Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain-Soros Toppled GOP Candidates
HUMAN EVENTS ^ | Nov 21, 2006 | Rabbi Aryeh Spero

Posted on 11/24/2006 5:53:57 PM PST by neverdem

"The Republicans lost because they were too conservative." "No, not conservative enough." "They lost because they disappointed the religious right." "No, because they are too tied to the religious right."

Many of us feel the loss was due to what I call "McCain-Soros."

Ever since the passage of McCain-Feingold, money has poured into organizations such as MoveOn.org, which in turn demonizes Republicans, painting a portrait of them as the incarnation of evil. The ads have had as their goal one thing: leaving a sour taste in the mouth of the electorate over anything Republican, conservative or religious. It has worked. The soft Republican, such as Sen. Lincoln Chaffee, went down with the tough Republican, such as Sen. Rick Santorum.

These ads, paid for by George Soros, Peter Lewis and other multi-millionaire leftists are the direct result of, and have been made possible by, the passage of McCain-Feingold, which opened the door to unlimited spending by left-wing fat cats on behalf of liberal candidates and causes. Until its passage, contributions were, basically, limited to the political parties and candidates themselves, but with a cap. Until the passage of McCain-Feingold, a cap was placed on how much Soros could underwrite in his lust for power and influence.

Sen. John McCain (R.-Ariz.) has made it possible for George Soros and other billionaire transnationalists to effect and determine the outcome of our elections and thus U.S. destiny, indeed world destiny. And that is exactly what the wealthy internationalists have always craved.

Certainly, McCain was aware that if the most liberal member of the Senate, Russ Feingold (D.-Wis.), was pushing a piece of legislation, its purpose was not to help conservative causes but the far left ones that are Feingold's life's mission. Indeed, Feingold had a hard time finding a sponsor across the aisle willing to proffer the "bipartisan" aura he needed to gain passage for this liberal dream.

Feingold understood, as we now all do, the Achilles’ heel of John McCain. To wit: I am the "cleaner" and wiser Republican. I stand out from the pack. "Take the dirty money out of politics" became McCain's slogan. He did, and now we have the "clean" money of George Soros and Peter Lewis, so clean that it can be spread around, infinitely, for every left-wing cause. It was noble, a campaign finance "reform," so befitting of Mr. Noble.

President Bush did not veto it. We didn't fight it, assured that it would be overturned by the courts as "limiting free speech." But, it wasn't overturned. Everyone passed the buck hoping that the next link in the process would stop it.

Democrats since Bill Clinton do one thing: they campaign every day as if it is the day preceding an election. They demonize Republicans, our motives. The message they telegraph is not so much about our policy but our "sinister" goals. It is Halliburton, profiteering from war, mean-spiritedness, dogmatism over compassion. It is 24/7/365.

The purpose of the ads is not to illuminate their political positions. It is to destroy the Republican candidate and officeholder, the persona of the conservative. Through osmosis -- after a five year daily barrage of ads on radio, TV and in newspapers -- it appears to have worked.

Republicans, on the other hand, don't begin serious campaigning until the month before the election and have never learned the Goebbles technique so familiar, and comfortable, to Democrats: demonize the person, demonize the group. Do so every day, until respectable people find it offensive to be associated with, let alone vote for, such terrible people. The Muslims are doing it against Israel, against Jews, and they are indeed swaying Europe, prevailing.

The paid-for-by-Soros ads contributed mightily to the Republican defeat. Having won the House and Senate, Democrats can save some money by no longer having to pay for as many ads since they will use their committee positions to demonize and destroy conservatives through Democrat witch hunts under chairmen who have a Torquemada/Inquisition-like intent toward those they are "investigating." Instead of paid ads, the mainstream media will for free, as news, nightly furnish Americans the audios and visuals from the congressional hearings -- the images -- that will make anyone associated with the Republican party look like a thief, greedy, a conspirator -- Al Capone.

Companies that contributed too much to Republican candidates will be hauled in and scrutinized under a series of bogus charges. The public will love it, for the Democrats and 527s have spent the last few years laying the demonization groundwork regarding companies such as Exxon, Phillip Morris, Merck, Diebold, Halliburton, Wal-Mart: big oil, big tobacco, big pharmaceutical, giant retailers, etc. If "smart," these companies will mend their ways and learn their lesson regarding who should be the major beneficiary of their contributions. After all, inquisitors simply want and always accept repentance.

So thank you, John McCain, for your tireless efforts in behalf of McCain-Soros, clean money and motives and "reform." You have helped bring your party down. Thanks for being the gang leader of the “Gang of 14,” which stood in the way of up-or-down confirmation of conservative justices. Hats off to you for redefining torture so that effective interrogation of jihadists is forever impossible. As a reward, you wish, now, to lead the party and become its Presidential nominee and standard bearer. I don't think so.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: cfr; feingold; fredthompson; mccain; mccainfeingold; mccainsoros; mccaintruthfile; nowaymccain; rmsp; soros; spero; traitorjohn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: nwrep
Wow, really? I wish there were more Democrats like him.

Yeah, me too. I also wish every one of them had a (D) after their name like McCain should.
21 posted on 11/24/2006 7:04:53 PM PST by Tailback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Feingold understood, as we now all do, the Achilles’ heel of John McCain.

And the final act in the Dems strategy is to help McCain get the nomination...a certain defeat for Republicans...or, if he doesn't, to be positioned for a third party run, to insure the same result. Remember the MSM has already annointed him as "Maverick".

Is there anyone here wo still doesn't get this? Please report in immediately for your un-kool aid treatment.

22 posted on 11/24/2006 7:05:10 PM PST by NewLand (Always Remember September 11, 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGreek
Oh yes the Republicans were outspent. How does one put a price tag on allll the lovely liberal stories and the continuous non-stop smear of evil against Republican by MSM news stories?

That was the purpose of McCain/Feingold to legally authorize the MSM power over elections, especially 60 days prior to an election. All Republicans got out of that transition of power was the 'right' to say I am 'so and so' and I approve this message.
23 posted on 11/24/2006 7:10:39 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

McCain was universally reviled by all involved in activities at local party HQ's leading up to the disasterous 2006 vote. McCain's grass roots have withered and died from the tender mercies McCain-Feingold had on those who follow the rules.


24 posted on 11/24/2006 8:09:22 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Prayers for our patriot brother, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub. Brian, we're all pulling for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks we needed this summary.

McCain-Feingold allowed this and disallowed individuals like you and me from commenting before elections - even if we pay for the advertising ourselves.

We lost our First Amendment rights with this bill.

I will never vote for John McCain.


25 posted on 11/24/2006 8:16:12 PM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The Real McCain

SEN. JOHN McCAIN: THE ULTIMATE "RHINESTONE HERO"

SEN. JOHN McCAIN: THE ULTIMATE "RHINESTONE HERO" Part II

John McCain Gets Soros Cash

John McCain Is No Hero

U.S. Sen. John McCain is no War Hero

John McCain: The Manchurian Candidate

JOHN MCCAIN, WARTS AND ALL

John McCain, you treasonous bastard, I challenge you or any of your traitorous cohorts...

McCain Is Booed by Labor Activists

McCain Rides to Kerry's Rescue: "John Kerry is Not Weak on Defense" (Today Show alert)

John McCain SCREAMS AT 9/11 FSA MEMBERS FOR OPPOSING HIS BILL TO GIVE AMNESTY FOR ILLEGALS

John McCain's Skeleton Closet

A number of articles on McCain. (some the same as above)

McCain/Soros by Rabbi Areyh Spero

26 posted on 11/24/2006 8:16:18 PM PST by TigersEye (Ego chatters endlessly on. Mind speaks in great silence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Republicans lost,

war in Iraq,
price gouging at the gas pump.

Do Republicans in newly competitive districts have brains?
-->
wake up, ya stupid f^^^s


27 posted on 11/24/2006 8:30:59 PM PST by greasepaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

WOW. This guy gets it.


28 posted on 11/24/2006 8:31:35 PM PST by Marysecretary (Thank you, Lord, for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

Yes, they did do a lousy job but the media sure as .... didn't help. They gave demonrats a pass every time but the pubbies were practically crucified.


29 posted on 11/24/2006 8:33:32 PM PST by Marysecretary (Thank you, Lord, for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Klinx

McCain believes his biggest liability is his role in the Lincoln National S&L bribery scandal so he blows smoke with "reform" which gives the MSM more power and they love him for it.


30 posted on 11/24/2006 8:53:43 PM PST by Kenny500c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The rabbi has a good point here. McStain is to blame for squandering much of our advantage in TV ads and radio.


31 posted on 11/24/2006 8:54:37 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

McCain-Soros-BUSH funded the Dems. I add Bush's name because he let the McCain bill become law (he actually signed it, didn't he?) That makes it his bill as much as McCain's bill.


32 posted on 11/24/2006 8:55:34 PM PST by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"George Soros, Peter Lewis and other multi-millionaire leftists"
Hmm, and what happened to the multi-billionaire rightists? Have they all, without exception, "betrayed their class"?
33 posted on 11/24/2006 8:55:38 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
That Republicans
had nothing to do with their losses.
34 posted on 11/24/2006 9:02:49 PM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewLand

Ironically, it has been the Dem operatives who have been pushing McCain as THE Republican candidate for the past year.


35 posted on 11/24/2006 9:04:32 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
McCain-Feingold is an unConstitutional piece of trash.

Having said that. Who signed McCain-Feingold into law? Why President Bush, of course.

When things go wrong, you must first look inward. You must ask, "What did we do wrong? What could we have done better? What mistakes did we make?" It would be foolish at this stage to start assigning blame either to the media or to liberals or Democrats or the voters or the American people. I'm not going to fall into the trap that the liberals and Democrats fall into every time they lose an election and start blaming everybody else. Republicans lost last night but conservatism did not, and that is, to me, one of the fundamental elements of last night's results. Conservatism did not lose; Republicans lost last night.

--- Rush Limbaugh, November 8, 2006

36 posted on 11/24/2006 9:13:53 PM PST by Reagan Man (Conservatives don't support amnesty and conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

BTTT read later


37 posted on 11/24/2006 11:03:51 PM PST by Phyto Chems (Protect the border, NOW the goverment needs to one thing FIRST - CLOSE the Border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Thanks so much for the post.

So thank you, John McCain, for your tireless efforts in behalf of McCain-Soros, clean money and motives and "reform." You have helped bring your party down. Thanks for being the gang leader of the “Gang of 14,” which stood in the way of up-or-down confirmation of conservative justices. Hats off to you for redefining torture so that effective interrogation of jihadists is forever impossible. As a reward, you wish, now, to lead the party and become its Presidential nominee and standard bearer. I don't think so.

That sure says it all for me, he has been attempting to move RIGHT since the election. I will never vote for this RINO, I hope the rest of the GOP is not fooled. I think the lame-stream media wants him elected.

38 posted on 11/24/2006 11:30:17 PM PST by Phyto Chems (Protect the border, NOW the government needs to one thing FIRST - CLOSE the Border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

McCain is a megalomaniac and a lunatic.

But PRESIDENT BUSH SIGNED THE LEGISLATION!

.


39 posted on 11/25/2006 4:12:41 AM PST by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Oh yes the Republicans were outspent. How does one put a price tag on allll the lovely liberal stories and the continuous non-stop smear of evil against Republican by MSM news stories

Are you suggesting that Reagan, Bush 1 and 2 did have the same press?
In 1984 the MSM was all about Reagan drooling.
The press doesn't matter if the candidate has the correct positions and shows strength.
The MSM uses the candidate's weaknesses to defeat them.


40 posted on 11/25/2006 6:27:06 AM PST by ConservativeGreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson