Posted on 11/12/2006 2:43:11 PM PST by kronos77
BELGRADE -- Aleksandar Popović says Ahtisaari’s postponement of Kosovo status due to Serbia’s elections is an excuse. “Ahtisaari’s plan to secretly, working behind our backs, draft a paper on Kosovo’s independence fell through. The real reason why it fell through is Russia’s firm and principled position that UN Charter cannot be breached, and it would appear Ahtisaari understood the Russian ‘no’ quite clearly”, science minister Aleksandar Popović says. Popović, of prime minister Koštunica’s Democratic Party of Serbia (DSS), believes that the best option Martti Ahtisaari has at this time is to step down and let an impartial and objective international mediator take over. “Our government is sending out a clear warning that any unilateral recognition of Kosovo’s independence would have serious consequences. This applies to the NATO countries in particular, those that bombarded Serbia [in 1999]. In that case we would have to ask whether Serbia was in fact bombarded so that 15 percent of our territory could be taken away“, Popović told journalists.
Ping
What're the Serbs gonna do? Turn their weather machine against all who recognize Kosovo?
It's going to be a fun January.
Depressing business. Clinton fought this war on the wrong side, probably so he could get a cut of the Albanian drug business, judging from his earlier career.
Bush has refused to admit that clinton was wrong. If he hasn't done so in six years, he certainly won't know. The Russians will try to help their Little Brother Serbs, but it's not likely to go anywhere.
It's a terrible precedent, going in, bombing a civilian population, taking a province away from a sovereign nation, and handing it over to drug-smuggling, terrorist Muslims. But there it is, nearly a fait accompli.
If only this was the exception to an otherwise stellar example of that 'Shining City Upon A Hill'. Empire building has been around since before recorded history, they employ the same tactics, though the technology changes, the methods and motives remain constant, and ever damned last one of them ended the very damned same way
doing the same things over and over again, each time expecting a totally different result. Sounds pretty 'progressive' to me!
Tracking Covert Actions into the Future
http://mediafilter.org/caq/CovOps.html
Kosovo is not going to happen Helot!
I have no faith in the US State department to seriously know what is going on.
The fact that the X41 crowd is back in action for GWBush is 100% a BAD sign.
I guess you're planning on the foreign "peace keepers" being there forever 'cause the minute they leave, Kosovo will return to Serbia as justice and the Serbian Army return.
Too bad for you, Dhimmi. Take your kneepads elsewhere.
Yes, Hoplite, Serbia will turn its weather machine on all who recognize a bogusly indpendent KLA state. How did you know about the Tesla weather machine?
It's already happened.
You're just too dense to see it.
['It's going to be a fun January."]
Yes, and the weather can get cold...indeed, very cold my good friend.
He's just an Osshole!
Ah yes, the good old days. Are we going to resurrect the heady optimism of those days except substitute Serbs for the KLA as far as who's doing the ambushing?
Do tell.
Yeah sure Helot.
The Euroweenies are waking to the fact of Albanian Muslman mafiosi...but you have some sort of Stockholm syndrome playing a game in your head.
I look forward to it.
They why are they sending in their version; of "Sins of the Father"; Wisner as Envoy. It's amazing the private joke they have going. Frankie boy simply finishing what his Dad has started in the late 1940's.
Today we have...
" Frank Wisner legacy
It looks like Wisner had a behind the scenes role in the Balkans for years. Scroll to: Holbrooke's Best Friend to be the US Special Envoy for Kosovo Status Talks:
Former US Ambassador turned businessman Frank Wisner is said to have been selected to become Washington 's envoy in the Kosovo status negotiations, the Belgrade media reported on a Reuters news item. The news agency commented that, through this appointment, the US are demonstrating the wish to give encouragement to the negotiations and get the job done in the right way. Wisner, who served in India, the Philippines, Egypt, and Zambia, is accused by his critics for having worked for the CIA all that time, and for having promoted the interests of the former powerful energy company Enron."
Enron-CIA scandal about that Dabhol plant when Wisner was US ambassador to India. The Power Elite: Enron and Frank Wisner: A Wisner staffer told InterPress Services that "if anybody asked the CIA to help promote US business in India, it was probably Frank." Greater Albania is a major US strategic aim to safeguard the route of the Albania-Macedonia-Bulgaria Oil pipeline [AMBO] and to ensure US regional hegemony. In January 1997, Edward Ferguson, "Director of Oil & Gas Development in Brown & Root, was appointed President & CEO of AMBO."
and in the past..............
The CIA and Greater Albania: The Origins of the US Role in the Balkans
By Carl K. Savich
http://www.serbianna.com/columns/savich/057.shtml
"The US even sent aid and weapons to a Communist country. Following the 1948 split between Joseph Stalin and Josip Broz Tito, the Yugoslav government requested through CIA channels that the US provide arms to Yugoslavia , fearing an invasion by the USSR . Frank Lindsay, the Office of Policy Co-ordination (OPC) deputy to Frank Wisner, recalled: Tito was the man for the West to back
We sent him five shiploads of weapons.
The US and UK were also determined to keep the Communist guerrillas in Greece from taking power. Operation Valuable/Fiend was also a diversionary operation meant to deny bases for Greek Communist insurgents and to divert Soviet or Communist resources away from Greece .
Operation Valuable/Fiend
British foreign secretary Ernest Bevin approved the MI6 operation to overthrow the Hoxha regime in February, 1949. The chief of MI6, Stewart Menzies, was not enthusiastic about the paramilitary operation but saw it as a way to appease the former SOE stinks and bangs people. The Albanian regime change was a rollback operation meant to detach Albania , a captive nation, from the Soviet bloc. Strategically, the UK and US objective was to establish a strategic presence on the Balkan peninsula . The British wanted the US to finance the operation and to provide bases. Senior British intelligence officer William Hayter, who chaired the Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC), came to Washington in March with a group of Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) members and Foreign Office staff that included Gladwyn Jebb, Earl Jellicoe, and Peter Dwyer of MI6 and a Balkans specialist. They met with Robert Joyce of the US State Departments Policy and Planning Staff (PPS) and Frank Wisner, who was the head of the Office of Policy Co-ordination (OPC), which was administered by the CIA. Wisner had been an attorney who had represented the financial interests of wealthy Albanian refugees who had been members of the Nazi-fascist collaborative group, the Balli Kombetar. So there had also been a monetary connection between US intelligence and the former Nazi/fascist Albanian Balli Kombetar members..........
and.......
" By 1952, the CIA had taken over all the intelligence operations of the British in the Balkans. On July 23, 1951, the US air dropped 12 commandos in Albania Six were killed immediately, four were surrounded and burned to death in a house, and two were captured. The operation was a complete disaster. Abas Ermenji did not want to witness any more of his Balli Kombetar followers to take another tumble through the meat grinder and so discouraged any more missions. Wisner, nevertheless, sought to continue the pixie incursions, having the support of CIA Deputy Director Allen Dulles. The CIA airdropped Hamit Matjani, the Tiger, in 1952, who was killed during this operation, his 16th mission. Dulles stated: At least were getting the experience we need for the next war.
Up to 200 agents would be killed during the operation with an estimated additional several thousand Albanian civilians killed in reprisal. Abas Ermenji stated: Our allies wanted to make use of Albania as a guinea-pig, without caring about the human losses, for an absurd enterprise that was condemned to failure. Halil Nerguti stated: We were used as an experiment. We were a small part of a big game, pawns that could be sacrificed. There is no question that the CIA and MI6 used the operation as a small-scale exercise in regime change. The stakes were small. Failure would not be noticed. John H. Richardson, the CIA Director of the South-East Division, terminated Operation Fiend and by 1954 the Company 400 was disbanded and the training facilities in Heidelberg , Germany shut down, as well as the CIA base on the Greek island. The remaining Albanians were resettled in the US , UK , and the Commonwealth countries...........
he's right, with the exception of the mule trains....which would offer little or no serious resupply capability. I'm glad you offered this link. It's shows how one sided and brainwashed that you are. Ever since 2001....imagine that....who would ever have thunk it...:))
Kosovo Status: Delay Is Risky
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
11 Oct 06 (crisisgroup.org) - The Kosovo final status process risks breaking down the further the decision is pushed back into 2007. The six-nation Contact Group that has sponsored the process must at a minimum deliver a timely endorsement of the settlement package that UN envoy Martti Ahtisaari should present before the end of January. The UN Security Council must also pass a resolution superseding 1244 (1999) to allow the UN Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) to transfer its responsibilities to Kosovos government and pave the way for new international bodies being readied by the EU. Acting together, the U.S. and the EU need to show the political will to recognize Kosovo as independent, and fend off partition moves from Serbia and the Serb north of Kosovo.
How some key actors will behave remains unpredictable. Russia may refuse consensus in the Contact Group and block decisions in the Security Council; not all EU member states are at ease with the likely outcome. While it is uncertain whether Serbia will offer serious or only token resistance to Kosovo independence, it will certainly support the Serb norths bid to break completely with independent Kosovo. But the two thirds of Kosovo Serbs south of the Ibar River are not yet planning to leave: will Belgrade urge them to flee Kosovo or allow them to come to terms with the new state of affairs? Another question is whether the U.S. and EU will put resources behind repeated verbal commitments not to allow partition.
The direction in which matters seem to be moving offers much potential for instability. Due primarily to Russia, the Security Council will likely endorse only the narrowest of formulas for Kosovos independence. Ahtisaari will have to strip his settlement package of all symbolic and some functional elements of independence to get it through the Council.
Despite international officials denials, the settlement taking shape may resemble Bosnias Dayton Agreement more than Macedonias Ohrid. The prerogatives contemplated for the projected post-status International Community Representative are growing, and a less complete transfer of power to Kosovos own government is being envisaged. Kosovos deep Albanian-Serb cleavage, and fears of the latters exodus or suppression, have prompted Ahtisaari to craft decentralization provisions that largely insulate most Kosovo Serbs from Pristina and give Belgrade continuing influence. The hope is that this will aid a peaceful, stable transition. The price will be difficult institutional arrangements that it may be necessary to disentangle later for EU accession purposes.
Kosovos relative stability over the past year should not encourage the international community to imagine it has the luxury of finessing both sides. It has already indulged a Serbian constitutional process intended to undermine the international communitys plans for Kosovo, helping thereby to consolidate Belgrade behind retrogressive electoral practices and ideologies of the Milosevic era. Ahtisaari agreed on 10 November to delay presentation of his proposal after Belgrade set a definite 21 January 2007 date for parliamentary elections.
It is important that no further slippage take place. Further delay would be taken in Belgrade not as a cue to cooperate with an orderly Kosovo process but as a further opportunity to wreck it. Kosovo Albanian social and political fragility offer Belgrade a last opportunity to change the outcome. And delay much into 2007 would severely test Kosovo Albanian cohesion. Politicians have promised their constituents independence this year and have articulated no vision for the period after. They have marginal capacity to implement precisely the complex choreography the international community envisages as producing independence.
The longer the Kosovo Albanians are forced to wait, the greater the chance they will discredit themselves with unilateral independence moves or riots. The pendulum of international support and sympathy would then swing away from them, as after the March 2004 riots. That would virtually finish prospects for retaining the Serbs of the north in a multi-ethnic Kosovo and see many leave the south. Instead of finally closing the question of western Balkan borders with an orderly Kosovo settlement, a new destabilizing chapter would be opened.
RECOMMENDATIONS
To the Contact Group (U.S., UK, France, Germany, Italy, and Russia):
1. Act without delay on the settlement package to be presented by UN envoy Ahtisaari, and without watering it down.
To the United Nations Security Council:
2. Pass at the earliest opportunity a resolution that endorses the Ahtisaari package; supersedes Resolution 1244 (1999); brings to an end the UN Mission in Kosovo and redistributes its powers to Kosovos government and the new international presences stipulated in the Ahtisaari package.
Our government is sending out a clear warning that any unilateral recognition of Kosovos independence would have serious consequences. This applies to the NATO countries in particular, those that bombarded Serbia [in 1999]. In that case we would have to ask whether Serbia was in fact bombarded so that 15 percent of our territory could be taken away.
This can of warms was planned deliberatelly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.