Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: radiohead
Re post 17 you asked "who would we attack?" I think a better question is "what would we attack?" A nuclear attack on the CONUS would consititute an all out war with (radical) islam. Don't be surprised to see internment camps in the US, just like WW II. The Persian Gulf supply route and the oil fields of Saudi Arabia and Iran should be secured, occupied and pumped out. The NWP of Pakistan should be attacked from the air with nuclear weapons if neccessary.

Before the US is attacked, a nuclear target list should be drawn up and shown to moslem leaders. It should be made very clear that these targets will be vaporized within 24 hours of a nuclear attack against the US. This target list would include all the major urban areas and all the religious sites of the islamic world, including Mecca, Medina et al.

War is war, sides must be chosen and if you choose the wrong side, you might lose your life.

37 posted on 11/14/2006 5:15:03 AM PST by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name after Harper's election?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Former Proud Canadian

Sadly, I think your plan might be the only one that works.

The founding commander of the Air Force's Strategic Air Command, Curtis LeMay, was asked in 1986 if the U.S. could have won in Vietnam. He replied, "In any two week period you care to mention." Of course, his plan was for massive strategic bombing, and it would have worked...we know that from information that's come out since the war regarding how the North Vietnamese viewed the Linebacker campaigns.

Mybe I'm biased because I cut my teeth in SAC, but we may just have to channel Curtis LeMay to win this thing. I'm not one of the "nuke 'em all" crowd, I just think it's time to get the non-terrorists and terrorist funders worried about what the terrorists might get them into.


42 posted on 11/14/2006 5:55:04 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (Welcome swingers! Pull up a groove and get fabulous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Former Proud Canadian

That sounds great, but can you see the dems doing that if they're the ones in power?


46 posted on 11/14/2006 6:02:23 AM PST by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Your scenario is chilling and spot on. The mohammedan cultists would be targets of violence and their cult centers razed. The mohammedans would demand to be protected and the only way to do that would be to put them in protective camps. If any cult leaders survive the initial violence they should be held in a separate protective camp far away from their factions fervent followers.

Yes, the cube would have to be vaporized. War, as you say, is war.


55 posted on 11/14/2006 7:30:04 AM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Interesting. Absent a state to pursue, pursuing and destroying select targets (let's start w/Mecca) in various countries makes sense.


62 posted on 11/14/2006 9:28:35 AM PST by radiohead (Hey Kerry, I'm still here; still hating your lying, stinking, guts you coward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson