Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Corruption Case Resurfaces For Alcee Hastings
statesman.com ^ | 11-10-06 | Julia Malone

Posted on 11/11/2006 8:33:19 PM PST by doug from upland

Corruption Case Resurfaces For Alcee Hastings

By Julia Malone | Friday, November 10, 2006, 11:06 AM

With Rep. Alcee Hastings a frontrunner to be House Intelligence Committee chairman, he’s already facing unpleasant publicity stemming from his involvement in a corruption case years ago.

The Florida Democrat, a former federal district judge, was acquitted of conspiring to solicit a bribe from criminal defendants in 1982. But after a jury found attorney William Borders guilty of being his co-conspirator, Hastings was impeached and removed from the federal bench by Congress in 1989.

Hastings then won a seat in the House of Representatives. Borders, who refused to testify against him in the bribery case, went to prison and won a pardon from President Clinton in 2001.

The case didn’t die there. Borders has twice petitioned the District of Columbia Office of Bar Counsel to reinstate him to practice law. His latest request went all the way to the Supreme Court, where the facts of the bribery conspiracy, the Hastings role and Borders’ refusal to testify were laid out once again.

The high court in September 2003 declined to grant a hearing on the Borders disbarment.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: corruption; dems; hastings; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: goodnesswins

He was impeached and removed from the federal bench. Separately, the Senate could have stipulated that he not ever be allowed to hold a federal office again. They decided not to do that. A few years later, after he was elected to congress, someone on the committee was asked about it and they said they didn't think it was necessary because they didn't believe he would ever get appointed or elected to anything. Hastings just walked through a loophole.


21 posted on 11/11/2006 9:07:44 PM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Hey, nice work!

My memory on this is a hazy, but wasn't Hastings' conviction overturned or something a few years ago? Maybe that isn't even possible, but I thought I heard something like that a while back. Then again, maybe I'm just confused.


22 posted on 11/11/2006 9:09:20 PM PST by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
GOOD! It's about time this country stood up for our rights to have a congress and government made up of people who have better ethics than Hastings has! Hope this story doesn't die anytime soon- althouhg I doubt the MSM will be giving it quite the attention that the extremely nation rivitting 'Maccacca debacle' got- yawn.

Christian news and commentary at: sacredscoop.com ...

23 posted on 11/11/2006 9:09:57 PM PST by CottShop (http://sacredscoop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

no, no no!

First, Democrats necessarily possess far greater intelligence then the rest of us. And Democrats in Congress think on a plane that we mere plebes--even Republican professionals with graduate degrees--cannot hope to comprehend.

Second, no Democrat EVER partakes in corruption. The definitions of the words of the English language implicitly exclude Democrats from corruption or any other fault; only Republicans can be corrupted.

Third, embryonic stem cells are morally wrong, ethically indefensible, and unable to serve any legitimate medical purpose.

Fourth, we do not wish such terrible maladies as brain cancer our fellow man, even our worst enemy. We love Democrats and treat them with kindness, but as conservatives, we simply desire that they refrain from seeking or exercising any elective, appointive, or other office of trust or profit under the United States until they successfully overcome the mental illness of liberalism.


24 posted on 11/11/2006 9:10:19 PM PST by dufekin (The New York Times: an enemy espionage agency with a newsletter of enemy propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins; doug from upland
I can't believe someone of this disrepute is even ELIGIBLE for Congress.....let alone a Committee Chairmanship

The 'RATS who ran Congress in 1989 were so incompetent that they forgot to write language (that is usually included) into the articles of impeachment that would have barred the House could have barred him from taking office after he was elected, but the 'RATS were so corrupt, they wouldn't do it.

25 posted on 11/11/2006 9:11:12 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird

Indeed, lets ram it back down their throats.


26 posted on 11/11/2006 9:12:35 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; leadpenny

Thanks.....I get it now.


27 posted on 11/11/2006 9:12:56 PM PST by goodnesswins (I think the real problem is islamo-bombia! (Rummyfan))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RussP

He was not convicted in regular criminal court. He tried to have the impeachment conviction overturned, but the Supreme Court would not take the case.


28 posted on 11/11/2006 9:14:22 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Alter Kaker

I hope so.


29 posted on 11/11/2006 9:17:30 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

I wonder. If he gets appointed, will it be bad news because a flagrant crook has access to classified information, or is it good news because every time he appears in the news, he makes Democrats look bad?


30 posted on 11/11/2006 9:34:03 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (Corporatism is not conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
The ONLY hope the Democrats have of pretending any semblance of professionalism, integrity and honesty - is to deny all their morons the chairmanships their seniority entitles them to assume....

The fact these idiots achieved seniority because they come from safe racist districts - doesn't mean the nation should be put at risk by their OBVIOUS incompetence and ignorance.

Semper Fi
31 posted on 11/11/2006 9:34:44 PM PST by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Yes Doug... RAT FIGHTS......
32 posted on 11/11/2006 10:15:08 PM PST by tflabo (Take authority that's ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

In some states, felons are not to vote in an election. BUT, Hastings can be elected and make decisions that effect our country? THIS IS BACKWARDS.


33 posted on 11/11/2006 10:19:42 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush
Taking dirty money? Perjured testimony? No wonder Clinton pardoned him!

Everything goes in the democRATic party, including clinton's rape, "none" oral sex in the Oval Office, his impeachment and a plethora of corruptions, lack of ethical and moral values, you name it!!!

34 posted on 11/11/2006 10:29:32 PM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Doug, did I ever tell you what a genius you are? Thanks.


35 posted on 11/11/2006 10:53:18 PM PST by AliVeritas (In Victory, Be magnanimous, in Defeat, Defiant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
I can't believe someone of this disrepute is even ELIGIBLE for Congress.....let alone a Committee Chairmanship

You kidding? You're thinking of the Republican Party. This stuff is routine, no-big-deal for the Democrats.

36 posted on 11/11/2006 11:02:38 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird
C'mon man. Get with the program!

It's not corruption if it's their corruption.

37 posted on 11/11/2006 11:07:50 PM PST by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

He is my congressman by some special arrangement. It is a district gerrymandered to represent blacks, and he is untouchable. He is not accessable to constituents and is never home, even in emergencies When I asked an employee of the FL R party how we could get a real congressman, she said to move.


38 posted on 11/11/2006 11:11:33 PM PST by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Well, I think I can safely say this is one corruption case we won't read about in the NYT.


39 posted on 11/12/2006 3:39:45 AM PST by I still care ("Remember... for it is the doom of men that they forget" - Merlin, from Excalibur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

They're all members of a vast, corrupt race known as...

...mankind.


40 posted on 11/12/2006 3:43:45 AM PST by Silly (still being silly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson