Posted on 12/01/2006 4:23:34 PM PST by Nicholas Conradin
Heehee!
"... a little wider view of history."
Or a fictional one.
Interesting that the Islamophile is on second. It should have been the other way around.
Yup! You're naive all right. But that's OK. There are NO illusions about Nuclear Weapons. When it all goes down, the USA will do it right, this time! This time IS, the last time.
Stay well armed and safe...............FRegards
Ultimately all history is false. Only outright fiction is true.
bump
Apparently Karen Armstrong is describing an Islam that exists only in her peace filled fantasies of the Prophet. It does NOT describe the death cult he founded that is practiced by hundreds of thousands world wide.
Just watched the Robert Spencer segment. He's brilliant! Quick! ... Somebody draft him to run for president in 2008.
I'm watching the Karen Armstrong segment.
She seems to be in a servile ecstacy in explaining what a fantastic
guy Mohammed was.
Aside from being a suck-up to the Islamics, the affectations in
her delivery are good for a couple of chuckles.
She needs to watch the PBS show that appeared soon after 9-11 on Mohammed.
I think it was titled something like "Legacy of A Prophet".
Although an apologist puff-piece funded by Muslims (Saudis), it
revealed Mohammed to be a good leader of thugs, great in acuquisitions
and having assistants that pulled his chestnuts out of the fire a
few times.
In other words, a smart, lucky guy.
Sort of like L. Ron Hubbard without a scimitar.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.