Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

37 percent of U.S. births out of wedlock
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061121/ap_on_re_us/unmarried_births ^ | 3 minutes ago | MIKE STOBBE, AP Medical Writer

Posted on 11/21/2006 1:23:56 PM PST by BenLurkin

ATLANTA - Out-of-wedlock births in the United States have climbed to an all-time high, accounting for nearly four in 10 babies born last year, government health officials said Tuesday.

While out-of-wedlock births have long been associated with teen mothers, the teen birth rate actually dropped last year to the lowest level on record. Instead, births among unwed mothers rose most dramatically among women in their 20s.

The overall rise reflects the burgeoning number of people who are putting off marriage or living together without getting married.

The increase in births to unwed mothers was seen in all racial groups, but rose most sharply among Hispanics. It was up among all age groups except youngsters ages 10 to 17.

"A lot of people think of teenagers and unmarried mothers synonymously, but they are not driving this," said Stephanie Ventura of the National Center for Health Statistics, a co-author of the report.

The government also reported that the rate of births by Caesarean delivery continued to climb in 2005 to a record high, despite efforts by public health authorities to bring down the number.

Many experts believe a large number of C-sections are medically unnecessary and done only for the convenience of the mother or her doctor.

The government report includes information from 99 percent of U.S. birth certificates filed last year. The information for 2005 is considered preliminary, but officials said it is not expected to change much.

About 4.1 million babies were born in the United States last year, up slightly from 2004. More than 1.5 million of those were to unmarried women; that is about 37 percent of the total. In 2004, about 36 percent of births were out of wedlock.

Out-of-wedlock births have been rising since the late 1990s.

But just because a mother is not married does not mean the father isn't around, Ventura noted. She noted 2002 statistics that showed that about 20 percent of all new mothers under 20 were unmarried but living with the father at the time of the birth. That same was true of about 13 percent of all new mothers ages 20 to 24.

According to census figures, the median age at first marriage was 27 for men and 25 for women last year, up from 23 and 20 in 1950. Meanwhile, the number of unmarried-couple households with children has been climbing, hitting more than 1.7 million last year, up from under 200,000 in 1970.

Other findings in the report:

The birth rate among teenagers declined 2 percent in 2005, continuing a trend from the early 1990s. The rate is now about 40 births per 1,000 females ages 15 to 19. That is the lowest level in the 65 years for which a consistent series of rates is available.

The U.S. teen birth rate is still the highest among industrialized countries.

Births to women in their early 20s rose slightly, to 102 births per 1,000 women ages 20 to 24. Births to women in their late 20s — the most productive group in terms of childbirth — was about that same from the previous year, at about 116 per 1,000 women ages 25 to 29.

The C-section rate rose to 30.2 percent of all births in 2005, an increase of 1 percentage point from the previous year. The rate has risen by nearly half since 1996.

"It is clear that the procedure is being overused," Tonya Jamois, president of the International Cesarean Awareness Network, said in a statement. ICAN is a California-based nonprofit organization focused on lowering C-section rates.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: birthrates; immigration; moralabsolutes; population; squishy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last
To: BenLurkin

Geez, I wonder why we have these income disparities the Dims are talking about and claim they will be addressing as part of their 100 day agenda??


41 posted on 11/21/2006 2:01:15 PM PST by MikeA (Where's the media to call the elections a "temper tantrum" by America like they did in 1994?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Thirty-seven per cent?! OMG! A sound and healthy society cannot support that statistic. But a society that lives by Hollywood standards can... as long as it never has to face up to hardship and difficult times, and as long as it never has to truly fend for itself in a very tough world.


42 posted on 11/21/2006 2:02:29 PM PST by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death

I believe that would be "Welfare Senoritas!


43 posted on 11/21/2006 2:03:05 PM PST by Recon Dad (Marine Spec Ops Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

This is the subsidization of Vicious Bastards. These are disasters for society.


44 posted on 11/21/2006 2:07:33 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

"Yes, that would be racist.

Also pointless and irrelevant."

Pointless and irrelevant is in the eye of the beholder. But, if you think that it would be racist, perhaps you need a dictionary for Christmas. It's not even remotely racist to publish accurate statistics about anything.


45 posted on 11/21/2006 2:09:20 PM PST by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Surely you are not so deluded as to believe society is going to accept hospitals allowing people to die in their parking lots or lobbies.

Given the fact that women make up over half the population THAT ain't going to happen.


46 posted on 11/21/2006 2:10:01 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

"I do think ending automatic citizenship for babies (anchor babies) could be a solution."

NOW there is zero chance of any such solution since the GOP is being "punished". Funny how it looks as though rationality is being punished.


47 posted on 11/21/2006 2:12:32 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Those who like to see the stats broken down by race do so because they get a perverse kick out of showing that blacks and Mexicans have higher rates of unwed mothers.
Then they can infer without saying so that white females are somehow more virtuous than those"other women because they are more "responsible and moral" which is nonsense to anyone who has spent any time with the current crop of women of ANY ethnicity whose morals are dictated by MTV and the whole Sex and the City ethic.


48 posted on 11/21/2006 2:16:46 PM PST by Riverman94610
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
But just because a mother is not married does not mean the father isn't around, Ventura noted. She noted 2002 statistics that showed that about 20 percent of all new mothers under 20 were unmarried but living with the father at the time of the birth. That same was true of about 13 percent of all new mothers ages 20 to 24.

Typical and planned. The father works. The mother gets welfare. This way they can afford the custom paint job on their low rider car and all the tequila dad wants, while Taxpayers pick up the bill for rent and food and medical on his family.

It's called "Welfare Scam".

49 posted on 11/21/2006 2:17:40 PM PST by Last Laugh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

Yes, elitist/progressive Norman Lear used the lyrics of that song as a sneer against traditional values.

By the end of it's run, when the American public was beginning to see the damage caused by liberal idiocy, I believe more people were laughing WITH All in the Family's Archie Bunker, than AT him.


50 posted on 11/21/2006 2:22:33 PM PST by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death

Can you say Anchor babies....
Can you say Illegal Immigrants....

If you can you are better than the MSM....


51 posted on 11/21/2006 2:23:31 PM PST by Youngman442002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Really bad news. It's gone up since the last figures I saw. The UK is at about 50% illegitimate.

This signals the end of civilization if not corrected. Children raised without fathers married to their mothers have a bad, bad track record.


52 posted on 11/21/2006 2:29:34 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Actually, not pointless and irrelevant, because the last figures I saw stated that among blacks, the figures for illegitimate births were around 75-80%. If that doesn't scare people, I don't know what will.

The black family has been almost destroyed by welfare. And a few other things. But when there are few intact families, things go to he!! in a handbasket very quickly.


53 posted on 11/21/2006 2:32:28 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
Look to your left. Look to your right.

If they're not bastards, then you are.

< }B^)

54 posted on 11/21/2006 2:34:02 PM PST by Erasmus (I finally figured out that my life has a purpose--as a cautionary example to others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
No, that would be informative. In fact, because they didn't break it down by race except to note an increase in illegitimate hispanic births is racist by design in that it deliberately fails to completely inform the reader what group is driving this shift. Obviously, we have a problem in black America and that is where the greatest problem lies. Black America is looking at nearly 75% illegitimacy and that is a problem for us all that will only get worse if we avoid the facts and play some phony PC game where we ignore the monstrous disorder in American under classes.
55 posted on 11/21/2006 2:42:14 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (Ever learning . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cobaltblu
Welfare and abortion...

Welfare Queens don't believe in abortion.

56 posted on 11/21/2006 2:43:20 PM PST by AmusedBystander (Republicans - doing the work that Democrats won't do since 1854.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"The increase in births to unwed mothers was seen in all racial groups, but rose most sharply among Hispanics. It was up among all age groups except youngsters ages 10 to 17. "

Wow, who'd a thunk it? /sarc
57 posted on 11/21/2006 2:47:36 PM PST by stm (It's time to take our country back from the surrender monkeys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stm

Daniel Patrick Monyihan warned that this day would come. He pointed out that AFDC would lead to the disintegration of Families and more single Moms. We are subsidizing the worst behavior in our Society and creating future Criminals. How stupid and insane is this? More members of the permanent dependency class. Suckling at the Government Teat. When are we going to demand an end to the Gravy Train for bringing illegitmate Children into our Society??!

With removal of Millions of Fathers, the collapse of the Family we have the highest per Capita Criminal populace on the Planet. This is the fruits of Big Government and Feminism.


58 posted on 11/21/2006 3:06:25 PM PST by Khankrumthebulgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

"Claim: A recent patient survey indicated that 70% of the women who gave birth at Parkland Hospital in Dallas, Texas in the first three months of 2006 were illegal immigrants.

Status: True. "

Solution: Unilaterally declare the hospital Mexican territory, a medical embassy. Transfer all illegal alien patients there.

Mrs VS


59 posted on 11/21/2006 3:08:00 PM PST by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Why does anybody care if babies are born "out of wedlock" or "in wedlock"? The important thing is, are they born to someone who is prepared to raise them at her/their own expense, or are the taxpayers going to get hit with the bill? If I'm getting the bill for raising your kids, it doesn't make me any less pissed if you have a little piece of paper fromt he government saying you're "married". Irresponsible is irresponsible, and bringing children into the world when you clearly have no way to support them financially and/or personally, is irresponsible.


60 posted on 11/21/2006 3:12:53 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson