Mary Cheney and her partner Heather Poe
were joined by Mary's niece Kate
and the rest of the Cheney clan
at President Bush's victory rally on Nov. 3.
Children are the undeniable product of the superiority of heterosexual engagement. And since homosexual behavior in large terms wishes to throw off the weight of conventional sexuality, I am curious as to why they would desire to reinforce the inferiority of their sexual behavior.
Perfect!
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping lists.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Thank you for that post; I am so glad that someone can articulate what I feel on this particular subject. Well done!
"Instead the reason the sexual engagement does not work is because the necessary parts are not even present. It is the equivalent of screwing a nut onto a bolt, by using a hammer. They just don't fit."
Incorrect. There have been several articles on FR talking about how scientists are developing ways to turn female eggs into sperm and vice versa. So down the road it could be conceivable for two women to "create" a kid with their own DNA.
"There is a reason for homosexual activists to have kids; it is part of the great deception that no one is to question. By having children in the picture the attempt to complete the circle and to convince the world that such a family unit is normal is all important."
Oh please. This smacks of Hiterly's "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" charges. I'd chalk up the desire as being more personal - wating a "normal" family for themselves rather than a worldwide effort of brainwashing.
Great article. Thanks for posting it.
Why Would Gays Want Children?
For the same reasons heterosexuals want children, I would guess.
Next to the limitless sexual activity, they expect the rest of us to pin a medal on them, and so assuage their guilty consciences.
Children who are "raised" by gays are sure to be the victims of physical and mental abuse. What are gays going to teach a child, the various techniques of sodomy? How to spread disease? How to be a normal parent, who reproduces and therefore propagates homo sapiens on this planet? It should be illegal for gays to have a child in their custody.
What a preposterous statement; and that's saying something considering all the crap that's been written about this subject this week.
So they can pretend they are normal.
In order to make conservatives mad, for the most part.
"Is there a more obvious product of heterosexual behavior than the creation of children? If so then..."
...if so then why would anyone want to adopt a child they didn't create?
I hope that puts paid to this ridiculous screed.
Studies of Homosexual Parenting: A Critical Review
Homosexual Parenting: Placing Children at Risk
Homosexual Parenting Studies Are Flawed, Report Says
Homosexual Parents: 'Hidden Study' Uncovered
Experts Worldwide Find Gay Adoption Harmful for Children
Review of Research on Homosexual Parenting, Adoption, And Foster Parenting
Homosexual Parenting: Is It Time For Change?
Where Children Have No Voice: The"Right" of Adoption by Homosexual Partners
Dangers of Same-Sex Couples Adopting Children (Part 1)
Dangers of Same-Sex Couples Adopting Children (Part 2)
Children and homosexual adoption
Trophy children
Why stop with asking the question re pregnancy and child-rearing?
Since, as the author states, those who engage in "homosexual behavior in large terms [wish] to throw off the weight of conventional sexuality," I have often wondered why homosexuals so often mimic heterosexuality.
For example, it's quite clear that the homosexual community divides itself into those who adopt a "male" role and those who adopt a "female" role. And, further, that most homosexual couples, especially long-term couples, have a recognizably "male" member and a recognizably "female" member.
The community has all sorts of names and conventions surrounding the two gender roles they take on; this is not an observation made by outsiders only.
So one eventually has to ponder: if a homosexual man is a man sexually attracted to another man, why does he take up with a man that in many ways takes on a "female" persona---encompassing not only how feminine he looks, how he dresses, his role in sexual encounters, but even sometimes to the point of being the primary person doing domestic chores?
If a homosexual woman is a woman sexually attracted to another woman, why does she take up with a woman that for all the world looks, dresses herself, poses herself, and carries herself as a "male" persona---even sometimes to the point of taking on a job traditionally done by men (construction work, cable guy, etc.).
If homosexual men are not sexually attracted to women, how is it that they find men dressed up as women (drag queens)---often dressed to the point that they are completely unrecognizable as men---so erotic?
Why is it that more "flaming" (i.e., feminine) a homosexual man is, the more attractive other homosexual men find him?
Why is it that the more exaggerated the feminine "qualities" a drag queen exhibits (make-up, breasts, hair style, voice)---IOW, the more stereotypically, unambiguously and overwhelmingly female-like the drag queen is---the more beloved and wanted and admired that queen is?
Why do homosexual couples so often demonstrate a heterosexual composition and dynamic ( a "male" and "female" member with respective---if archetypical or stereotypical roles/demeanors---that mirror heterosexual male and female roles/demeanors)?
Why does a man who is sexually attracted to a man who acts like, often looks like, and somehow engages him in ways that mimic a woman conclude that he is not attracted to women, rather than conclude that he is attracted to women but somehow has a maladaptation to relating to actual women?
Why does a woman who is sexually attracted to a woman who is so butch she actually can pass for a man conclude that she is not attracted to men, rather than conclude that she is attracted to men but somehow has a maladaptation to relating to an actual man?
How is it that a lesbian can be sexually attracted to a woman who has a sex change and "becomes" a man, but she still maintains she is "oriented" to women, not men?
IOW, if homosexuality is a discreet sexual identity, then why does it manifest itself so often as a maladaptation of heterosexuality?
Cases of HIV Infection and AIDS in the United States, 2004
Cases of HIV Infection and AIDS in the United States, 2003
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Risk, Prevention, and Testing Behaviors --- United States, National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System: Men Who Have Sex with Men, November 2003--April 2005
HIV and Its Transmission
HIV/AIDS among Women
Science and Homosexuality New Evidence Found for Childhood Family Factors Influencing Sexual Orientation
Environmental factors may influence sexual orientation
The Study The Media Ignored
How Might Homosexuality Develop? Putting the Pieces Together
Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth
Born or Bred? Science Does Not Support the Claim That Homosexuality is Genetic
The Importance of Twin Studies
The Gay Gene?
The Fading "Gay Gene"
The Innate-Immutable Argument Finds No Basis in Science
The Gay Gene: Going, Going...Gone
Mary Cheney and her partner Heather Poe
were joined by Mary's niece Kate
and the rest of the Cheney clan
at President Bush's victory rally on Nov. 3.
Why Would Gays Want Children?
Because their needs are more important then a childs.
A Gay ( or not! ) Old Time- GM links