Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

So the base held. If true, that's encouraging.
1 posted on 11/09/2006 4:58:46 AM PST by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: Leroy S. Mort

When Ken "purse strings" Mehlman called me to donate, I gave him heck about pulling the old democrat trick of just trying to scare people.
The entire thing was just like the democrats saying " Republicans want to hurt women, children and the elderly".
His was "vote Republican or Nancy will be house leader".
He would not support most Conservatives.
I call for "Purse Strings" to step down.


2 posted on 11/09/2006 5:02:36 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort

Yeah, an if we had budget-balancing spending cutting Congress, we would have done better with the base and better with Independants. Instead the GOP was looked at like a bunch of big special-interest pork-barrel free spenders.


3 posted on 11/09/2006 5:02:52 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort

Wait until the Independents get two years of Nancy Pelosi, John Conyers, Barney Frank, Harry Reid, and Hillary.


4 posted on 11/09/2006 5:03:13 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort
``The one thing that is so frustrating is when you hear the Karl Roves and Ken Mehlmans talking about focusing on the base because there are no swing voters,'

Rove's concept of "the base" (how do you say that in Arabic?) is flawed because his base is not now, and never will be a majority.

What's happened is that the Liberty voter has been pushed out - and somebody, preferably somebody other than Karl Rove, is going to have to figure out how to get him back.

5 posted on 11/09/2006 5:04:50 AM PST by Jim Noble (To preserve the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Hispanics backed Democrats 69-30 - after backing Democrats 61-37 in 2002.

Ah hell, lets just legalize them all and we'll never be in a position higher than city dog catcher again, if that.
7 posted on 11/09/2006 5:10:22 AM PST by Tolsti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort
So the base held. If true, that's encouraging.

Not if the base continues to make the tent smaller.

8 posted on 11/09/2006 5:10:31 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Mehlman's spokeswoman, Tracey Schmitt, countered that the RNC chairman has been working hard for the last couple of years to expand the party ``to expand the number of swing voters who call themselves Republicans.''

When you try to stand for everything you stand for nothing. You lost because the RNC does not stand for anything.

12 posted on 11/09/2006 5:11:57 AM PST by Hazcat (Live to party, work to afford it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort

So the AP implies that Republicans were not Liberal enough and that's why they lost.

Interesting that despite all the "comprehensive immigration reform," the Democrats got an even higher percentage of Hispanic votes. What a waste of time the administration spent courting the votes of illegals and those that support them. If they started building a wall 2 years ago, when we had Republican majorities, they might have brought in "independent" voters instead of turning them away. Now the money earmarked for the wall will be spent on comfort stations in the desert for illegal aliens.


15 posted on 11/09/2006 5:14:33 AM PST by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort

40-20-40...........


19 posted on 11/09/2006 5:19:08 AM PST by Red Badger (New! HeadOn Hemorrhoid Medication for Liberals!.........Apply directly to forehead.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort

Well, at least we know that Neil Boortz is happy!


22 posted on 11/09/2006 5:22:15 AM PST by Obadiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort

"``The Republican base turned out and held,'' said Whit Ayres, a GOP strategist"

There is a guy that needs fired. Someone that takes hard lessons and twists them around to justify a losing agenda. How Clintonesque.


44 posted on 11/09/2006 5:48:29 AM PST by FreeInWV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort
"So the base held. If true, that's encouraging."

I don't think the base is too thrilled with simply choosing the lesser of two evils, however.

45 posted on 11/09/2006 5:49:24 AM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort

I wish the he** this idea of Independent voters would just shut the F*** up. They are not and, there is no such a thing as an Independent voter, they are Democrats, nothing more or nothing less. I watch the senate and I watch the house when they are in session. I watch the voting from both sides of the isles and the so call Independent always votes democrat.
So lets call a spade what it is and drop this word Independent and call it what it is, Democrat!!!!!!!!!!!


48 posted on 11/09/2006 5:50:24 AM PST by buck61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort
Islamic murderers backed the socialist 100-0 after backing them 100-0 in the last election.

Homosexuals backed the socialist 100-0 after backing them 105-0 in the last election.

Communists backed the socialist dims 100-0 after backing them 105-0 in the last election.

Dead people backed the socialists 100-0 after backing them 100-0 in the last election.

The French backed the socialist 100-0 after backing them 100-0 in the last election.

Illegals backed the dims 100-0 after backing them 100-0 in the last election.

The stupids, baby makers, drunks, felons, drug addicts, wannabees, has beens, bums, drop outs, backed the socialists 100-0 after backing them 100-0 in the past elections.

Just wanted the total voting record made public. /sarcasm still on.

54 posted on 11/09/2006 5:59:30 AM PST by RetiredArmy (America lost it's mind Nov. 7th. The Republic has now started its decline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort
This confirms my previous posts about this election, and most others. Each side has a 40% base, its that middle 20% that we fight for. That 20 percent is usually politically shallow, and unfortunately for us, they get most of their news from TV.

We had been winning them for a decade, but this time, we lost em. Why? They were sick if Iraq. Thats it. Nothing else really mattered. Had Iraq rebuilt itself a year ago and we had been able to pull out and everything went ok, Republicans would have won. I hear alot of whining about Republicans not being Conservative enough, and personally, I AGREE with that assessment, but I am not so sure the swing voters gave a cr*p about that.

61 posted on 11/09/2006 6:11:47 AM PST by Paradox (American Conservatives: Keeping the world safe for Liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort

When you can't tell the difference between Dems and Repubs something is wrong.


64 posted on 11/09/2006 6:20:18 AM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort

"hold on to base" = "base voting AGAINST Democrats, not FOR Republicans" (that is essentially what I did)


65 posted on 11/09/2006 6:33:45 AM PST by RatRipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort
I spot some errors of omission in this piece. They said Republicans voted Democrat but according to the same exit polls they are quoting, more democrats voted Republican than Republicans voted democrat. 11% Republicans voting democrat as opposed to 16% democrats voting Republican. I wonder why they left that out. I guess it wouldn't allow them to make the claim that Republicans voted democrat in large numbers. I don't think alot of Pubbies voted democrat. I think they just didn't vote. So many "rightous" Christains who have never sinned, I guess.

Another thing I noticed, Hispanics voted for dems, too. Are you listening, President Bush? What really surprised me the most was that Asians voted for the dems. I am taking it that Asians would be mostly Oriental. Big business, which according to the exit polls, went mostly Repub. So it just doesn't make sense.

68 posted on 11/09/2006 6:59:33 AM PST by beckysueb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort

 

Hosted by FreeImageHosting.net Free Image Hosting Service

 


76 posted on 11/09/2006 7:12:27 AM PST by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leroy S. Mort

I think they are incorrect about the base holding.


78 posted on 11/09/2006 7:14:46 AM PST by Netizen (When a candidate fails to appeal to enough voters, to get elected, whose fault is that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson