Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rogue TV Tells Sunnis 'To Eat Shias For Lunch'
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 12-10-2006 | Aqeel Hussein/Colin Freeman

Posted on 12/09/2006 6:31:34 PM PST by blam

Rogue TV tells Sunnis 'to eat Shias for lunch'

By Aqeel Hussein in Baghdad and Colin Freeman, Sunday Telegraph
Last Updated: 1:14am GMT 10/12/2006

Sporting an olive green Ba'ath Party uniform and a bushy moustache, the newsreader barks his bulletins between blasts of patriotic Saddam-era martial music.

Presenters on satellite TV channel Al Zahraa call on Sunnis to act before Shias can kill them

With his gleeful boasts about Iraqi insurgent strikes on US troops, his demeanour is reminiscent of "Comical Ali", the former information minister who famously boasted of victory as American tanks rolled into Baghdad.

For coalition commanders in Iraq, however, the most sinister aspect of his broadcasts is not the bile directed at them but the equally venomous ticker-tape that runs at the bottom of the screen.

"Chase the Shias from neighbourhood to neighbourhood," it urges. "Eat them for lunch before they eat you for dinner. Defend your houses by killing them."

So goes another broadcast on Al Zahraa, a satellite television channel catering to what is arguably one of the most unfashionable minorities in programming history – Iraq's Sunni Muslim community.

advertisement Politically marginalised ever since Saddam Hussein was deposed, it has provided a rapt audience for Al Zahraa's mix of Ba'ath Party nostalgia and dispatches from reporters with Sunni terrorist units.

Covering last month's announcement that Saddam would face the gallows for war crimes, the channel caused outrage by describing it as a "sad day for all Iraqis".

A few hours later, Iraq's Shia-dominated government shut down the station's Baghdad offices "indefinitely", accusing it of inciting violence.

The attempt at censorship backfired: the station is back on air from a secret location and freed of any obligation to broadcast responsibly.

Where once it only incited violence against the US military, the Iraqi government and Iranian-backed Shia militias, now it openly encourages attacks on the Shia population at large, acting as a cheerleader to the sectarian warfare that is claiming up to 100 lives a day.

In an interview by email with The Sunday Telegraph, an Al Zahraa spokesman revealed what officials in Washington and London have long feared, but still prefer not to acknowledge – that Sunnis and Shias are now at war.

"Let's not tell lies any more, let's tell the truth of what is inside our hearts," said Basim al Jibouri, who claims to be in hiding in Jordan. "The Shias deserve death, all of them. They deserve it because they mutilate the name of Islam and are working for Iran, the first enemy of Iraq. But they will do this over our dead bodies."

Launched late last year, Al Zahraa is one of about 30 satellite channels to take to the air in post-Saddam Iraq, where previously only state-controlled terrestrial television stations were permitted.

In the current febrile political climate, a free and independent media has not been the panacea that coalition officials hoped for. Al Zahraa is the only channel that openly advocates violence, but many others pursue unrestrained ethnic or religious agendas, deepening the sense of division.

"Many of the Shia watch it just to make themselves angry," said Ibrahim al Hassan, 23, a Shia from Baghdad. "We are waiting for the Shias to make their own channel that will be the same."

Al Zahraa's popularity illustrates the scale of the difficulties facing coalition officials.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: rogue; shias; sunnis; tv

1 posted on 12/09/2006 6:31:36 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

I believe the retort from the other camp would be-

"Eat Shia and Die!"


2 posted on 12/09/2006 6:37:00 PM PST by mikrofon (Loosely translated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikrofon

LOL - beat me.


3 posted on 12/09/2006 6:38:29 PM PST by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

Time to stand back and let the crazy baseturds fight it out -- both sides are yearning for a civil war. Our troops should not get in the middle of this or they'll be fighting both sides.


4 posted on 12/09/2006 6:47:48 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Eat Shiite...


5 posted on 12/09/2006 6:49:25 PM PST by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
Our troops should not get in the middle of this or they'll be fighting both sides.

Wouldn't be much of a change over the current situation.

But whatever you say, DO NOT CALL IT A CIVIL WAR!
6 posted on 12/09/2006 6:49:45 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg
"But whatever you say, DO NOT CALL IT A CIVIL WAR!"

A religious war?

7 posted on 12/09/2006 6:59:18 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam
"A religious war?"

Shhhhh.... someone may hear you...

It's been a "religious" war from the git go...

Only the chronically P.C. damaged have refused to acknowledge that...

Remember our own President -- informed us that Islam is a religion of Peace...

At that moment - our President lost credibility, believability and my confidence..

Semper Fi

8 posted on 12/09/2006 7:07:35 PM PST by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam

An UNcivil war?


9 posted on 12/09/2006 7:07:52 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam

With all of our high-tech gear we cannot figure out where this station is broadcasting from? I doubt that.


10 posted on 12/09/2006 7:08:24 PM PST by elhombrelibre (Democrats are always more comfortable hating Republicans than hating America's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
A religious war?

A rose by any other name still kills the neighbor.
11 posted on 12/09/2006 7:21:55 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam

Can't we disable the satelites that broadcast this crap?


12 posted on 12/09/2006 7:27:41 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg; blam

Civil Wars are often religious wars, look at the Cavalier/Roundhead battles in English history or the N. Ireland troubles (which are the best approximation to what's happening in Iraq).


13 posted on 12/09/2006 7:38:12 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam

Why we give credence to 12th century renegades is beyond me! What these clowns don't realize is that if the full power of the US military was released, if it were not held in check by the liberal do-gooders, they would be eliminated from the face of the earth in days if not hours..........


14 posted on 12/09/2006 7:46:48 PM PST by ErieGeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: river rat

One of George Bush's greatest failings is that he is more concerned about upsetting those who will always hate him than he is upsetting his base.


15 posted on 12/09/2006 7:51:38 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
It's all the same thing.

sunni and shia are going to keep slaughtering each other whether we are there or not. The only thing that kept them in check was fearing hussein more than they hate each other.

Our warriors are not feared sufficiently to stop the killing.

The slaughter may be temporarily suppressed somewhat, but when we finally pull out, in six months or sixteen years, they are going to go right back to the mohammedans second favorite past time.

Since there are no jews in the immediate area to murder, they will turn on each other.
16 posted on 12/09/2006 8:00:28 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blam

This is what Bush gets for not smashing the "insurgents" with an iron fist.


17 posted on 12/09/2006 8:08:58 PM PST by SeƱor Zorro ("The ability to speak does not make you intelligent"--Qui-Gon Jinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson