Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did A Lone Rabbi Mean to Ban Christmas Trees?
Townhall.com ^ | December 10, 2006 | Michael Medved

Posted on 12/11/2006 8:14:08 AM PST by beaversmom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 481-493 next last
To: TomGuy

For those that just can't get enough of being offended, they can get right here on FR and have almost "nonstop being offended" to their hearts delight. /sarc?


101 posted on 12/11/2006 9:09:37 AM PST by dforest (Liberals love crisis, create crisis and then dwell on them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom; All

KVI reporting that the Rabbi has gotten death threats.


102 posted on 12/11/2006 9:09:57 AM PST by djf (They have their place. We have our place. WAKE UP!! They want to turn our place into their place!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #103 Removed by Moderator

To: Hildy

Has anybody else noticed that Hildy has not showed up since getting bitch-slapped around about her STFU remark?


104 posted on 12/11/2006 9:13:07 AM PST by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

"Can anyone explain to me what religion's symbol is the Christmas Tree?"

Druids.


105 posted on 12/11/2006 9:14:30 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood
tear the Christmas trees down.

Please show me where the rabbi demanded to "tear the Christmas trees down."

He made no such ultimatum. The airport management came up with the idea to take the trees down.

106 posted on 12/11/2006 9:14:33 AM PST by Alouette (Psalms of the Day: 97-103)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

This article is dubious and absurd.

The Rabbi gave a SPECIFIC deadline. He said he would sue for the removal of the trees. He said do "this" or I will force you to do "that".

His mea culpa is laughable. The airport gave EXACTLY what the rabbi requested. If he did not want this result he sould not have asked for it.

(PS: The rabbi is responsible for all actions of his lawyer. The client controls the demand not the lawyer.)


Everything the rabbi gets in response to his ultimatum is 100% EARNED.


107 posted on 12/11/2006 9:14:37 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood

Here is my email to the Rabbi. His email address is: rabbi@chaiseattle.com

Rabbi Elazar Bogomilsky,

Why is removing Christmas trees from public forums during the Christmas season so important to you? When I see Jewish symbols I am not offended. I am very happy to see them. It tells me that there are people of faith and kindness. My first impulse when I see Jewish symbols is not to say there must also be a Christmas tree or I am going to sue!

Personally, I find your actions to be very petty and childish. Millions of people will go through the SEATAC terminals and be denied the traditional Christmas experience because you could not see your chosen Jewish symbol. That does not strike me as a positive way to win friends and find common ground with your opponents.

Hundreds of millions of Christians in this country generously support the State of Israel and all that she stands for. Do you think your petty stand “You must take down the Christmas trees, if you do not put up Jewish symbols, or I will sue is really the appropriate action to be taken? Why cannot you be as generous and understanding of American Christians as they are of the Jewish faith and the State of Israel?

You really have disappointed me. Your actions bring great sorrow to me and many others.

Sincerely,


108 posted on 12/11/2006 9:14:42 AM PST by daviscupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: diogenes ghost

Hildy who? (dry humor alert-sorry to have to add that but I've made too many comments like that the gotten serious responses)


109 posted on 12/11/2006 9:14:56 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: APRPEH
not exactly. the port authority's decision would be in conflict with Supreme Court case law. that is the attorney's job to point out.

I think the actions were foolish, but you're correct, there's no legal question about the Menorah display.

110 posted on 12/11/2006 9:15:34 AM PST by SJackson (had to move the national debate from whether to stay the course to how do we start down the path out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
He said he would sue for the removal of the trees.

Please show me the exact quote in which he demanded the removal of the trees.

111 posted on 12/11/2006 9:16:05 AM PST by Alouette (Psalms of the Day: 97-103)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

I do want to tip my hat to the local Jewish community here in the Seattle area. I have heard caller after caller on the radio saying they support keeping the Christmas trees up and are even circulation petitions to restore the trees and they are even offering volunteer labor to put them back up.

I would bet the Port of Seattle will reverse there decision by the weekend.


112 posted on 12/11/2006 9:17:07 AM PST by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: diogenes ghost

Well, if I was Hildy, I wouldn't converse with someone who bragged about "bitch-slapping" a lady, either.


113 posted on 12/11/2006 9:17:21 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

Or the Crack Pipes.


114 posted on 12/11/2006 9:17:52 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
The Rabbi gave a SPECIFIC deadline. He said he would sue for the removal of the trees. He said do "this" or I will force you to do "that".

I've seen nothing of the sort. I have seen a number of articles which indicate he might sue, stupid imo, over the display of the Menorah. (A suit he'd win).

Can you point me to where He said he would sue for the removal of the trees.

115 posted on 12/11/2006 9:18:41 AM PST by SJackson (had to move the national debate from whether to stay the course to how do we start down the path out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Unfortunately, the ACLU will sue.

They will have no legal standing, but Sea-Tac would rather not litigate. Since the ACLU gets money everytime they win one of these "civil rights" cases, they have little to lose.

Moreover, fighting these sorts of lawsuits brings in donation dollars for them.

Sea-Tac isn't afraid of losing the lawsuit, no matter what happens, they lose.


116 posted on 12/11/2006 9:19:06 AM PST by AmishDude (I coined "Senator Ass" to describe Jim Webb. He may have already used it as a character in a novel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Alouette

:)


117 posted on 12/11/2006 9:19:15 AM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Alouette; Kirkwood
Please show me where the rabbi demanded to "tear the Christmas trees down."

From the article, second paragraph:

A rabbi wanted to install an eight-foot menorah and have a public lighting ceremony. He threatened to sue if the menorah wasn’t put up and gave a two day deadline to remove the trees.

While it doesn't really say *tear* the trees down, I read it the same way about them being removed.

118 posted on 12/11/2006 9:20:15 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: APRPEH
You lost me. Are you saying the Port Authority's decision to put up Christmas trees was illegal? Or are you saying the Port Authority's decision to tear down the Christmas trees is illegal?

Personally I do not think the Port Authority did anything illegal. I just think the decision of the rabbi to threaten the Port Authority with a Federal lawsuit was stupid, childish, petty and mean-spirited. I wish the Port Authority had acted differently but the rabbi's actions were outrageous!
119 posted on 12/11/2006 9:20:27 AM PST by daviscupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
"STFU....what is wrong with ASKING that "

Where you come from, do people ask by hiring an attorney and giving 48 hours notice before filing a lawsuit?

That must be an interesting household. "Please pass the butter within 10 seconds or I will sue you."

jas3
120 posted on 12/11/2006 9:21:13 AM PST by jas3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 481-493 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson