How differently things would have been if Frist had used the nuclear/Constitutional option last year.
1 posted on
11/13/2006 4:26:17 PM PST by
wagglebee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
To: wagglebee
Sen. Charles Schumer, of New York, was more strident .... "We will do everything in our power to see that that unfettered abortion happens," he told Newsday, saying filibusters should be expected. He added that Bush "will have to negotiate with us perform an abortion himself, because we'll have the majority." There ... fixed Schmuckies statement .....
To: wagglebee
Guess this is another one of those lessons we are suppose to learn, huh?
89 posted on
11/13/2006 5:00:19 PM PST by
Mo1
(Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
To: wagglebee
W just doesn't have the balls to tell them that he will veto everything they pass. If he truly understood what Democrats are (i.e., the American equivalent of Islamic Terrorists) he WOULD get the balls and veto everything...
93 posted on
11/13/2006 5:02:56 PM PST by
Gaffer
To: wagglebee
To Senator McCain and the other Republicans who cut the "Gang of 14" deal: meet your legacy. Your compromise has made it terribly difficult, well nigh impossible, to pass conservative judges.
If you and your fellow Senators had allowed the "Constitutional" option, we would get a straight up or down vote and most likely win, because several Southern Democrats would have gone along.
To: wagglebee
True. But that would have required a set on the Hill and at 1600.
100 posted on
11/13/2006 5:08:05 PM PST by
alarm rider
(Not a democrat, not a republican, not a "libertarian".. A CONSERVATIVE.)
To: wagglebee
Well if Bush is asked he should say he rejects any notion of litmus tests. he should fight this battle on his own terms and not allow them to dictate litmus tests. What did Clinton do about Republicans even thinking about applying litmust tests to his judicial nominees?
To: wagglebee
Bush can nominate who he pleases. Then we can watch the dimocrats continue to be obstructionists!
103 posted on
11/13/2006 5:09:46 PM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: wagglebee
I find it hard to believe anyone with a sane brain would run under the Party of Abortion and expect to get elected. Apparently it happens. The blue dog and moderate dems ought to call the crazy left on this, tell them to kiss grits, and work toward nominating federal judges who are originalist. No matter where we stand in the way of fiscal policy it makes sense to protect the unborn until we are certain both morally and scientifically they are not worthy of protection. Even then it still makes sense. More lives = more productivity and more taxpayers. :)
To: wagglebee
This is the result of losing power in Congress. And of course the Republicans never once talked about the need for conservative judges in the '06 campaign.
You conservatives who refused to support Republicans, you too are partially to blame for our current state.
To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
How does one pretend to be an innocent bystander at a mass murder.
Abortion: the Silent Holocaust Pro-Life PING
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
108 posted on
11/13/2006 5:25:29 PM PST by
cpforlife.org
(A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
To: wagglebee
This is no different than before. They could fillibuster anyone before and can do so now. Jim Webb and Ben Nelson are likely to support Conservative nominees, so they don't really have a true majority.
To: wagglebee
Translated for the common person. You will put in who we want.
That's what happens when you have one side that won't play by the rules and the other side has no backbone.
112 posted on
11/13/2006 5:37:39 PM PST by
IrishCatholic
(No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
To: wagglebee
Does anyone here think one single GOP senator will have the balls to filibuster the Dims?
On anything at all?
113 posted on
11/13/2006 5:57:42 PM PST by
Redbob
To: wagglebee
How differently things would have been if Frist had used the nuclear/Constitutional option last year.Thanks to a few RINOs, the attempt to "go nuclear" would likely have failed. Do you have any idea, any idea on earth what that would have meant?
To: wagglebee
If Pubs dropped the nuclear option last year, no one would be able to filibuster anymore. Wouldn't that be like shooting yourself in the foot, because now the Pubs can use it against the Dems? Or am I missing something here?
To: wagglebee
The pro-abortion party. Continuing the mass murder of babies is the most important item on the demon dims agenda.
Did the fools that allowed them to win, forget that fact or did they just not give a damn?
117 posted on
11/13/2006 6:32:27 PM PST by
F.J. Mitchell
(We'll stop calling you liberals,liberals, as soon as we find a better word for "sh*t for brains" .)
To: wagglebee
LET HIM PROPOSE WHO HE WANTS AND HAVE THEM SPEND ALL THE TIME TRYING TO DENY THEM ALL IF THEY WISH.
Let the people see that for 2008.
118 posted on
11/13/2006 6:34:01 PM PST by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: wagglebee
How differently things would have been if Frist had used the nuclear/Constitutional option last year. .......AND ruffle the feathers of the demo's and moderate RINOs??? sacrasm.......
119 posted on
11/13/2006 6:40:58 PM PST by
pollywog
(Joshua 1:9 Have not I commanded thee? Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid,)
To: onyx; LS; Quix; shield; ohioWfan
Ping
So much for the pro-life blue-dog democrats.
122 posted on
11/13/2006 6:49:10 PM PST by
DarthVader
(Conservatives aren't always right , but Liberals are almost always wrong.)
To: wagglebee
The nuclear option would make no difference in the new Senate.
Democrats are the majority.
123 posted on
11/13/2006 6:49:24 PM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson