Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

How differently things would have been if Frist had used the nuclear/Constitutional option last year.
1 posted on 11/13/2006 4:26:17 PM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: wagglebee
Sen. Charles Schumer, of New York, was more strident .... "We will do everything in our power to see that that unfettered abortion happens," he told Newsday, saying filibusters should be expected. He added that Bush "will have to negotiate with us perform an abortion himself, because we'll have the majority."

There ... fixed Schmuckies statement .....

88 posted on 11/13/2006 4:59:58 PM PST by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Guess this is another one of those lessons we are suppose to learn, huh?


89 posted on 11/13/2006 5:00:19 PM PST by Mo1 (Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

W just doesn't have the balls to tell them that he will veto everything they pass. If he truly understood what Democrats are (i.e., the American equivalent of Islamic Terrorists) he WOULD get the balls and veto everything...


93 posted on 11/13/2006 5:02:56 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

To Senator McCain and the other Republicans who cut the "Gang of 14" deal: meet your legacy. Your compromise has made it terribly difficult, well nigh impossible, to pass conservative judges.

If you and your fellow Senators had allowed the "Constitutional" option, we would get a straight up or down vote and most likely win, because several Southern Democrats would have gone along.


95 posted on 11/13/2006 5:03:47 PM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

True. But that would have required a set on the Hill and at 1600.


100 posted on 11/13/2006 5:08:05 PM PST by alarm rider (Not a democrat, not a republican, not a "libertarian".. A CONSERVATIVE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Well if Bush is asked he should say he rejects any notion of litmus tests. he should fight this battle on his own terms and not allow them to dictate litmus tests. What did Clinton do about Republicans even thinking about applying litmust tests to his judicial nominees?


102 posted on 11/13/2006 5:09:32 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Bush can nominate who he pleases. Then we can watch the dimocrats continue to be obstructionists!


103 posted on 11/13/2006 5:09:46 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I find it hard to believe anyone with a sane brain would run under the Party of Abortion and expect to get elected. Apparently it happens. The blue dog and moderate dems ought to call the crazy left on this, tell them to kiss grits, and work toward nominating federal judges who are originalist. No matter where we stand in the way of fiscal policy it makes sense to protect the unborn until we are certain both morally and scientifically they are not worthy of protection. Even then it still makes sense. More lives = more productivity and more taxpayers. :)


105 posted on 11/13/2006 5:16:16 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
This is the result of losing power in Congress. And of course the Republicans never once talked about the need for conservative judges in the '06 campaign.

You conservatives who refused to support Republicans, you too are partially to blame for our current state.

107 posted on 11/13/2006 5:17:01 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
“How does one pretend to be an innocent bystander at a mass murder.”
Abortion: the Silent Holocaust

Pro-Life PING

Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

108 posted on 11/13/2006 5:25:29 PM PST by cpforlife.org (A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

This is no different than before. They could fillibuster anyone before and can do so now. Jim Webb and Ben Nelson are likely to support Conservative nominees, so they don't really have a true majority.


111 posted on 11/13/2006 5:35:17 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Translated for the common person. You will put in who we want.
That's what happens when you have one side that won't play by the rules and the other side has no backbone.


112 posted on 11/13/2006 5:37:39 PM PST by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Does anyone here think one single GOP senator will have the balls to filibuster the Dims?

On anything at all?


113 posted on 11/13/2006 5:57:42 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
How differently things would have been if Frist had used the nuclear/Constitutional option last year.

Thanks to a few RINOs, the attempt to "go nuclear" would likely have failed. Do you have any idea, any idea on earth what that would have meant?

115 posted on 11/13/2006 6:16:54 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

If Pubs dropped the nuclear option last year, no one would be able to filibuster anymore. Wouldn't that be like shooting yourself in the foot, because now the Pubs can use it against the Dems? Or am I missing something here?


116 posted on 11/13/2006 6:28:21 PM PST by antiUNcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
The pro-abortion party. Continuing the mass murder of babies is the most important item on the demon dims agenda.

Did the fools that allowed them to win, forget that fact or did they just not give a damn?
117 posted on 11/13/2006 6:32:27 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (We'll stop calling you liberals,liberals, as soon as we find a better word for "sh*t for brains" .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

LET HIM PROPOSE WHO HE WANTS AND HAVE THEM SPEND ALL THE TIME TRYING TO DENY THEM ALL IF THEY WISH.

Let the people see that for 2008.


118 posted on 11/13/2006 6:34:01 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
How differently things would have been if Frist had used the nuclear/Constitutional option last year.

.......AND ruffle the feathers of the demo's and moderate RINOs??? sacrasm.......

119 posted on 11/13/2006 6:40:58 PM PST by pollywog (Joshua 1:9 Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx; LS; Quix; shield; ohioWfan

Ping

So much for the pro-life blue-dog democrats.


122 posted on 11/13/2006 6:49:10 PM PST by DarthVader (Conservatives aren't always right , but Liberals are almost always wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

The nuclear option would make no difference in the new Senate.


Democrats are the majority.


123 posted on 11/13/2006 6:49:24 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson