And since homosexuals insist upon desiring limitless sexual activity, not governed by provincial rules and traditions, why would they want children?
Children are the undeniable product of the superiority of heterosexual engagement. And since homosexual behavior in large terms wishes to throw off the weight of conventional sexuality, I am curious as to why they would desire to reinforce the inferiority of their sexual behavior.
Perfect!
1 posted on
12/10/2006 2:01:52 PM PST by
wagglebee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: wagglebee
Thank you!!!!
Right and right on!!!
54 posted on
12/10/2006 3:05:50 PM PST by
eleni121
( + En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great))
To: wagglebee
Bravo, Kevin, for pointing out the obvious. Ignore the gaystapo.
To: wagglebee
58 posted on
12/10/2006 3:09:25 PM PST by
scripter
("If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." Romans 12:18)
To: wagglebee
This jerk is not asking questions. He is not curious. He simply thinks of himself as superior. Apparently he wasn't rasied as well as he thinks. He doesn't seem to know the difference between what is his business and what is not. A basic for grown ups.
62 posted on
12/10/2006 3:14:10 PM PST by
Sunsong
To: wagglebee
Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links I have an updated categorical index more than 3 times the size of the above index of links. It's too large for FR, but there are some folks who are reproducing the updated copy and making it available on the web. I'll check in on their progress and post a link.
63 posted on
12/10/2006 3:15:22 PM PST by
scripter
("If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." Romans 12:18)
To: wagglebee
Yes quite perfect. Incomplete, however, in that he doesn't state the fact that by having children, these family units and indeed these children themselves are the very tools needed and used to foist homosexual, transgendered, and homosexual parenting teaching on the public school system, and the public in general, including the government. Each time these teachings are objected to by parents of school children, the parents are told, "we must be inclusive, we have all these children who have same sex parents, and we mustn't have them feeling leftout". Before the public and government officials, they cry about how they cannot visit their children in the hospital, (a lie) How sad that these children are used as tools to further a political agenda.
When society allows these sexual practices to take center stage, and allow the people practicing them to raise children, society itself is feeding into their version of reality, a false reality. In America, at least when it comes to sexual pleasures, it seems one can invent whatever reality they so choose. However, the government needs to draw the line at laws and ordinances that force others to believe that alternate reality. Thought control, belief control is a very dangerous policy, ask any who fought Hitler. Societies cannot be forced to believe what it doesn't believe, nor can it be forced to ignore reality in favor of some PC alternate belief system that makes absolutely no sense.
89 posted on
12/10/2006 3:28:10 PM PST by
gidget7
(Political Correctness is Marxism with a nose job)
To: wagglebee
Why Would Gays Want Children? So the kids can take care of them when AIDS sets in?
245 posted on
12/10/2006 4:39:59 PM PST by
Go Gordon
(I don't know what your problem is, but I bet its hard to pronounce)
To: wagglebee; theothercheek; kiriath_jearim; Gadfly-At-Large; pryncessraych; aroostook war; TheRake; ..
+
If you want on (or off) this Catholic and Pro-Life ping list, let me know!
260 posted on
12/10/2006 4:52:35 PM PST by
narses
(St Thomas says "lex injusta non obligat.")
To: wagglebee
268 posted on
12/10/2006 4:59:27 PM PST by
Jim Noble
(Chairman, FR Rudy for President 2008 Caucus)
To: wagglebee
To attempt to normalize their aberrant behavior.
It's terribly pathetic.
To: wagglebee
294 posted on
12/10/2006 5:25:09 PM PST by
Tribune7
(Conservatives hold bad behavior against their leaders. Dims don't.)
To: wagglebee
Isn't it possible that couples who struggle with infertility are doing so because God is saying "You two don't need to be parents"? If they've waited too long because they were focused on a career, or if they neglected their health and perhaps exposed themselves to diseases that have made it impossible to bear children, why should they be trusted with children?
312 posted on
12/10/2006 5:32:12 PM PST by
Burkean
To: wagglebee
Much of what homosexuals and lesbians do is driven by their sexual behavior. This is in and of itself abnormal when compared to the normal heterosexual individual who has a variety of interests that have nothing to do with their heterosexuality.
Much of what homosexuals do in the public square - and this includes the adoption of children - is done in an attempt to normalize their deviant behavior in the eyes of society. Hitler knew that if the youth of Germany were placed under his care, that he could take over the nation without firing a shot. This is perhaps a secondary reason for homosexuals to promote adoption - so they can progandize members of the next generation of heterosexuals to be sympathetic to their cause if not recruit them outright.
Any heterosexual who supports homosexual adoption is, in my opinion, engaging in a form of child abuse.
314 posted on
12/10/2006 5:32:57 PM PST by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
To: wagglebee; All
The author make ONE BIG ASSUMPTION which is wrong.
He equates a theocracy would be the only way to ban homosexuals, this is wrong.
There are MANY and superior reasons to oppose homosexuals which has nothing to do with religion.
Other than that, the article is spot on.
341 posted on
12/10/2006 5:44:05 PM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: All
Andrews Sullyvain and other homosexual activists constantly bring up the red herring of the infirtile couple.
When an infirtile couple adopt, BOTH are required to assume legal responsiblity. An adoption agency does not adopt to the father but not the mother or vice versa. The child is generally never told of the adoption. The child only knows it has a normal mother and father family unit.
The homosexuals who adopt or artificially produce children are starting with an intentionally difficient childood. The child in Mary Chenny's homosexual sitiuation is intentionally denying the child a father. In fact her sex partner is nor even a LEGAL part of the child's life. Unless the state is in the minority which allows homosexual's sex partners to adopt she would be legally precluded.
In addition the child will always grow up know his/her mother placed sexual gratification over giving a child the best environment in its creation.
367 posted on
12/10/2006 5:56:51 PM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: wagglebee; shaggy eel; Cyrano; blackie; TommyDale
What they want is a sexuality that matches their own. It's the ultimate narcissism with regard to sexuality. e.g. a lesbian may (even unconsciously) think it's easier to understand another woman and her sexuality than to understand a man and work to be compatible with him - the inherent 'power struggle' between men and women is avoided (so they think).
A man, instead of trying to understand a woman and her sexuality, instead goes for the guy who will generally have the same kind of appetite as he does. I remember reading about how homosexuals generally aren't all that effeminate in their actual appetites. They still want sex the same way a guy wants it - they're still turned on by the visual, etc. They just want it with a guy.
Sorry if this sounds disjointed, this is kind of chain of thought.
375 posted on
12/10/2006 6:04:08 PM PST by
Terriergal
(All your church are belong to us! --- The Purpose Driven Church)
To: wagglebee
It is the equivalent of screwing a nut onto a bolt, by using a hammer. I don't think I needed THAT visual.
380 posted on
12/10/2006 6:06:36 PM PST by
Terriergal
(All your church are belong to us! --- The Purpose Driven Church)
To: wagglebee
By having children in the picture the attempt to complete the circle and to convince the world that such a family unit is normal is all important.The kids are a political tool for their selfishness.
387 posted on
12/10/2006 6:11:43 PM PST by
SuziQ
To: wagglebee
All gay adoption is child abuse.
392 posted on
12/10/2006 6:12:37 PM PST by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: wagglebee
I'm a little confused as to what all the hullabaloo is about on this thread... Hmm. It sounds like a reasonable article to me. Perhaps not completely accurate but not 'outrageous.'
401 posted on
12/10/2006 6:15:34 PM PST by
Terriergal
(All your church are belong to us! --- The Purpose Driven Church)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson