Skip to comments.
Using the Delphi Technique to Achieve Consensus [or How the Left builds consensus]
Eagle Forum ^
| November 1998
| Lynn Stuter
Posted on 12/07/2006 9:39:55 AM PST by Antoninus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
To: Antoninus
Exactly - see "Global Warming"
41
posted on
12/07/2006 11:01:53 AM PST
by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
To: Billthedrill
You do see this a lot on the 'net and occasionally on FR, usually practiced by someone who only asks questions, a technique also prevalent within the "Critical Thinking" curricula. I have been to a number of "critical thinking" workshops, and indeed just conducted one where I work. In principle, and in the hands of an honest teacher, it is not only anodyne but produces better citizens. Students learn to ask questions like "What is the quality of the evidence?", "Are there any emotional words that are not defined?", etc.
Alas, the harm comes when what students are asked to be critical of never changes. For the higher-ed crit-think community (and it is fairly large) "critical thinking" always seems to amount to arguments for bigger government, encouragement to reason purely in terms of group identities rather than individuals, etc. Invariably, recognizably conservative arguments are used as raw material for "critical thinking." It's really sort of scandalous.
When I first started to seriously engage in that kind of Socratic interrogation in my classrom I used to use mostly arguments from the left as raw material. I eventually decided that, as satisfying as it was, the ideal teacher in this kind of critical-thinking process is one whose politics are unknown to the student. It is of course easy to say and hard to do.
To: Antoninus
I've run across those same people. However if you push them enough, more than a few lapse into name-calling and irrelevancy which totally outs their lib mindset.
43
posted on
12/07/2006 11:12:35 AM PST
by
cinives
(On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
To: Antoninus
Thanks, I'll ping the list later. I've been sitting here waay too long. Duty calls.
To: Antoninus
Delphi technique bump. School superintendents are experts at this.
45
posted on
12/07/2006 11:20:52 AM PST
by
Aquinasfan
(When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
To: Antoninus
"I remember him. I can think of about a dozen other current frequent posters who refuse to be nailed down on any issue, but happily excoriate those they consider 'extremists'. These 'extremists', not surprisingly, are almost always the social conservatives among us."
Where's the "Hammer Meets Nail" graphic when you need it!
To: Aquinasfan
Delphi technique bump. School superintendents are experts at this.
Good point. This probably needs to be bumped to the home school list as well....
47
posted on
12/07/2006 11:22:44 AM PST
by
Antoninus
(Rudy as nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media love him?)
To: Antoninus
"In group settings, the Delphi Technique is an unethical method of achieving consensus on controversial topics. It requires well-trained professionals, known as "facilitators" or "change agents," who deliberately escalate tension among group members, pitting one faction against another to make a preordained viewpoint appear "sensible," while making opposing views appear ridiculous."aka the MSM
To: Lurker
I've seen it in action in NC local politics.
Just keep asking the same question, it drives them nuts.
49
posted on
12/07/2006 11:33:29 AM PST
by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: Antoninus
Interesting technique. Bookmark for later printing.
50
posted on
12/07/2006 11:39:55 AM PST
by
IrishCatholic
(No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
To: Antoninus; Robert A. Cook, PE
Just added to my bookmarks so I don't lose it again...Good idea. I should ping this thread when I have a few others. I've been seeing this crap in our politics since the 1960s. An alternative title is "How the left became so moonbat."
51
posted on
12/07/2006 12:26:00 PM PST
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: Antoninus
Bumping for later reading.
To: Antoninus
Thanks for the ping. This was an interesting read. Sounds exactly like what the Left is doing, especially with the topic of "same-sex marriage." My husband and I often have discussed how clever they are and how gullible the general public is.
53
posted on
12/07/2006 1:08:23 PM PST
by
Tired of Taxes
(That's taxes, not Texas. I have no beef with TX. NJ has the highest property taxes in the nation.)
To: Tired of Taxes
Thanks for the ping. This was an interesting read. Sounds exactly like what the Left is doing, especially with the topic of "same-sex marriage." My husband and I often have discussed how clever they are and how gullible the general public is.
You should have seen how they manipulated the McGreevey thing here in NJ. If you watched the news, you would have thought that people were actually proud of him for coming out and abandoning his wife and child. It was all the fault of an intolerant system that he couldn't continue to serve as governor.
Very little mention of the fact that he was buggering an Israeli national who he then promoted to a sensitive state security post. The man is an absolute disgrace.
54
posted on
12/07/2006 1:19:36 PM PST
by
Antoninus
(Rudy as nominee = President Hillary. Why else do you think the media love him?)
To: Antoninus; All
55
posted on
12/07/2006 1:40:26 PM PST
by
backhoe
(Just an Old Keyboard Cowboy, Ridin' the Trakball into the Dawn of Information)
To: Lurker
There are a number of infiltrators on this board who masquerade as 'questioning' conservatives purely aiming to divide us and to get each other to fight with each other. They're probing to find out what works, what doesn't, what makes us fight amongst ourselves and which of their lies will work.It is very subtle and, now, they will be 'funded' to maintain this strategy throughout the next election at which time they won't need it anymore because they will have all three branches.
56
posted on
12/07/2006 1:45:37 PM PST
by
Gaffer
To: untenured
Many thanks for a fascinating reply. I have long held that critical thinking bears the same relationship to Critical Thinking as libertarian does to Libertarian. If it's certified and wrapped in a package it probably isn't entirely the real thing.
I'd love to have taken one of your classes!
To: Freedom4US
Agreed.
But, it COULD still be used by conservatives in a conservative way for conservative goals. Just as conservatives can use communist plumbing when touring Moscow.
58
posted on
12/07/2006 2:26:55 PM PST
by
Quix
(LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
To: Antoninus
I live in NJ. Yes, the way they handled the McGreevey story was absolutely amazing. He knew exactly what speech to deliver to garner sympathy. The Democrats are very talented at being spin doctors.
59
posted on
12/07/2006 4:12:02 PM PST
by
Tired of Taxes
(That's taxes, not Texas. I have no beef with TX. NJ has the highest property taxes in the nation.)
To: Canticle_of_Deborah
Hmmm, I could name a few...
60
posted on
12/07/2006 5:44:37 PM PST
by
murphE
(These are days when the Christian is expected to praise every creed but his own. --G.K. Chesterton)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson