Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumsfeld Memo Proposed 'Major Adjustment' in Iraq
New York Times ^ | December 3, 2006 | MICHAEL R. GORDON and DAVID S. CLOUD

Posted on 12/02/2006 1:20:05 PM PST by Sub-Driver

Rumsfeld Memo Proposed ‘Major Adjustment’ in Iraq By MICHAEL R. GORDON and DAVID S. CLOUD WASHINGTON, Dec. 2 — Two days before he resigned as defense secretary, Donald H. Rumsfeld submitted a classified memo to the White House that acknowledged that the Bush administration’s strategy in Iraq was not working and called for a major course correction.

“In my view it is time for a major adjustment,” wrote Mr. Rumsfeld, who has been a symbol of a dogged stay-the-course policy. “Clearly, what U.S. forces are currently doing in Iraq is not working well enough or fast enough.”

Nor did Mr. Rumsfeld seem confident that the administration would readily develop an effective alternative. To limit the political fallout from shifting course he suggested the administration consider a campaign to lower public expectations.

“Announce that whatever new approach the U.S. decides on, the U.S. is doing so on a trial basis,” he wrote. “This will give us the ability to readjust and move to another course, if necessary, and therefore not ‘lose.’ ”

“Recast the U.S. military mission and the U.S. goals (how we talk about them) — go minimalist,” he added. Mr. Rumsfeld’s memo suggests frustration with the pace of turning over responsibility to the Iraqi authorities; in fact, the memo calls for examination of ideas that roughly parallel troop withdrawal proposals presented by some of the White House’s sharpest Democratic critics. (Text of the Memo)

The memo’s discussion of possible troop reduction options offers a counterpoint to Mr. Rumsfeld’s frequent public suggestions that discussions about force levels are driven by requests from American military commanders.

Instead, the memo puts on the table several ideas for troop redeployments or withdrawals that appear to conflict with recent public pronouncements from commanders in Iraq emphasizing the need to maintain troop levels.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: anotherrathergate; forgedmemo; iraq; rumsfeld
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: OldFriend

I think both abizaid and casey, are doing a poor job.

the "generals" don't like Rumsfeld, they never have. Rummy wanted to transform the military - smaller, lighter forces. The establishment at the Pentagon wants the "big" military - big forces, big operations, and the big budget projects that go along with them.

what this memo highlights to me - is the lack of cohesiveness Bush faces within his own administration. there is no consensus plan to reach an endgame in iraq - DoD itself has different approaches, State has their own agenda and plans, the intel agencies are doing something else.


81 posted on 12/02/2006 8:33:29 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Fortunately the President will listen to the generals who are fighting the war.


82 posted on 12/02/2006 8:46:42 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

fortunately? the same generals that tell us, every 6 months, that iraqi forces need "just 12 more months" of training.

and who set the rules of engagement our troops follow now? who continues to assign them to high risk, low value tasks like checkpoint and convoy duty, where they are cut to ribbons by car bombs and IEDs? are "the generals" you want Bush to listen to, making those decisions?


83 posted on 12/02/2006 8:50:58 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Those are the generals who won the major operations war and will win the war against the terrorist insurgency represented by Iran, Syria, Al Qaeda and the Iraqi factions they use. It is the generals and the troops who win the wars, of course with the leadership of the one and only Commander in Chief; the President, not the secretary of defense nor the politicians, nor the judges, nor the media, and nor the armed chair generals.
84 posted on 12/02/2006 8:57:14 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

1) How long has the NYT known about this memo?

2) why are they writing an article in defense of Rummy ?

3) Murtha didn't suggest moving troops to other cities to safer areas in Iraq or Kuwait


85 posted on 12/02/2006 8:57:25 PM PST by Mo1 (Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

yes, phase 1 of the war was fine.

phase 2, the post-saddam phase - has not succeeded. it hasn't failed, but it hasn't succeeded. it has left us in this "limbo" state we've seen for the last 1+ years.

Bush needs to read this memo. there are some solid ideas here, and they represent an approach that is different from the surrender of the Baker plan, and the stalemate and political implosion of "stay the course".


86 posted on 12/02/2006 9:03:30 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

President Bush already read the memo, he consulted with his generals and he will follow the plan agreed upon by the generals..


87 posted on 12/02/2006 9:39:25 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Deo et Patria

Actually, I would argue that when media (e.g., embedded reporters) were there with our troops, they saw what smart, professional and hardworking folks we have fighting for our freedom.

It's when these idiot media types all sit around at Hotel Baghdad with no access to anything but the latest explosion down the street staged by terrorists for their benefit that things get bad. And if they were banned from Hotel Baghdad, they'd all be over sitting in the bar at Hotel Kuwait City, developing a gin-and-group-think fueled, shared interpretation of the war that has no bearing on reality. PJ O'Roarke has written a ton about how conventional wisdom on world conflict gets decided by a whole bunch of lemming reporters in hotel bars. It would be funnier if it weren't so dangerous.


88 posted on 12/03/2006 12:33:05 AM PST by ellery (The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

And I'm guessing that the people currently rewarding bad behavior with reconstruction funds are all at the State Dept. This memo could almost be summarized thusly: "Stop doing things the State Dept. way in Iraq!"


89 posted on 12/03/2006 12:35:52 AM PST by ellery (The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts. - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
We will have to agree to disagree! The mission is outlined by the President and the Secretary of Defense and the military is called upon to carry out that mission.

The initial battle plan to depose Saddam Hussein was brilliant and brilliantly executed.

No setting the oil fields afire, no poisoned water, no bridges bombed, no stopping along the way to engage his military, which would have allowed Baghdad to be protected.

Big deal, there was looting. As if that made any difference at all in the fall of Saddam Hussein.

What followed is being dealt with, not perfectly, but no one ever expected the country to be pacified overnight.

There have been elections, large portions of Iraq are relatively safe, despite the media focus on Baghdad.

90 posted on 12/03/2006 4:34:58 AM PST by OldFriend (FALLEN HERO JEFFREY TOCZYLOWSKI, REST IN PEACE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
It's not the generals with a command that dislike Rumsfeld. It's the generals sitting aorund the Pentagon with no command who are being phase out of their cushy do nothing jobs that are disgruntled. They don't care about security, patriotism, or anything other than their own comfort.

Do you really believe Shinseki, Zinni, Weasley Clark are the type of general this country needs.

Are they to be trusted with the security of the civilized world?

Are you so naive that you think every general in the Pentagon puts America first?

91 posted on 12/03/2006 4:43:21 AM PST by OldFriend (FALLEN HERO JEFFREY TOCZYLOWSKI, REST IN PEACE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

I agree...so why did they let him go or did he really resign?


92 posted on 12/03/2006 9:15:19 AM PST by amutr22 (Remember....Friend's Don't Let Friends Vote Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

President Bush already read the memo, he consulted with his generals and he will follow the plan agreed upon by the generals..



I always like reading your posts, jveritas.
Can you tell me what is that plan by the generals? Can you provide me a link or surmise that? Is it any different than what we've been doing?

This President needs to do something soon and not just
"stay the course"...it's not working any more. I want success here...as most of us do...but right now ...it's not looking real successful.


93 posted on 12/03/2006 9:37:37 AM PST by amutr22 (Remember....Friend's Don't Let Friends Vote Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: amutr22

I just don't know the answer to that. I have never been able to bring myself to be okay with it.


94 posted on 12/03/2006 9:38:53 AM PST by Bahbah (Regev, Goldwasser and Shalit, we are praying for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
TOP SECRET
Read and destroy:

Rumsfeld's memo is important because this is the weekend and there is no other news. Nothing ever happens on the weekend.

95 posted on 12/03/2006 9:41:05 AM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amutr22

I do not know the details with the Chief of Staff and the generals plan, but the main thing is that " We are not leaving Iraq", "We are not cutting down the troops", "We are going to speed up the training of Iraqi forces".


96 posted on 12/03/2006 9:41:09 AM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

and how do you know which "team" of generals Abizaid and Casey are on? just because they have a command, doesn't make them infallible. far from it.


97 posted on 12/03/2006 6:20:03 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

and what plan is that? the plan that so hamstrings our forces with rules of engagement in Al Anbar? the plan that keeps Sadr alive, and removes cordons from Sadr City? the plan that keeps US forces in high risk/low values assignments like convoy duty?

I don't even know what the plan is anymore. all I know is, the defintion of insanity is doing the same thing day after day, and expecting different results. another 5 KIA this weekend.


98 posted on 12/03/2006 6:24:01 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
There is some good news regarding al Anbar. Not heavily published.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1747546/posts

Our Marines are going to get some, and the reports of dead women and children will be rampant. Sucks to be them. Until the Iraqis stand up and nut up, s#it happens. This was planned months ago. I fully support whatever means are used. If there are more prosecutions of Marines for killing people, then we simply need to get our Marines the hell out. They kill people and break things for a living. And do it better than any mothers son on the face of the Earth.
99 posted on 12/03/2006 6:35:03 PM PST by ARealMothersSonForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Not infallible, simply not in the camp of hating Rumsfeld.


100 posted on 12/04/2006 4:47:08 AM PST by OldFriend (FALLEN HERO JEFFREY TOCZYLOWSKI, REST IN PEACE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson