Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt Gingrich, the Once and Future "Architect"?
Friday, November 10, 2006 | Momaw Nadon

Posted on 11/10/2006 6:52:35 PM PST by Momaw Nadon

IMHO, Newt Gingrich won't be elected President, but he is far and away the best choice for the post of top Republican strategist. Whether this is in the RNC or somewhere else, I don't know.

He needs to call the shots in 2008 while maintaining a low public profile. He can be the true "architect" of conservative victory once more. He led us to victory in 1994. He can do so again in 2008.

Gingrich should be to Romney what Rove is to Bush.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008; architect; banglist; gingrich; newt; president; romney; rove; strategist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-164 next last
To: reaganandme

I don't believe Romney is more conservative than he shows....in fact I believe he is flat out moderate like McCain and Guiliani.


61 posted on 11/10/2006 7:34:13 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (It looks like one of those days when one nuke is just not enough-- Lt. Col. Mitchell, SG-1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

Newt is a coward and an asshole:
when last elected to the House, he immediately resigned, leaving the then-Dimocrat governor of Georgia to name a - surprise, surprise! - Dimocrat to take his place.

He took campaign money and votes from his constituents and left them in the lurch without so much as an apology, contenting himself with doing the talk-show circuit.


62 posted on 11/10/2006 7:35:08 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
He has the ideas, and he knows how to inspire the base. Definitely someone you would want to be your architect.
63 posted on 11/10/2006 7:35:13 PM PST by Uncle Vlad (You cannot protect the peoples' civil liberties if you refuse to protect the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

I don't think removing Rummy during the election cycle would have done any good. The terrorists in Iraqi would feel emboldened to step up their October murder spree. Also the rATS could say, "See, the Bush Doctrine is a failure."


64 posted on 11/10/2006 7:35:45 PM PST by Kuksool (I learned more about political science on FR than in college)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: StoneWall Brigade
That Boob took back the house in 94 and brought life back into the Republican party

Thanks for making my argument for me

1.In 94 the Contract was a wonderful thing -I really liked it but it meant ZIPPO at the polls
Exit polling showed the VAST VAST majority of voters didn't know what the hell it was

Clinton with his Gun Control--Gays in the military --abortion policy drove Gun Owners and Christian Conservatives into the GOP
That is who to thank for 94

2. After the rout of the democrats political genius Newt comes and and says he is going to shut down the goverment --Clinton handed him his head

3. In 98 giddy over Clinton's scandals Ol Newt predicted another 25-30 seats in the house ( over the 55 the GOP got in 94 )Where did he think they were coming from -GOP lost a few seats

4. After the 98 election and his sordid affair he has to resign

His policies and view of government and foreign affairs is fantastic

His political acumen is minimal
65 posted on 11/10/2006 7:38:31 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
Romney the candidate with Gingrich as his strategist seems to be a good combination to me.

I am beginning to think so too. Gingrich is an asset as a background person, but I think his baggage will bar him from being elected president. Like it or not, how he conducted himself during his two prior marriages (the second of which was during his middle age) will be seen as indicative of his character.

I am not completely sold on Romney, and I do think that his Mormon religion will turn off some voters. Nevertheless, he appears to be the best candidate out there so far. Plenty of time for someone else to emerge however, and as all of us learned this week, a lot can happen in two years.

66 posted on 11/10/2006 7:39:50 PM PST by LWalk18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

This link shows his positions from an ACLU point of view. This liberal didn't like him either. Page 2 shows John McCain. Page 3 is Pataki. Romney looks OK based on this.

Gun control? Yeah, he was in MA and implemented an assault rifle ban. I think it's amazing he is as conservative as he is and elected in MA. I like what I see so far.


http://civilliberty.about.com/od/profiles/ig/2008-Republican-Candidates/Mitt-Romney.htm


67 posted on 11/10/2006 7:40:53 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt_fan

--but I, for one, prefer a Republican in the White House
-----
Well, I much prefer a conservative over a Republican, to be quite precise. Nothing else is acceptable and while I don't agree with your total assessment of Newt, show me a better conservative, patriotic, non-liberal candidate....and I will vote for him. And I also do not agree he is not electable. If he (or any other qualified candidate) stands and FIGHTS FROM A CONSERVATIVE POSITION and nails the libs for what they are -- they can win.

This is where the Repubs failed us -- they did not fight, and they were not conservative. They signed their own death sentence. As such, the libs won NOTHING, and did nothing because they have no advertisable platform. The Repubs gave them the contest.


68 posted on 11/10/2006 7:42:20 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: PatrickF4
baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage, baggage

Old tired trite mantra buzzward.

He put together a very important concept in the early 1990s. Do you know what it is?

69 posted on 11/10/2006 7:43:37 PM PST by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Ditto to that !!!


70 posted on 11/10/2006 7:43:42 PM PST by Dustbunny (The BIBLE - Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Can he get the gun vote?

That is my real problem with all the proposed candidates.

I have hard time believing they can.
71 posted on 11/10/2006 7:44:18 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

Been out of town. Where is that stupid bastard Rove?


72 posted on 11/10/2006 7:45:03 PM PST by satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
I'd vote for him for any office he cared to run for. The man is brilliant.

Ditto that.

He has "TOO MUCH BAGGAGE." didn't you hear? (barf)

73 posted on 11/10/2006 7:47:12 PM PST by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon
MA is a snake pit.

Kennedy

The entire Kennedy clan.

Kerry.

Barney Frank...

Michael Dukakis

Tip O'Neal

There was that gangster whose name I forget that has been on the lam for several years whose brother is what? The mayor of Boston or something. What he is is not the point.

MA is a snake pit and there is no way anyone can survive in a snake pit other than a big tough mean snake, because snakes also eat each other.

To reach high office in MA, one would have to have made deals that ethical people would not accept.

I know nothing about the man, but you have to use your brain. No one survives in a snake pit except another snake.

I can't think of any politician that came out of MA that I would want to see President.
74 posted on 11/10/2006 7:48:23 PM PST by woodbutcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
You make a good Argument even tho i disagree with you 100% you still make good Argument
75 posted on 11/10/2006 7:48:27 PM PST by StoneWall Brigade (Rick Santorum Chairman of the RNC!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper
The last thing we need is that flippen RINO. Haven't we had enough of that crappola.

Who is a RINO?

76 posted on 11/10/2006 7:48:57 PM PST by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Thanks for the link!

Mitt Romney

Abortion and Birth Control:

* Opposes Roe v. Wade.
* Believes that abortion should be banned in all cases except rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother.
* Vetoed an emergency contraception bill in July 2005.
However:
+ Has kept campaign promise not to tamper with state abortion laws.
+ Said in 1994: "I had a dear, close family relative that was very close to me who passed away from an illegal abortion ... [W]e will not force our beliefs on others on [abortion]. And you will not see me wavering on that." Romney has in fact wavered on that, but probably more out of political expediency than anything else.

Death Penalty:

* Made a quixotic attempt to reinstate the Massachusetts death penalty in 2005.

Gay Rights:

* Has used strong anti-gay rhetoric in recent years in an apparent effort to distance himself from his state's position in favor of gay marriage.
* Supports the Federal Marriage Amendment.
* Opposes civil unions.
* Has made statements in opposition to gay adoptions.
* Fired an openly gay member of the state appellate tax board, then refused to explain why.

Gun Rights:

* Signed a permanent ban on "assault weapons" in 2004.
* Has a C- rating from the NRA, which is almost unheard of for a Republican.

Immigrants' Rights:

* In 2004, vetoed a bill that would have allowed undocumented immigrants to attend Massachusetts public universities at in-state tuition rates.
* Recently proposed deputizing state troopers to arrest suspected undocumented immigrants, despite the fact that state troopers are not trained in immigration law.

Rights of the Homeless:

* Drastically cut state-run alcohol and drug abuse prevention programs for the homeless.

War on Terror:

* In September 2005, he suggested that the FBI wiretap mosques and spy on new Muslim immigrants.


77 posted on 11/10/2006 7:50:40 PM PST by Momaw Nadon ("...with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt_fan

Newt's my second favorite politician, Cheney is my favorite, 67 is the new 70 right?

I'd pay a few dollars for a "CHENEY/GINGRICH '08" bumper sticker. I commute on 95 in a major metro area, the shock value would be a little poke in the eye to all the commies.


78 posted on 11/10/2006 7:51:17 PM PST by IYAAYAS (Live free or die trying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
No, but do you know how many gum balls are in this jar?

Sorry to be buzzing like a bee with buzzwords, but if you want to focus on the words, then perhaps you are evading the idea - If Newt comes back, he'll be like Richard Nixon, hounded to death.

79 posted on 11/10/2006 7:52:18 PM PST by PatrickF4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: dubie

There are a lot here that love to use the "BAGGAGE" buzzword. Reminds me of the liberals whose mantra is, "Bush's Fault!"


80 posted on 11/10/2006 7:52:36 PM PST by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson