1 posted on
11/28/2006 9:11:46 AM PST by
jmc1969
To: jmc1969
More Treason from the Treason Media. Will the US survive its press? Can it survive without jailing these editors who are working hand in glove with the enemy?
2 posted on
11/28/2006 9:14:14 AM PST by
justshutupandtakeit
(If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
To: jmc1969
I would suspect the number is actually higher as it probably does not accurately predict those who were wounded and later died.
3 posted on
11/28/2006 9:17:14 AM PST by
Michael.SF.
(Note: Sell Diebold Stock.................NOW!!)
To: jmc1969
ah but we're told how inneffectual the war on terror is and how it's nothign but a quagmire and how we must immediately retreat... eeeer I mean redeploy. The MSM says it so it must be true. http://sacredscoop.com
6 posted on
11/28/2006 9:27:54 AM PST by
CottShop
To: jmc1969
"US forces" can defaet anyone, anywhere, anytime. It's simply a matter of wanting to.
7 posted on
11/28/2006 9:31:55 AM PST by
wny
To: jmc1969
This report by AFP sounds very familiar. Hasn't this story been posted before, say, several weeks ago? I think the USMC report it refers to was leaked before the election. Yes?
8 posted on
11/28/2006 9:31:59 AM PST by
RexBeach
("There is no substitute for victory." Douglas MacArthur)
To: jmc1969
"The news comes hard on the heels of a leaked US Marine report that states US forces cannot defeat the Al-Qaeda-led insurgency in the vast western desert province of Al-Anbar."
It would have been irresponsible of AFP to post good news towards their readership, so they had to inluce this... They just HAVE to assure you over and over that they are traitors... NO wait! They are French after all!
9 posted on
11/28/2006 9:36:37 AM PST by
SolidWood
To: jmc1969
Aw, CNN weeps for it's fallen members!
10 posted on
11/28/2006 9:44:15 AM PST by
fishergirl
(Proud mom of an Iraq war veteran - to all our veterans Thank You and God Bless)
To: jmc1969
mostly women and children killed I am sure... /s
12 posted on
11/28/2006 9:59:46 AM PST by
dubie
To: jmc1969
Don't tell the liberals. They'll hvae heart attacks.
OTOH, then they won't show up to vote. :)
14 posted on
11/28/2006 10:19:26 AM PST by
TBP
To: jmc1969
Not enough dead vermin - add a few more zeroes after the 7000.
SS
To: jmc1969
Meanwhile the MSM ignores press releases like this:
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/NewsArticle.aspx?ID=2216
"Coalition Kills 26 Insurgents in Iraq, Aids Anbar Tribe
American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON, Nov. 26, 2006 Coalition forces conducted several operations yesterday that resulted in the deaths of 26 insurgents, and supported an Iraqi tribe under attack by al Qaeda today, military officials in Iraq announced."
Very telling of what outcome the MSM wants when they print a classified 'report' that they will never have to divulge in full but ignore the real news. The MSM and the left do not want victory for the US, but defeat and humiliation. For some reason, these same people think the danger to their lives from our enemies is not real.... I had to deal with one last Thursday. She is my wife's aunt and stated that I wouldn't be around to spend my promotion pay as I'll be dead in Iraq (deploying soon). She just laughed derisively when I told her about the real dangers withing the USA and what will happen if the West loses the War on Terror.
I have to wonder about the sanity and mental acuity of the leftists and others who think the dangers of islamofascism are just a made up fantasy....
24 posted on
11/28/2006 12:49:52 PM PST by
M1Tanker
(Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
To: jmc1969
AFP is SOOO much more pro-terrorists/radical-islam and Anti-America than even our own MSM...Agency Frog Press...cook-um!
25 posted on
11/28/2006 12:53:34 PM PST by
CaptSkip
To: jmc1969
Excellent. This does not include the local Sunni and Shia terrorists. Those were just Al Qaeda terrorist. Iraq was the burial of Al Qeadea, they wanted to fight us in Iraq and it is in Iraq where we have been annihilating them. Iraq is the center front of the war on terror.
PS: This needs to be in the Breaking News section. Please ask the moderator to move it there.
26 posted on
11/28/2006 1:18:44 PM PST by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: jmc1969; TomasUSMC
7000! That's all! As our own loses approach 3,000 KIA!
That is unbelievable or unforgivable -- which is it?
That is a kill rate and kill ratio that is unsustainable.
We've been FAR too restrained in our actions - and our warriors are paying the price.
Hell, with far less technology and a military filled with draftees who really didn't want to be there -- we killed a Million combatants in Vietnam.
In the war against these Islamofacists - we need to be killing them on the order of WWII -- by the 100s of thousands or millions.
Those in the forum who constantly repeat that Iraq is not Vietnam are correct -- we killed more of the enemy, and the war was NOT lost while we fought it.. The South Vietnamese lost the war, AFTER we left.
Semper Fi
28 posted on
11/28/2006 3:44:17 PM PST by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: jmc1969
Now the ultimate question is how many foreign fighters have been killed in Iraq since 2003?
40 posted on
11/29/2006 2:58:24 AM PST by
MinorityRepublican
(Everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson