Why Would Gays Want Children?

Townhall ^ | 12/10/06 | Kevin McCullough

[wagglebee]

Is there a more obvious product of heterosexual behavior than the creation of children? If so then isn't it somewhat peculiar that those who shun the behavior of heterosexuality so deeply crave the product that it brings?

This week as I read the news that Mary Cheney, the 37 year old daughter of the Vice-President, was pregnant, I had many such questions running through my head.

I'm not supposed to mind you.

I'm not supposed to be allowed to think such things.

I'm not supposed to openly wonder what such conclusions might mean. Such wondering might bash the belief structure that men and women are completely interchangeable with one another. Yet I wonder them nonetheless. (Call it an ever growing desire to know the truth of the matter.)

Let's face it in America today if we bring up such obvious inconsistencies we are immediately branded and labeled a bigot. I was repeatedly labeled such this week for asking six additional questions arising from the fake act of two women supposedly "becoming parents." Argue with me all you like - the truth is Mary Cheney's baby will share DNA with Mary and the male DNA donor. Genetically he/she will share nothing with Cheney's partner Heather Poe.

So here's the next item I'm not allowed to bring up... Two women who desire children can not achieve satisfaction, because their sexual union is incapable of producing it. And this is fully true - even if all parties involved have healthy, fully functional reproductive biology.

When I mentioned this earlier in the week homosexual bloggers like Andrew Sullivan took exception with the notion and accused me of being hypocritical of the issue when it comes to infertile couples. Yet it is the critics who are being inconsistent.

If a man and wife struggle with infertility, it is because of biological breakdown. What God designed to work a certain way short circuited. He has low sperm count. She doesn't produce eggs as she should. They have trouble getting the two together. The biological dysfunction is not voluntary, they attempt sexual intercourse, time and time again but because of the faulty genetics in the machinery they are unable to complete the conception. And should medicine ever develop a cure for whatever that specific breakdown might be - there will be no problem for the couple, through natural sexual engagement to have another child.

Not so with Cheney and her partner. If they were to choose to engage in sex acts a thousand times over, their biological machinery would never produce what is needed - but for a different reason. There is no dysfunction in this case. Instead the reason the sexual engagement does not work is because the necessary parts are not even present. It is the equivalent of screwing a nut onto a bolt, by using a hammer. They just don't fit.

So after a cacophony of naughty e-mails being sent to me describing thousands of positions a male participant or a turkey baster can be used to impregnate a woman who only has had sex with women, I'm supposed to be intimidated so as to no longer ask these questions.

But they're good questions.

And doesn't the sick attempt at humor reveal what the purpose of my questions was from the very beginning?

In normal relationships the privacy and intimacy of the act of procreation is a spiritual and beautiful thing. In the sexual acts of women who sleep together that adequacy will be something they always long for and never have the satisfaction of knowing, thus undermining the fidelity of what they believe their relationship to be.

In our culture we don't think about our actions from the viewpoint of the One who created us. Rather we obsess about our rights to do what we want, how we want, and as often as we want.

But children are never about what we want. Raising them is about supplying what they need. Britney Spears does no one a service when she gets pregnant on the cheap in a marriage that doesn't last only to end up not providing a father for her children while flashing her nether region for paparazzi. Like wise how moral is it for Mary Cheney to bring a child into society who from the outcome is told that her second mommy is the equivalent of a true father?

There is a reason for homosexual activists to have kids; it is part of the great deception that no one is to question. By having children in the picture the attempt to complete the circle and to convince the world that such a family unit is normal is all important.

Since we do not live in a theocracy it is unreasonable to maintain that Americans will not all make the same choice when it comes to morality and sexual behavior. However that reality has nothing whatsoever to do with whether sexual behavior should be considered moral that extends beyond moral boundaries.

And since homosexuals insist upon desiring limitless sexual activity, not governed by provincial rules and traditions, why would they want children?

Children are the undeniable product of the superiority of heterosexual engagement. And since homosexual behavior in large terms wishes to throw off the weight of conventional sexuality, I am curious as to why they would desire to reinforce the inferiority of their sexual behavior.

And no amount of hate-mail from small minded radical activists will stifle the curiosity from which I seek to learn.

[Howlin]

Are you calling me a queer, you fool?

[Howlin]

What exactly is "pro-euthanasia?"

[Names Ash Housewares]

Why Would Gays Want Children?

Because their needs are more important then a childs.

[Howlin]

I see you nasty post was pulled, but I have to ask you this, what exactly is "pro-euthanasia?"

[scripter]

Freeper backhoe's links on gay marraige:

A Gay ( or not! ) Old Time- GM links

[Tijeras_Slim]

What exactly is "pro-euthanasia?"

You wouldn't want it to be done by well meaning amateurs, now would ya? :)

[wagglebee]

I asked to have it pulled. Pro-euthanasia is pretty self-explanatory.

[Howlin]

I think you're FOS and to even suggest that I am gay shows just how ignorant you are.

[durasell]

..... what exactly is "pro-euthanasia?"







http://www.fotosearch.com/creatas/asian-children/CRT110/

[Howlin]

Not to me it's not; you said it, how about defining it.

Are you insinuating she goes around euthanizing people?

[Howlin]

*Snicker*

[eleni121]

Thank you!!!!

Right and right on!!!

[WashingtonSource]

Bravo, Kevin, for pointing out the obvious. Ignore the gaystapo.

[dogbyte12]

Children who are "raised" by gays are sure to be the victims of physical and mental abuse. What are gays going to teach a child, the various techniques of sodomy? How to spread disease? How to be a normal parent, who reproduces and therefore propagates homo sapiens on this planet? It should be illegal for gays to have a child in their custody. Well, heterosexual parents engage in sodomy, and they get STD's. Most of the time, they don't talk to their kids about it. I am not pro gay marriage btw. I just find the overstatement to be absurd. Mostly, I think they will be teaching their kids how to potty train, read a book, dress, brush their teeth, and do math. Once they have mastered that, they then teach them all about sodomizing people in order to get diseases.

[scripter]

The subject of homosexuality and child abuse is no stranger to controversy. What the following links will tell you, and please read the data sources at each link, is that homosexuals commit a disproportionate number of child abuse cases. By no means do all homosexuals molest children. In fact the vast majority don't and find the thought repulsive. Still, the reports demonstrate homosexuals commit a disproportionate number of child abuse cases. It's disproportionate because male homosexuals represent 2.7% of the population yet they account for over 30% of molestation cases. Checkout the following links and their data sources.

'Suffer the children': ACLU continues its war on kids
Study Finds Disproportionate Percentage of Illinois Foster Child Abuse is Same Sex
Federal Panel Ignores Sex Abuse
Child sex offenders becoming bigger and bigger problem
Foster father pleads guilty to child rape, victims sue state
Phoenix Police Arrest Two Men in Child Porn Case
Molestations by homosexual foster parents: newspaper accounts vs official records
Myth and Reality about Homosexuality: Child Abuse
Myth and Reality about Homosexuality--Sexual Orientation Section, Guide to Family Issues
An Outrage, Pure and Simple!
Child Molestation and Homosexuality
Homosexual Rape and Murder of Children
Study shows link between homosexuality and pedophilia
A REAL Child Abuse Scandal
Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse
Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement
Gay Foster Parents More Apt to Molest
Homosexuality and child molestation: the link, the likelihood, the lasting effects

[wouldntbprudent]

I am sincere in wanting to discuss this (though maybe not here ;) ).

I will say this. Once I decided I would pose these questions to a very famous, articulate, erudite and open member of the gay community, who shall remain unnamed here.

She kindly answered my questions in a public forum--sort of. First, she said nothing in response to my questions as they applied to lesbians.

As to homosexual men, she more or less agreed with the irony inherent in the situations/dynamics I pointed out, she did not go so far as to engage my actual question, that is, why do homosexuals, as a community and as individuals, organize themselves into "male" and "female" members and then go about engaging in "male-female" relationships, the antithesis, supposedly, of what homosexuality is said to be about?

I admire the person I asked greatly for her intellect and honesty. So I have oftened what to make of the fact that she took on my question and actually engaged it without defensiveness or rancor, but still managed to avoid addressing its import.

[Howlin]

Your post is a prime example of why people think conservatives are nuts.