Posted on 12/04/2006 10:37:25 PM PST by TheConservativeCitizen
Throughout history one of the main dynamics that has influenced relationships between men and women is what can be called the “vagina monopoly.” Men want them and only women have them. In fact, the world’s oldest profession was one that was originally only capable of being performed by women. That profession was the “renting” of women to men for sex. Most of the pathological aspects in male-female relationships revolve around the objectification of women as objects of sexual gratification.
Originally, feminism was about changing attitudes, particularly that women are of equal dignity as men. Women can be just as capable to become doctors, lawyers, CEOs or politicians. Far from being merely sperm receptacles, they are people entitled to the full balance of human dignity. The rallying call of these feminists was “love me for my mind, not just my body.”
Those days are long gone. Enter groups such as the Feminist Majority at the University of Illinois. The motto of this group and those like it can be described as “love me for my body … PLEASE!” The slogans they chose to put on their T-shirts revolve around sex toys and genitalia. In psychology this would be called a “fixation.”
Women traditionally have been looked upon as sexual objects. So what do these neofeminists do? Celebrate and proclaim liberation in being a sex object, of course. Frat boys on campus look at these poor girls as a vagina on two legs and they want to slap that idea on a T-shirt and sell it. They’ve gone one step further from the prostitution of women to preaching harlotry. The difference between a prostitute and a harlot is that the prostitute at least has enough self respect to demand payment for services rendered.
What the “patriarchy” has tried to establish for centuries is whole-heartedly embraced and celebrated, ironically, by self-styled icons of feminism. The results of such puerile notions have been nothing short of tragic.
Every study on the subject has shown that women who buy into the inner-slut mentality of neofeminism are devastated. They suffer from depression, low self-esteem, STDs, single motherhood and they generally feel rejected in life. They grow into jaded women who think that the path to fulfillment is in imitating the worst men among us.
College-aged women can entertain notions of promiscuity-as-fulfillment because society has always lusted after the young woman. However, as they age they find fewer and fewer partners. They’ve become “cold product” and are discarded in favor of “younger models.”
It has lead to the rejection of the biggest trait distinctive of women - motherhood. The senseless slaughter of children for the sake of sexual convenience (about 99 percent of all abortions according to the Guttmacher Institute) ranks first among the horrors in the history of humanity. More children have been murdered through abortion than any other genocide in human history. Abortion makes the Holocaust look like a petty crime in comparison.
It is time for a thorough re-evaluation of neofeminism in the light of the human wreckage strewn in its wake. Luckily there are women out there who are discovering that the path to fulfillment does not lie in the inner-slut myth.
Books such as Dawn Eden’s “Thrill of the Chaste,” Wendy Shalit’s “A Return to Modesty,” and others are reexamining the role of sexuality in a woman’s life and are finding that a sequence of unfulfilling anonymous sexual encounters are not at all empowering.
The case for sexual fidelity has never been stronger. Women are finding that sexual fulfillment isn’t found in anonymous sexual encounters or relationships that generate only from physically satisfying sexual escapades, but is found from the lifelong, permanent and complete union of marriage.
Being free from the Friday-night quests to the local syphilis buffet for Mr. Right Now means that women are free to pursue being doctors, lawyers, and being all-around great women. You know … all those opportunities that feminism was supposed to create.
Well put. Exactly!
As a rabid anti-feminist, I agree with you. BUT...where are the men on this? Men are a big part of the problem, but refuse to see it.
bump
You got those cool soft round thingies farther up, too.
(Ducking and running for cover....)
L
"Men are a big part of the problem, but refuse to see it."
Refuse to see what?
We're here, brother ... trying not to be an isolationist.
Great article - thanks for posting it. While women are turning into sluts, while it being seemingly acceptable in this day and age, one thing hasn't changed: You bed the bad girls but marry the good ones. Or has it?
Nah, don't run for cover, that's OK.....LOL
I remember reading a while ago that society is dependant on "girl's saying no". I still agree.
Was it Dear Abby or Ann Landers who said why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?
What the Fairer is capable of, even in these days of "equality" is, frankly, stunning.
If women would just be women, with the right eye-contact, they would rule the world surreptitiously. Their gifts are, well, organic, and us culturally-emasculated still react accordingly.
They used to, you know.
I always believed that when women hold out for Sex and submit themselves
to a man they love, they both will have a future together.
Part of that structure also relies on a woman's instinct and control.
After all, most men will work their collective butts off to come home
to a submissive woman.
IMHO...
LOL yes, one them said that. It is so true.
oops, one of the ladies said that.
Not what I said, sir.
So sad, look how she is huched over. What a miserable way to have to go out into the world. If the Muslim women would wake up they could change the world.
I was watching a tv show recently with my in-laws and wife and some girls were throwing themselves at some guy. My father-in-law and I both said "girls are stupid" and our wives didn't say a word (they knew we were right-at least this time).
It seems that girls (women) are so desperate to have a guy that they give away their bodies with no thought to the consequence. What if they have a baby? Is they guy who only wants her body going to be around to love and care for her baby?
I agree with whoever said: It's a woman's job to domesticate a man and a man's job to protect a woman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.