Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christians kicked off campus at Brown University
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | November 18, 2006

Posted on 11/18/2006 4:36:21 AM PST by Man50D

A civil rights organization has joined forces with a Christian student group at Brown University in an attempt to find out why the school has banned the Christians from meeting on its campus.

"A university that respects its students cannot capriciously suspend student groups," said Greg Lukianoff, the president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. "Suspension of any student group is a serious matter and should be accompanied by a serious explanation. Yet Brown has consistently skirted questions about the suspension, calling into question both the university's motives and the legitimacy of the punishment."

FIRE said the members of the Trinity Presbyterian Church campus fellowship had sought from school officials an explanation for the punishment. After being offered varying and shifting reasons, they sought help from FIRE in trying to obtain the information.

As WND as reported, the move by Brown comes just weeks after Georgetown University notified a group of evangelical Christian organizations, such as InterVarsity Christian Fellowship, they would no longer be allowed to operate on campus. The university said it was going in another "direction" but never explained more fully.

The Alliance Defense Fund wrote a letter to Georgetown asking for reconsideration of its ban on several Christian groups. Officials said no response was received.

Those in a position to know have reported that the Christian groups were booted from campus for being too evangelical, because student clubs promoting Muslim and Jewish beliefs were allowed to continue existing within the formal campus structure.

Now comes the move by Brown to eject the meetings involving nearly 100 students, and the varying explanations the school has offered, according to FIRE.

The first apparent word of trouble was in September when Janet Cooper Nelson, of the school's Office of the Chaplains and Religious Life, sent the fellowship's leaders an e-mail explaining it was suspended because of "non-compliance with University policy and procedure."

She alleged Trinity Presbyterian Church, the sponsoring body, "has withdrawn its sponsorship."

The difficulty there was that Trinity Senior Pastor David Sherwood immediately responded that the church "has not, in any sense, withdrawn its sponsorship." In fact, he said, the group's leaders and students "do a fantastic job of equipping the rising generation of student leaders."

Then Allen Callahan, an associate chaplain at the school, explained that a form that was submitted late meant that the group "had not been a 'recognized student organization' since the fall of last year."

However, officials also noted there was no suspension in place at that time, and in fact the group retained the right to reserve meeting space throughout the school year.

Callahan then offered the accusation that the group "had become possessed of a leadership culture of contempt and dishonesty that has rendered all collegial relations with my office impossible."

So the students asked for an explanation of the "culture of contempt and dishonesty" but did not get a response.

On the FIRE website, Tara Sweeney wrote that student groups "should not exist at the mercy of administrative caprice… Brown University encourages its students to forge their own path, famously telling them that at Brown, 'you will be challenged to define liberal education for yourself.' But students whose definition includes membership in this evangelical Christian fellowship are just out of luck."

When FIRE got involved, the civil rights group got a statement from Russell Carey, an interim vice president of campus life, that he would personally "mediate" the issues, "with the goal of ending the suspension.:

"Over the years FIRE has seen too many examples of administrators treating religious groups in an unjust manner. All students – religious and otherwise – deserve fair treatment," said Samantha Harris, the organization's director of legal and public advocacy.

"We hope that Brown will take seriously its promise to revisit the suspension and reach a decision that shows respect for students of faith."

"It's the students who lose out in this situation," said Pastor Sherwood. "It's hard to imagine that anyone's involvement in this organization could be anything but beneficial."

A number of other universities also have taken action to dismiss various Christian organizations, and have faced legal action because of their decisions. Most of those cases have had to do with the Christian organizations failing to follow school "diversity" plans because they require their leaders to be Christian.

FIRE is a nonprofit education foundation. It works with civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists and others on behalf of individual rights, due process, freedom of expression and academic freedom at colleges and universities across the country.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ac; academia; christianity; christophobia; discrimination; islam; misotheism; persecution; theophobia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: Labyrinthos
.......Georgetown's position as a Roman Catholic college that is run by the Jesuit order.

Are you aware that Georgetown, the RC college run by Jesuits has recently accepted a very large donation from a Saudi prince? Are you aware that it was shortly after the donation that Georgetown began their purging of Christian groups? How long do you think it will be before Georgetown begins purging Catholic groups as well?

I guess I'll ignore all postings from you about religion in future, since you evidently think that everybody who does not accept the supremacy of the Pope is a nut job.

Any Christian who applauds the persecution of any other Christian qualifies as a jut job in my book.

41 posted on 11/18/2006 6:22:45 AM PST by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
I guess I'll ignore all postings from you about religion in future, since you evidently think that everybody who does not accept the supremacy of the Pope is a nut job.

Not quite. I think that anyone who believes that Catholics are not Christians is a nut job. Are you?

42 posted on 11/18/2006 6:32:46 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Why not just ban all religious groups from campus?
43 posted on 11/18/2006 6:36:49 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Most of those cases have had to do with the Christian organizations failing to follow school "diversity" plans because they require their leaders to be Christian.

So, satanists, muslims, Jews, etc. are all griping because they aren't allowed to be leaders of a Christian organization? Somehow, that part of the school's "plan" doesn't make sense.

44 posted on 11/18/2006 6:37:16 AM PST by scan58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth

And the Freedom of Religion was a particular hallmark of Rhode Island, the first state to recognize that right. What would Roger Williams say?


45 posted on 11/18/2006 6:45:31 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Prayers for our patriot brother, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub. Brian, we're all pulling for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

I grew up disliking the fact that fundmentalists told me, I couldn't or shouldn't drink, smoke, dance or kiss girls. Now the leftist tell me I can't drink, smoke or kiss girls (boys okay) and will get around to dancing sooner rather than later. I guess that it why the leftists don't complain about muslims, because they are against smoking, drinking, drinking and kissing girls too.


46 posted on 11/18/2006 6:50:57 AM PST by razorback-bert (I met Bill Clinton once but he didn?t really talk ? he was hitting on my wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
Interesting icon in the address bar of that url. A crusader shield.

I don't get it. What do you mean? (I mean computer-wise.)

47 posted on 11/18/2006 7:00:57 AM PST by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Sometimes I think the way so-called 'liberals' treat Christians is not that far removed from the way the old Romans treated Christians, except today, lions are in short supply.


48 posted on 11/18/2006 7:02:56 AM PST by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

One would think attending an Ivy League school would be punishment enough.


49 posted on 11/18/2006 7:16:05 AM PST by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Nothing surprises me anymore.


50 posted on 11/18/2006 7:18:33 AM PST by YourAdHere (Democrats still stink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
I'm a member of Intervarsity Christian Fellowship at my school. If they try to ban the club there, they're going to be in for a major fight.
51 posted on 11/18/2006 7:19:07 AM PST by Chewie84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

A friend of mine has a son who just started his freshman year in college. For his Poly Sci class, he wrote a report on illegal immigration. The professor gave the report back to him, and in every use of the phrase "illegal immigrant," the professor had scratched it out and written "guest worker."


52 posted on 11/18/2006 7:20:55 AM PST by YourAdHere (Democrats still stink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
We need to find ways to use our courts to prove that Islam is unconstitutional.

I have to ask, how is Islam unconstitutional? Do you mean the practice of Islam? If so, please explain.
53 posted on 11/18/2006 7:29:36 AM PST by jonesboheim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

I don't know if your browser picks it up, but in the address bar of the page, there is a little square graphic (icon). FR has one too. Red and blue with a star.


54 posted on 11/18/2006 7:29:37 AM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
"Any Christian who applauds the persecution of any other Christian qualifies as a jut job in my book."

Where the heck did this come from?

55 posted on 11/18/2006 7:32:10 AM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

Ironically, in almost all instances where that phrase was used back then, it meant freedom to worship the Christian God as one chose and not being forced to follow one denomination.


56 posted on 11/18/2006 7:35:32 AM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jonesboheim

I'm sorry I didn't see your question earlier and I don't have much time right now. But I will give you this for starters. Islam is a complete system with its own laws - in other words, it is a state. Our Constitution specifically forbids a state within a state. Islamic law is incompatible with our Constitution.


57 posted on 11/18/2006 7:46:56 AM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

Easily done, but they would say the Constitution is
for infidels...and there you have the conflict in a
nutshell.....


58 posted on 11/18/2006 7:54:33 AM PST by Getready (Truth and wisdom are more elusive, and valuable, than gold and diamonds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jonesboheim

By the way, if you have some free time, you might want to google a bit and read what Jefferson and Adams had to say about Islam. Islam represents everything Jefferson was against.


59 posted on 11/18/2006 7:55:28 AM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Getready

That it is and we are still in charge (mostly).


60 posted on 11/18/2006 7:56:42 AM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson