Posted on 11/30/2006 12:06:20 PM PST by Dark Skies
Two years ago, movie director Theo van Gogh’s throat was cut on a street in Amsterdam in the name of radical Islam. I had partaken in his last work, Submission, where we represented, in the most accurate way possible, the condition of Muslim women: tyranny, humiliations, violence. In this film, we showed Muslim women who had finally rebelled, talking to God in a tone of defiance. It made Imam Fawaz of the Hague scream with hate during the delivery of a vengeful sermon. My friend Theo, the “criminal bastard”, was subsequently riddled with bullets and stabbed to death with a dagger.
Resident Fellow Ayaan Hirsi Ali
At the beginning of this November, the trial of the members of a violent Islamic network in the Netherlands entered its final phase. And an entire society today asks itself questions about the integration of its immigrants. While I reside in the United States at present--I’m well-protected here--the invectives of the Imam still ring in my ear, calling for the punishment of Theo, and promising me a Divine curse in the form of blindness combined with cancer of the tongue and cancer of the brain.
Time has passed. After a bad quarrel regarding my Dutch naturalization and my resignation from the Dutch Parliament, I was rapidly rehabilitated. Here I am, once again a Dutch citizen, an émigrée in the United States. Whatever one may say of it, the United States remains in many regards the greatest champion of liberty. At the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, I have more time and more means to diffuse my ideas.
People ask me incessantly what it’s like to live with perpetual death threats. This question is most often asked by Westerners, with the naiveté of those who consider life to be naturally peaceful. Born in Somalia, the daughter of an opponent of Siyad Barré’s dictatorship, I grew up in my country, then in Saudi-Arabia and in Kenya in an environment in which death invited itself without end. A virus, a bacterium, a parasite, a drought, a famine, a civil war, soldiers, torturers: death could take all forms and hit anyone, anytime. When I had malaria, I got well again. When I was circumcised, my wound transformed into scar tissue, and I survived. When my Qur’an teacher fractured my skull, doctors saved me. A bandit put the blade of his knife against my throat: I’m still alive, and more of a rebel than ever before.
I remember Saudi-Arabia where, under the cover of purity, our most minor gestures were haunted by sin and fear: hangings, the cutting off of hands, women controlled and stoned to death, such was and such remains the everyday life of that country. The respect for the literal words of the Prophet is incompatible with human rights, in contradiction to philosophy of classical liberalism. Submerged in a medieval mentality, numerous Muslim countries profit from Western technological advances, pretending to ignore that these advances find their very origin in Enlightenment-thinking. It’s this blindness coupled with hypocrisy that renders the transition towards modernity a most arduous one for the faithful. I quit the world of faith, genital mutilation and forced marriage for that of reason and sexual emancipation. I made the journey towards human rights. At present, I know that one of these two worlds is simply better than the other.
Some, in the West, find such a distinction to be politically incorrect, but it’s necessary to realize that it is Islam which is most traumatized by fundamentalism, not the Western world. Europe only feels the shock waves because of immigration and globalization. It’s by making morality relative and by affirming the equality of cultures that a number of Western intellectuals embark on the path, without realizing it themselves, of self-destruction. Three concepts are at the heart of your culture: 1) freedom of the individual as an end in and of itself, 2) rationality, 3) separation of the scientific and the religious.
Created on a humanist base, your institutions are the expression of the life here on earth, while Islamic philosophy, rejecting individual freedom, submits the individual to God. On Islamic soil, rationality and science enter into a conflict with the Qur’an: any innovation becomes unacceptable. The government cannot be founded on the thought of man: life on earth, after all, is only temporary. It’s necessary to invest in the hereafter. Islam is a cult of the hereafter. Such is the veritable schism with the West: the two world views are incompatible. I, personally, have opted for life in the here and now.
When I was a child in Somalia, under the tree where she braided, my grandmother told us stories and asked us questions, in order to know if we had understood the concept: being able to recognize the enemy, in particular. She told me: “It’s a very useful instinct. If you don’t know what you have to fear, you will not survive.” And when she caught me in flagrante delicto of incomprehension, she called me doqon! This word means two things: being foolish and naïve. We said, in Somalia: “Stupid like a date palm tree!” Dates from that tree are treasures, and the one who loses them is an imbecile.
No, Europe is not traumatized by Islam, but she is like a date palm tree which despoils itself, foolish and naïve. Things fall. She remains inert. Worse, she gives freedom to the enemies of freedom. At the heart of your beautiful West, it is the right-thinking people with a socializing tendency who do this the most, in the spirit of pacifism, voluntary blindness and conformism, when confronted with the rise of fundamentalism, when confronted with the aggressiveness of radicals, when confronted with the dangers of communitarianism. Stupid. Like the data palm tree. Please: don’t be doqon.
The rest of the article is good but this is, of course, an error.
"If you don’t know what you have to fear, you will not survive."
I dunno ... I think deep down the muslims should be afraid of the European people. If one looks at who is capable of killing how many people for kicks I think the Euro's will win that prize(I use the term loosly) handily. Its not like they don't know how to round people up and do away with them.
To be expected of a European. (Though, of course, there are exceptions, and there are many American atheists, too).
I suppose that there may be some people who would dispute the basic argument, but I think that the question is really that we have not come to terms with the logical conclusion: What to do about it?
Put simply; if we cannot co-exist at some level of violence that is mutually acceptable, then one or the other must be destroyed absolutely and finally.
Therein lies the problem. Islam has taken that decision - centuries ago. The West has not, and probably cannot, because even the consideration of total and absolute annihilation of another culture violates the West's worldview. Which is why we have not already done it, and why we insist that our military "do more, with less". We have decided (whether we know it or not )that we will seek a mutually acceptable level of violence.
So be it. Plan accordingly.
I think you're correct. IMO, muslims in Euro have walked into a gun fight armed only with a dull knife. When the Europeans finally get fed up, it'll be a bloodbath.
..stupid is as stupid does
A brave warrior could have a cowardly child. A psycotic islamofascist could have a normal child.
Muslim countries do have a poor track record for fighting ability. It could stem from unwillingness to take orders and be organized rather than an issue of bravery or intelligence, though.
The onslaught of the euphemism "Alternative Lifestyle" is already finishing the breakup of the American family. More men and women life outside of wedlock than in it in America. With this moral relativism and relativism man to man, is it any surprise that we lose our freedoms because we simply wanted to consume it upon our pleasures and avoid moral absolutes.
She is right and more and more I see our culture accepting more and more deviancy more and more adultery and even the courts have begun legalized murder in the case of the helpless.
Unless our nation soon turns around, we, like the Romans, the ancient Egyptians will be a memory on a stone block and a wonderance of where we went wrong.
You are utterly correct... it's the same argument I had with some new acquaintenances from Australia this evening. They all agree that radical Islam and bombings (Bali anybody?) is a bad thing and will never go away on its own, but not wanting to draw any kind of line in the sand... what the f^ck kind of wussy stance is that?
Respectfully disagree. Of the opinion that no (physical) subdivisions of humanity have particular behavioral qualities based upon their genetic makeup (culture and tradition is another thing).
Well if people are raised a certain way long enough wont it play out in the genetic selection? I mean generals can raise pacifists sure but if you cultivate enough warriors long enough SOME traits must sink through... this is all conjecture I don't know any antrhopology or that much biological pysch...
BFLR.
Every time I read about Van Gogh's murder I say to myself 'he should have been armed'! Of course in The Netherlands that's not so easy.
I vote against such stupidity. It's better to go to war now than to await the disaster that will come.
Here's one :)
I work in public policy in DC and I seen her at a talk not long alfter she arrived here. She's very soft spoken (in contrast to her writing) but I can see all that controversy weighed heavily on her. She said she was just glad to live somewhere where she didn't have to look over her soldier all the time.
Sadly my FRiend, we are a small minority.
Neville Chamberline, I mean John Kerry will save the day.
/Sarc
Cheers,
knewshound
Humanism once was based on glorifying God. Hasn't been that way for a long time. I am sending this article out to everyone I know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.