Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Human genome more variable than previously thought
news@nature.com ^ | 22 November 2006 | Helen Pearson

Posted on 11/24/2006 9:48:22 AM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Global variation in copy number in the human genome Nature's article will have an impact.

Genetic breakthrough that reveals the differences between humans

1 posted on 11/24/2006 9:48:26 AM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: neverdem

"Geneticists have generally assumed".



Assumptions are often misleading.


3 posted on 11/24/2006 9:53:51 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Geneticists have generally assumed...................



says it all.


4 posted on 11/24/2006 9:54:50 AM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Geneticists have generally assumed that your string of DNA 'letters' is 99.9% identical to that of your neighbour's, with differences in the odd individual letter

Viva le differance.

5 posted on 11/24/2006 10:46:46 AM PST by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
Been posted a couple of times already. :-)

Not this article from news@nature. Since it blows Mendelian genetics out of the water, it can't be posted enough. Did any link the actual article from Nature, i.e. the first link in comment# 1?

6 posted on 11/24/2006 10:54:16 AM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

"Since it blows Mendelian genetics out of the water..."

Can you please explain what this means? I have been tutoring a student in science and her course includes a section on DNA and how characteristics are passed to offspring. I find the topic very interesting but I don't fully understand this myself so perhaps you could help me out a bit.


7 posted on 11/24/2006 11:59:17 AM PST by Albertafriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Atheists sure push DNA, homosexuality and evilution all from assumptions.
8 posted on 11/24/2006 12:04:55 PM PST by mountainlyons (Hard core conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Albertafriend
Can you please explain what this means?

Can I explain what I took as a course for a semester in college decades ago? I don't think so. It explained inherited characteristics such as blue eyes or red hair by getting a copy of a recessive gene from each parent. It's a complicated subject. Perform a search on the term Mendelian Genetics. Here's one link that seems OK. Mendel's First Law of Genetics

9 posted on 11/24/2006 12:20:30 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mountainlyons
Atheists sure push DNA, homosexuality and evilution all from assumptions.

Tell that to Dr. Francis Collins, head of the Human Genome Project, and the author of "The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief."

10 posted on 11/24/2006 12:29:40 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I like Dr. Hugh Ross and his Reasons to believe website. There are many sides to the evidence from research but I find the left the most stubborn. It really bothers me to talk to someone that has an argument for something and will not even acknowledge any merit the others. I find the DNA studies interesting but some of the conclusions are really out there.
11 posted on 11/24/2006 1:16:00 PM PST by mountainlyons (Hard core conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It does NOT blow Mendelian Genetics out of the water.
It just means there is more variability than thought before.
Besides a lot of the "Human Genome Sequence" was taken from a group of people in Buffalo , NY.
DNA samples were taken from a group of people and pooled. This was then used in one of the two methods used to sequence the genome. The scientist who collected the DNA worked at Roswell Park Memorial Institute in Buffalo. The DNA was pooled, so no one race or ethnic group's traits were considered as the "standard".


12 posted on 11/24/2006 3:43:04 PM PST by Wacka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wacka
It just means there is more variability than thought before.

That's quite an understatement.

13 posted on 11/24/2006 5:15:09 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Doesn't surprise me. After all, we are "fearfully, wonderfully made".


14 posted on 11/24/2006 7:39:19 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
Red Wine Ingredient Increases Endurance, Study Shows

Midwest town sees return of old disease

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

Your posting privilege has been suspended until 2006-11-23 01:48:11

Reason:
3 days off for copyright violation.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1741331/posts

This thread has been pulled.

Pulled on 11/19/2006 8:46:07 PM EST by Admin Moderator, reason:

No link.

Don't forget the URL, or you can get suspended.

15 posted on 11/24/2006 10:33:21 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; All

Fascinating. Thanks the post/links. Thanks to all contributors.


16 posted on 11/24/2006 10:50:16 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Already went through posting opinions on this, here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1743024/posts . Interestingly, this thread seems more in line and conducive with point, than the other one.
17 posted on 11/25/2006 6:54:47 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( For the Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mountainlyons

Agree that people should be respectful, and at least listen and know what other people believe in terms of origins, and the scientific evidence used to back it up. Disagree with Mr. Ross, though.


18 posted on 11/25/2006 6:56:42 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( For the Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I guess all that scientists are admitting that they really know only a very small part of all that there is to know.


19 posted on 11/25/2006 7:00:38 AM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

Thanks for the link.


20 posted on 11/25/2006 2:27:12 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson