Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mary Cheney's Pregnancy Affects Us All
Townhall ^ | December 7, 2006 | Janice Shaw Crouse PhD, Concerned Women for America

Posted on 12/08/2006 8:31:16 PM PST by rakovskii

Mary Cheney’s pregnancy poses problems not just for her child, but also for all Americans. Her action repudiates traditional values and sets an appalling example for young people at a time when father absence is the most pressing social problem facing the nation. With 37 percent of American children born to fatherless families, Mary Cheney is contributing to a trend that is detrimental to all Americans who will live with the ramifications of millions of children whose anger and frustration at not knowing their father will be felt in the public schools and communities of our nation.

Mary Cheney is among that burgeoning group of adult women over age 20 that are driving the trend of women who don’t want a man in the picture, but want to have a baby. These older women are pushing out-of-wedlock birth statistics higher and higher. At a time when teen births and teen abortions are declining dramatically, older women are having more un-wed births and more abortions, including repeat abortions (indicating that they are using abortion as birth control).

Well-educated, professional Mary Cheney is flying in the face of the accumulated wisdom of the top experts who agree that the very best family structure for a child’s well-being is a married mom and dad family. Her child will have all the material advantages it will need, but it will still encounter the emotional devastation common to children without fathers.

One Georgia high school principal reported, “We have too many young men and women from single-mother families that don’t have the role models at home to teach them how to deal with adversity and handle responsibility. They’ve seen their mom work 60 hours a week just to put food on the table; they end up fending for themselves.”

When fatherless children get to be teens, the girls tend to start looking for love in all the wrong places and the boys tend to find as their role model the bad-boy celebrities of MTV, NFL and NBA.

As they grow older, fatherless children tend to have trouble dealing with male authority figures. Too often children in single-mother households end up angry at their absent fathers and resentful of the mother who has had to be a father figure, too. Typically, the boys who have a love-hate relationship with their mother end up hating all women. Numerous of them look for vulnerable women where they can act out their anger and be in control.

Mary Cheney’s action sets an example that is detrimental for mothers with less financial resources who will start down an irrevocable path into poverty that tends to be generational –– children in households without a father tend to themselves have unwed births later in life. Experts from both the left and the right cite a disastrous litany of negative outcomes that are predictable when a child grows up in a fatherless family. Such children tend to get involved in drugs, alcohol abuse, and delinquency; they tend to drop out of school and have teen pregnancies. An assistant principal in a Junior High School said that many of the behavioral problems that teachers face in the classroom stem from households without a father’s influence.

Mary’s pregnancy is an “in-your-face” action countering the Bush Administration’s pro-family, pro-marriage and pro-life policies. She continues to repudiate the work to which her father has devoted his life. Mary has repeatedly said that “studies” show that children only need a loving home. Her statement is incomplete because the experts agree that for the well-being of children, they desperately need a married father and a mother.

All those people who talk about doing what is best “for our children” need to get back to the basics: children need a married mom and dad. Children can do without a lot of the trimmings of childhood, but nothing can replace a home where the mother and dad love each other enough to commit for a lifetime and are absolutely crazy about their kids –– enough to be willing to sacrifice their own needs to see that their children get the very best.

Janice Shaw Crouse, Ph.D., Senior Fellow at the Beverly LaHaye Institute, a culturally conservative think tank for Concerned Women for America, is a recognized authority on domestic issues, the United Nations, cultural and women’s concerns.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: antifamily; antifamilyvalues; cheney; fatherlesschild; gay; heterosexualagenda; homosexual; homosexualagenda; marycheney; pregnancy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 781-795 next last
To: rakovskii

TURKEY BASTER METHOD (NEEDLELESS SYRINGE)

Rome.

301 posted on 12/08/2006 11:25:08 PM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

So?

Gays existed long before Marx.

I'm not impressed by your pasting skills.


302 posted on 12/08/2006 11:25:26 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser (Pro Evolution, Pro Stem Cell Research, Pro Science, Pro Free Thought, and Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
By 37 a woman is reaching a point of declining viable egg production; especially if she has never had a child. Yes, people live longer than they used to, but no matter how "good" a shape one is in, a mother who is pushing 40, is no spring chicken.

Again, 100% right. As a 37 year old, I know first hand as well. And, I know that with each passing year, the odds continue to sharply decline- and not in my favor.

303 posted on 12/08/2006 11:26:18 PM PST by rintense (Liberals stand for nothing and are against everything- unless it benefits them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
What's your opinion of a situation that would see young children in the next room as men hold an open orgy just outside their bedroom door?

Parents who do that near the bedroom of their children are not good parents. I stipulate to that. How many gays who have kids in their homes do that in the room next door, or just in the hallway outside, is the next question, and is it a higher percentage than of heteros? I have yet another request for creditable data. So many assertions, and no damn creditable peer reviewed data, I hate when that happens!

304 posted on 12/08/2006 11:26:31 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

So anything that people want to do is okay with you then right?

Beastiality would be okay. After all it's a private thing. People should be able to do what they want.

Adopting and abusing children would be okay. After all there are lots of things you can do that won't show up, and it is within the new family. No problem there...

It would be interesting to know just what you'd be willing to tolerate as long as it took place in the family setting. We've already seen that you don't mind if flaming homosexuals hold orgies in the presence of children? What else don't you mind?


305 posted on 12/08/2006 11:27:04 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: dakine

Good point!


306 posted on 12/08/2006 11:27:08 PM PST by loboinok (Gun control is hitting what you aim at!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew
If they keep their kid locked in the basement for twenty years, it ain't my business either.

Fallacy. You are talking about a criminal act of imprisonment and abuse. I could use the same logic to claim that homeschooling kids to be ignorant is abuse.

307 posted on 12/08/2006 11:27:27 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser (Pro Evolution, Pro Stem Cell Research, Pro Science, Pro Free Thought, and Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: dakine; Torie; nopardons; rintense; central scrutinizer
Have you read some of the posters around here? They have kids too!....

Post of the Day!!!!

308 posted on 12/08/2006 11:28:17 PM PST by Howlin (42 days to Destin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; norge
I'm glad I had a few glasses of wine tonight, or this thread would be UNBEARABLE.

I'm about to have an adult beverage myself...

But really...check out post #188...norge is very inspirational! Puts the rest of this lot in perspective!!

309 posted on 12/08/2006 11:28:54 PM PST by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
Gays existed long before Marx.

It wasn't Groucho's fault. He was hetero.

310 posted on 12/08/2006 11:29:34 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Not only that, almost every story you see of an abused child or even a dead child, it is without fail the father or boy friend of the mother that does the deed.

As many of these as I have read, for the life of me I can't recall hearing of one GAY couple having the same situation in their homes.


311 posted on 12/08/2006 11:31:30 PM PST by Howlin (42 days to Destin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: loboinok

I stand by my post, I think that Haggard is a hypocrite. I think that with an open mind based upon the fact that he lived a lie and lied to his wife and messed up his kids.

Nothing close minded about that fact, Haggard is a hypocrite, as are his followers that are still in denial about it.


312 posted on 12/08/2006 11:32:17 PM PST by Central Scrutiniser (Pro Evolution, Pro Stem Cell Research, Pro Science, Pro Free Thought, and Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy
Well that would be refreshing. Maybe then "conservatives" would consider that perhaps the largest threat to children is coming from heterosexuals, particularly single mothers having children they can't provide for...and worse, our government is funding this behavior with free medical care, food, transportation, etc.

You bring up some good points. As I have said - lots of people who probably shouldn't have children - do. And they are free to. What isn't happening in the case of welfare mom's is for those women (and men) to experience the consequences of their choices.

I have no idea what the statistics are but I suspect there are an awful lot of people having children for selfish reasons or other less than admirable reasons.

313 posted on 12/08/2006 11:33:17 PM PST by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: paulat

I read it.

I'm going to have to go with some of you on this thread: I now have five grandchildren under six years of age; if one of them is gay, I will love them just as much as I do this very minute.

Of course, it would break my heart that they will have to deal with people like some of the posters on this thread.


314 posted on 12/08/2006 11:34:10 PM PST by Howlin (42 days to Destin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Either FR has become saturated with homosexualist supporters of the radical gay agenda, or conservatives are becoming libertines, or FR is becoming the hangout for "fiscal conservative/social liberals", which turn into fiscal liberals anyway. Since their socially liberal ideas create such hell that money is needed to pay for all the AIDS drugs, fatherless children, and mayhem in the streets.

Bingo and bump!
315 posted on 12/08/2006 11:34:11 PM PST by loboinok (Gun control is hitting what you aim at!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
No, my argument is that the aristocracy and the poor have engaged in adultery and even premarital sex for millennia. The pendulum swings and times change. When things get too far off one way, they swing back the other way. What do you think brought on the what we erroneously call ( because it actually happened BEFORE Victoria ever took the throne! ) Victorian morality? And that was NOT an isolated instance; BTW.

What made Augustus ( once he put by OCTAVIAN ) institute the marriage and moral laws?

Puritan, used to invoke prudery, is a complete falsehood!

316 posted on 12/08/2006 11:34:15 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

Gay parenting is already a done deal. Get used to it.


317 posted on 12/08/2006 11:35:19 PM PST by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: paulat

There are many norge like stories on FR. Heck, many freepers have that same norge story! But the hollier-than-thou crowd would rather believe that these 'success' stories are rare and are exceptions to the rule.


318 posted on 12/08/2006 11:35:58 PM PST by rintense (Liberals stand for nothing and are against everything- unless it benefits them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser
As for all the needy kids in America, I sure don't see a whole pile of conservatives rallying around to put their money where their mouths are and going out and adopting these kids. re: Adam and Eve/Adam and Steve, that is tired old schtick. There was no Adam and Eve, it was a story designed to teach.

For someone who is pro-free thought, you certainly do trot out the tired, cynical lefty cliches.

319 posted on 12/08/2006 11:36:34 PM PST by Albion Wilde (...where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. -2 Cor 3:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Central Scrutiniser

See, you have everything categorized. A crime you say! Isn't blasphemy a crime? Is your world view merely dictated by civil authority? Are you a slave? An automaton?

I remember a show about the Fatty Arbuckle scandal, I think it was. Somehow, homosexuality was involved. Someone commented on the mores of the time - "Homosexuality was worse than anything - worse than murder." That always impressed me. Everything is up in the air.


320 posted on 12/08/2006 11:36:49 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 781-795 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson