing enemy aliens and their plans, please contact the FBI. What we are talking about here is the internment of innocent Americans based on nothing more than the fact that you find their ethnic and/or religious background to be unpalatable.

What is deafening is the lack of support for your view on FR.

Oh, "FR general opinion" as a source. LOL. How is that any different than Wikipedia?

65 posted on 01/03/2007 12:21:50 PM PST by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: zimdog
" I said that you and the Nazis use similar reasoning to justify your concentration camps -- a charge you seem to accept, given your unwillingness to either retract your words or attempt to refute me. "

If so, then every other nation at war has just the same reasoning - including THIS ONE.

"Mind you, you don't cite any sources when you say "the vast majority of Americans agree with me" and other claptrap. "

There was a recent study that indicated that half the population want mosques infiltrated and monitored.

"What we are talking about here is the internment of innocent Americans based on nothing more than the fact that you find their ethnic and/or religious background to be unpalatable."

Civilized society finds the political goals unpalatable. Just as THEY find the Constitution unpalatable and seek to overthrow it.

The Constitution isn't a suicide pact. I believe Abe said that at one point.

""We" are Americans and I'll repeat again, you have done nothing to earn our trust. "

I am an American, son. My family has been "American" since before there was a United States of America. My ancestors didn't fight for our freedom only to see my generation surrender it to your friends. *I* am not a member of an extra-national organization seeking to overthrow not only this country but all other Infidel nations. It is THOSE people who have given us no reason to trust them and every reason not to.
66 posted on 01/03/2007 7:01:02 PM PST by EnochPowellWasRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: EnochPowellWasRight
If so, then every other nation at war has just the same reasoning - including THIS ONE.

Every other nation at war sends its people to concentration camps based on their ethnic and/or religious background? You sources, please?

There was a recent study that indicated that half the population want mosques infiltrated and monitored.

We can all make up statistics. You, however, have not earned this country's trust. You will have to cite facts.

Civilized society finds the political goals unpalatable. Just as THEY find the Constitution unpalatable and seek to overthrow it.

If you have evidence that THEY are working to overthrow our Constitution, please provide it to the authorities.

*I* am not a member of an extra-national organization seeking to overthrow not only this country but all other Infidel nations.

Then, pray tell, if you are so American, why is your screenname in homage to a foreign politician who is the darling of the (racist) British Nationalist Party? I'd say you have "divided loyalties" at least.

67 posted on 01/03/2007 9:15:33 PM PST by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: EnochPowellWasRight

I hope you see the irony of your defense of concentration camps on a thread about Mengistu's genocide conviction.


68 posted on 01/03/2007 9:17:30 PM PST by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: zimdog
"I hope you see the irony of your defense of concentration camps on a thread about Mengistu's genocide conviction."

There you go again, zimdog. Equating internment with murder....
69 posted on 01/03/2007 10:31:53 PM PST by EnochPowellWasRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: zimdog
"Every other nation at war sends its people to concentration camps based on their ethnic and/or religious background? You sources, please? "

Every other nation interns enemy aliens and sympathizers until the war is over.

"You, however, have not earned this country's trust. You will have to cite facts. "

http://www.comm.cornell.edu/msrg/report1a.pdf

Considering this is several years old and Islam has shown itself for what it is more clearly, I'd imagine the percentage is higher than 44%.

Pretty damn arrogant of you to claim to represent the country absent any evidence. ESPECIALLY when your opinion just happens to provide cover for the very people who want to END my country. You aren't the "we" in this argument.

Islam is the enemy of the West by its own words and intent. You side with Islam. What does that make you? American? Not hardly.

"If you have evidence that THEY are working to overthrow our Constitution, please provide it to the authorities. "

Their entire political movement is working to overthrow the Constitution.

"Then, pray tell, if you are so American, why is your screenname in homage to a foreign politician who is the darling of the (racist) British Nationalist Party? I'd say you have "divided loyalties" at least."

For the same reason many Americans respect Churchill, Enoch Powell Was Right. Unimpeded 3rd world immigration is death. I already know where your loyalties lie, as you stand up to be counted with my country's enemies.

Islam is the ideology of the enemy.
70 posted on 01/03/2007 10:44:29 PM PST by EnochPowellWasRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: EnochPowellWasRight
Every other nation interns enemy aliens and sympathizers until the war is over.

Every civilized nation does so after a demonstration of guilt or probable cause that goes beyond the skin color, facial characteristics, or prayer books of the accused.

Considering this is several years old and Islam has shown itself for what it is more clearly, I'd imagine the percentage is higher than 44%.

The report you cited does not mention anything about "indicat[ing] that half the population want mosques infiltrated and monitored" as you claim in #66. Rather, the numbers break down like this, with the percentages indicating percentage of respondents agreeing with the statements below:

All Muslim Americans should be required to register their whereabouts with the federal government: 27

Mosques should be closely monitored and surveilled by U.S. law enforcement agencies: 26

U.S. government agencies should profile citizens as potential threats based on being Muslim or having Middle Eastern heritage: 22

Muslim civic and volunteer organizations should be infiltrated by undercover law enforcement agents to keep watch on their activities and fundraising: 29

And while a concentration camp interning people beased on their religious and/or ethnic background (like you support) would seemingly require the general public to support all 4 of these statements and then some, only 9% of the respondents supported all four statements. Hardly the great national majority you wax on and on about.

This is one of the reasons why you don't cite your sources, I suppose.

Pretty damn arrogant of you to claim to represent the country absent any evidence. ESPECIALLY when your opinion just happens to provide cover for the very people who want to END my country.

Between the two of us, only one has advocated concentration camps for Americans, and it wasn't me. Doesn't put you in a good position to claim to speak for our country, Enoch.

Their entire political movement is working to overthrow the Constitution.

See above.

I already know where your loyalties lie, as you stand up to be counted with my country's enemies.

I'll limit my support for British racists to instances when they support America in policy issues defined by real Americans. I'll let you know when we'll meet with you.

71 posted on 01/04/2007 8:48:33 AM PST by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: EnochPowellWasRight
There you go again, zimdog. Equating internment with murder....

Concentration camps facilitate genocide. I suspect that's why you support them, even if you play coy and act nearly-Constitutional at this point in history.

72 posted on 01/04/2007 8:49:54 AM PST by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: zimdog
"Every civilized nation does so after a demonstration of guilt or probable cause that goes beyond the skin color, facial characteristics, or prayer books of the accused. "

We have the same reasons to intern or at least monitor Muslims in this country that we had Japanese first generation in WWII. The situations are very similar. Were we not civilized in 1942?


"The report you cited does not mention anything about "indicat[ing] that half the population want mosques infiltrated and monitored" as you claim in #66. Rather, the numbers break down like this, with the percentages indicating percentage of respondents agreeing with the statements below: "

Actually, that's not what Cornell's executive summary indicates. What it does indicate is that half the country wants Muslim "rights" curtailed in some manner - that half the country doesn't trust Muslims and Islam. I'd lay odds that since then, the percentage has grown higher. More nuns killed. More riots over cartoons. More demands for special treatment on their part. It wears damn thin.

"Between the two of us, only one has advocated concentration camps for Americans, and it wasn't me. Doesn't put you in a good position to claim to speak for our country, Enoch. "

I advocate survival for my nation and civilization. You advocate surrender.

"I'll limit my support for British racists to instances when they support America in policy issues defined by real Americans. I'll let you know when we'll meet with you."

I see you parrot liberal opinion of Powell. Typical. I am a real American, "zimdog". I doubt you are. You are here on a student visa, right? From what Muslim country? If not, you're a dhimmi whether you know what that word means or not.
73 posted on 01/04/2007 9:34:32 PM PST by EnochPowellWasRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: zimdog
"Concentration camps facilitate genocide. "

A few posts ago you claimed that I was wrong to consider current parlance for "concentration camp" to be "death camp". Which is it, sonny?

" suspect that's why you support them, even if you play coy and act nearly-Constitutional at this point in history."

You think playing the useful idiot for Islam will help you. It won't. You support the enemy of my nation and the Constitution that defines our proper form of government. I think that places you on your proper side in this war.

The same one MoveOn.org and CAIR identifies it.
74 posted on 01/04/2007 9:37:02 PM PST by EnochPowellWasRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: zimdog

"Concentration camps facilitate genocide." Why did we not kill those interned during WWII then?


75 posted on 01/04/2007 9:51:00 PM PST by statered ("And you know what I mean.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: EnochPowellWasRight
We have the same reasons to intern or at least monitor Muslims in this country that we had Japanese first generation in WWII.

Racism? And I'll remind you that not only first generation immigrants and naturalized citizens that were interned, but Nissei and Sansei as well. Why is that?

Actually, that's not what Cornell's executive summary indicates. What it does indicate is that half the country wants Muslim "rights" curtailed in some manner - that half the country doesn't trust Muslims and Islam.

The study you cited indicates that less than 10% of those surveyed agree with a considerable milder restriction of civil liberties than your concentration camp scheme holds.

I advocate survival for my nation and civilization.

You want to concentration camps for Americans whose only "crime" is an ethnic and/or religious background that you find objectionable. That sounds more like ethnic cleansing than national survival.

I see you parrot liberal opinion of Powell. Typical.

Funny that you don't denounce the racist (and foreign nationalist) BNP that claims him as their intellectual father. The silence is deafening.

I am a real American, "zimdog".

The Rosenbergs' defense as well. You're free to stew in your vicious dreams of "purifying" America, as long as you don't act on them.

I doubt you are. You are here on a student visa, right? From what Muslim country? If not, you're a dhimmi whether you know what that word means or not.

A great thing about a free country like ours is that fools like you are free to openly declare what fools they are.

76 posted on 01/04/2007 9:56:21 PM PST by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: statered
"Concentration camps facilitate genocide." Why did we not kill those interned during WWII then?

Because it would be genocide.

My point was that the concentration camps make genocide easier, not inevitable.

77 posted on 01/04/2007 9:58:12 PM PST by zimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: zimdog; EnochPowellWasRight
You know that in order to be a devoted, serious muslim one must work for the establishment of Islamic "peace" via sharia law, right? And that Islam is more than a religion but is an all encompassing political/cultural/personal philosophy that mandates all must ultimately accept it without regard to personal freedom?

Or do you just get some sense of superiority by thinking you are fair and open minded while knowing very little about what Islam espouses? Are you one of those magnanimous folks who believe all philosophies are equivalent? A relativist?
78 posted on 01/04/2007 10:00:27 PM PST by statered ("And you know what I mean.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: zimdog
"My point was that the concentration camps make genocide easier, not inevitable"

Well hell so do countless other things - that's not to say all such things should not be employed if necessary. I'd hate to not have a machete next time I clear brush because it facilitates genocide like in Rwanda.
79 posted on 01/04/2007 10:03:09 PM PST by statered ("And you know what I mean.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: zimdog
"Racism? And I'll remind you that not only first generation immigrants and naturalized citizens that were interned, but Nissei and Sansei as well. Why is that?"

Intelligence indicated that they were a risk near our critical industrial centers, due to the efforts the Japanese Empire had made to encourage the loyalty of ex-pats AND ethnic Japanese people to the home country. American-Japanese at the time understood the necessity for this and volunteered in fairly large numbers to serve in the European Theater - with some distinction - to PROVE THEIR LOYALTY. Compare then to now.... Same situation, but the group in question makes no effort to prove their loyalty.

"The study you cited indicates that less than 10% of those surveyed agree with a considerable milder restriction of civil liberties than your concentration camp scheme holds. "

I didn't say that half the country - in this study - wants internment, but that half the country wants some civil liberties restrictions on Muslims.


"You want to concentration camps for Americans whose only "crime" is an ethnic and/or religious background that you find objectionable. That sounds more like ethnic cleansing than national survival. "

There's nothing "ethnic" about this and there's nothing particularly "religious" about the goal of Islam. If anything, I would trust converts like Ellison even less than I'd trust someone who grew up with it. In fact, FAR LESS.

"Funny that you don't denounce the racist (and foreign nationalist) BNP that claims him as their intellectual father. The silence is deafening. "

If you visit my links, you'll see a defense of Powell and his so-called "rivers of blood" speech from the Jewish World Review. You might learn something.

"The Rosenbergs' defense as well. You're free to stew in your vicious dreams of "purifying" America, as long as you don't act on them. "

Admit it. You crave the Islamification of America and the Infidel in his proper place. That IS what your friends want.

"A great thing about a free country like ours is that fools like you are free to openly declare what fools they are."

Useful idiots... People like you and Duranty are of a kind. He defended Stalin. You defend Mohammad and his minions. Same difference.
80 posted on 01/04/2007 10:17:22 PM PST by EnochPowellWasRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 501-509 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson