CNN’s (Jack) Cafferty on Dems Rejecting Push to Impeach Bush: ‘Strange’

http://newsbusters.org/ ^ | December 11, 2006 | Scott Whitlock

[syriacus]

Jack spends his time on mindless cavils
Like Bush's mileage during travels
Persnickety Jack Cafferty
Makes me want to laff-erty

CNN: Is Bush Spending Too Much Time on the Disasters? Or Too Little? , (FR 10/02/2005)

[SuziQ]

"She lost her congressional seat and is on her way back to civilian life. But McKinney isn’t the only person who thinks President Bush may have done things that rise to the levels of high crimes and misdemeanors. "

Yeah, Cynthia is joined in her desire to get rid of Bush by all the other liberal moonbats. Maybe Bela Pelosi figured it would be stupid to touch it.

[Verginius Rufus]

I wonder about a poll that shows over 50% of the public actually favoring impeaching President Bush (differing only in how high a priority they regard it) and only 44% against. Maybe the questions were worded in such a way that people who had never given the question a moment's thought believed that's what they were "supposed" to say.

The hyper-partisan Democrats who think perjury, intimidation of witnesses, destruction of evidence, even murder, are OK as long as they serve the cause of keeping Democrats in power (or preserving abortion on demand) are convinced that Bush has committed a slew of criminal offenses.

If the Democrats did push ahead with impeachment, the media would work overtime to convince the public they had a case, but what do they have to work with? Wiretapping conversations of terrorists? Abu Ghraib? The Joe Wilson nonsense? Invading Iraq without Kofi Annan's approval?