Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lab in lacrosse case found many DNA sources (DUKELAX)
The News and Observer ^ | December 13, 2006 | Joseph Neff and Benjamin Niolet, Staff Writers

Posted on 12/13/2006 1:36:38 PM PST by Howlin

A private laboratory hired by the prosecution in the Duke lacrosse case failed to report that it found DNA from multiple males in the accuser's body and underwear, according to a defense motion filed today. The lab, DNA Security of Burlington, found that the DNA did not match the three defendants, their lacrosse teammates or anyone else who submitted their DNA to police, including the accuser's boyfriend.

The new evidence emerged in thousands of documents handed over to the defense in October.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsobserver.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: anarchotyranny; crystalmangumbo; duke; dukelax; durhamdirtbag; firenifong; jailnifong; nifong; nifonggames; prosecutenifong; suenifong; travesty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 1,581-1,589 next last
To: tioga
Yes, it does and the baby will NOT have any "DUKE" DNA!

Nifong should be made to pay the boys and then thrown into jail!

601 posted on 12/14/2006 7:43:57 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: spectre; nopardons
"...witness protection" case?

What do you all mean by that?

602 posted on 12/14/2006 7:45:37 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 562 | View Replies]

To: Dukie07

Could this GET any more humiliating for them?


603 posted on 12/14/2006 7:46:24 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

Nope, that won't fly.


604 posted on 12/14/2006 7:46:43 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 581 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

I just don't know what to think anymore, tx.


605 posted on 12/14/2006 7:47:17 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
(No link)

Defense to get accuser's phone data
Seligmann's lawyer, Nifong spar; police to preserve notes
Herald-Sun, The (Durham, NC)
May 19, 2006
Author: JOHN STEVENSON jstevenson@heraldsun.com; 419-6643
Estimated printed pages: 4

A judge agreed Thursday to let the defense try to find out what information is on the cell phone of the exotic dancer who has accused three Duke lacrosse players of rape, and also ordered police to preserve their notes in the case.
The decisions came as the case of State v. Reade Seligmann saw its first day in court after weeks of sometimes stunning developments, press conferences, leaked documents and almost nonstop chatter.

With a trial likely still months away, the brief hearing was supposed to be nothing more than a chance for District Attorney Mike Nifong and defense attorney Kirk Osborn, representing one of the three Duke lacrosse players charged with first-degree rape, sexual offense and kidnapping, to settle some administrative issues.

But that didn't stop the two sides from sparring over a number of issues, including what kind of access, if any, the defense would have to the accuser's cell phone, which is in police custody.

With protesters demonstrating outside the judicial building, Superior Court Judge Ron Stephens admonished those in the packed courtroom to be quiet and respect the proceeding.

"I'm not sure why everybody is here, but this is a court of law," Stephens said at the outset. "This is my court... If anybody thought this was a public forum in which anybody could stand and speak, that is not going to be allowed. I will put you in jail. If you stay, you have to abide by my rules."

Before the hearing began, the district attorney gave the defense 1,278 pages of prosecution information about the case, along with two videotapes and a photo CD.

In response to a defense request to "preserve" the accuser's cell phone, Stephens ordered that defense attorneys be allowed to view information retrieved from the phone. Lawyers said it might be important to know who the woman called on the night of the alleged rape, which allegedly occurred during a March 13 party attended by Duke lacrosse players. The accuser was hired as an exotic dancer for the party.

Stephens also granted a defense motion to preserve police notes in the case, although he cautioned that attorneys may not "rummage through" the files of officers.

However, Stephens declined Thursday to consider an immediate reduction of Seligmann's $400,000 bond.

Seligmann, a 20-year-old Duke sophomore at the time of the alleged crime, posted bail with a certified check and was released from jail a few hours after his indictment last month. But a defense motion says the money was supplied by a family friend who would like to have much of it back.

Stephens indicated that a possible bond reduction could be considered later.

The other defendants are Collin Finnerty and David Evans, who also are free under $400,000 bonds.

All three will have their next court appearances during the week of June 19.

Osborn, representing Seligmann, said Thursday he wanted his client's case tried as soon as possible.

"This young kid wants to go to school in the fall, and he can't until this is resolved," said Osborn.

"I respect the seriousness of the case," Stephens replied. "But this case is not going to jump ahead of the line of all the other cases we have."

Without being more specific, District Attorney Mike Nifong had previously said the spring of 2007 would be a good target time for the trial. And on Thursday, Nifong said he would seek to have all three suspects tried together, rather than one at a time.

Seligmann said nothing on his own behalf Thursday.

Before the court hearing, Nifong filed a motion saying he was entitled to receive certain information from defense attorneys. Among that information, Nifong said he needed advance notice if any of the suspects intended to claim "entrapment, insanity, mental infirmity, diminished capacity, self-defense, accident, automatism, involuntary intoxication and voluntary intoxication."

Nifong also wanted to know if any of the suspects intended to mount an alibi defense.

In fact, Seligmann already gave notice of an alibi, claiming he had phone, taxicab and ATM records to prove he was otherwise occupied during the only time defense lawyers believe a rape could have occurred.

As part of the motion filed Thursday, Nifong listed nine expert witnesses he expects to testify for the prosecution: L.D. Milks, Timothy G. Suggs, Hope Copeland, Jennifer Leyn and Rachel Winn of the State Bureau of Investigation; Brian W. Meehan and R.W. Scales of DNA Securities in Burlington; and Tara Levicy and J. Manly of Duke University Hospital.

The SBI conducted an initial round of scientific testing in the case but, according to defense attorneys, found no DNA from Seligmann, Finnerty, Evans or 43 other Duke lacrosse players in or on the alleged rape victim's body, on her clothing and belongings or under her fingernails -- even though she said she clawed at her attackers in an attempt to fend them off.

DNA Securities then conducted a second round of tests and found -- again according to defense lawyers -- that the exotic dancer had engaged in sex with a man about the time of the alleged rape. But the man was not a Duke lacrosse player and was not at the March party, attorneys said.

They said they believed the individual was romantically linked to the dancer.

In addition, DNA Securities found tissue on one of the dancer's fake acrylic fingernails that was "consistent" with Evans' bodily makeup, but the match was inconclusive, defense lawyers said.

The fingernail in question was retrieved from a trash can at 610 North Buchanan Blvd., where Evans was one of three tenants.

(snip)


606 posted on 12/14/2006 7:47:42 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I cannot even imagine what is going through their minds right now....


607 posted on 12/14/2006 7:47:42 PM PST by Dukie07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

I'm sure she'll be breastfeeding out in the hall.


608 posted on 12/14/2006 7:48:17 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

What the hell is wrong with Ted; he actually acted like it might be one of theirs.


609 posted on 12/14/2006 7:48:57 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 588 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

"Could this GET any more humiliating for them?"

Not much. I'm sure their parents are just thrilled at the news as well. Just thinking about it makes me want to throw up.


610 posted on 12/14/2006 7:50:13 PM PST by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

{{{{{shudder}}}}}


611 posted on 12/14/2006 7:50:55 PM PST by Sue Perkick (Just a water spider on the pond of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies]

To: Dukie07

I can hardly even keep up; tomorrow is going to be a blockbuster, IMO.


612 posted on 12/14/2006 7:52:06 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 607 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

...in a makeshift manger with three wise men...


613 posted on 12/14/2006 7:52:24 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I'm sure she'll be breastfeeding out in the hall.

SHHH... Gloria Allred will see that and beat a trail to her door to represent her. I can't count how many times she talked about how proud she was of breastfeeding Amber Frye who was so brave and breastfeeding yada....

614 posted on 12/14/2006 7:52:33 PM PST by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

There are wise men in Durham? Seriously?


615 posted on 12/14/2006 7:53:26 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 613 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

LOL. This thing was already a circus. Now the clowns are riding bikes across the tightrope. But then again it is TED.


616 posted on 12/14/2006 7:53:44 PM PST by Sue Perkick (Just a water spider on the pond of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
The WITNESS PROTECTION ACT is used AFTER a witness has given evidence at a trial. The person gets his/her name changed and moved someplace else and virtually becomes someone else. They are NOT allowed to be in contact with any friends of family. This is usually used on "MOB" cases.

But I think that Nifong hid the "victim" away, acting as though the slut were in such a state. Of course, he's dead wrong. This whole thing has stuck from day one.

617 posted on 12/14/2006 7:54:12 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 602 | View Replies]

To: cgk; Dukie07

I honestly think this HAS to go to trial now. There is no other way to prove their absolute innocence.


618 posted on 12/14/2006 7:54:19 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 614 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

#608 LOL..thanks for the laugh.


619 posted on 12/14/2006 7:55:24 PM PST by Carolinamom ("I don't have time to be fingerpointing." ---President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies]

To: maggief

bttt


620 posted on 12/14/2006 7:55:25 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 606 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 1,581-1,589 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson