Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Partial Birth Abortion Case - "I'm Convinced Kennedy will vote with Us"
LifeSiteNews ^ | 11/8/06 | John-Henry Westen

Posted on 11/08/2006 2:41:32 PM PST by wagglebee

WASHINGTON, November 8, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Moments after the hearing of oral arguments in the partial-birth abortion case before the United States Supreme Court today, a pro-life lawyer involved in the case is predicting a "major victory". Jay Sekulow, Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), said that he is convinced the ban on partial birth abortion will be ruled constitutional.

The ACLJ has filed amicus briefs in both cases before the Supreme Court - including one on behalf of some 80 members of Congress - including the sponsors of the federal ban on the gruesome procedure.

In 2000, the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to reject the state ban on partial-birth abortion by Nebraska. Now, the high court - with two new Justices - heard oral arguments in two cases challenging the federal ban on the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. "Three of the Justices - Justices Kennedy, Scalia, Thomas - already have compared this procedure to infanticide when the court rejected Nebraska's state ban six years ago," said Sekulow.

Since that time Bush appointees to the Supreme Court John Roberts and Samuel Alito have joined the court. Alito replaced Sandra Day O'Connor who supported striking down the Nebraska law banning partial-birth abortion.

Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Alito and Roberts are expected to vote in favour of the federal ban. While Kennedy has voted in favour of such a ban in the past, his vote is uncertain. However, after attending the hearings today, Sekulow said of Justice Kennedy, "Based on the questions that he asked and the answers that were given I am convinced that he will in fact stay with us and find the partial-birth abortion ban act constitutional."

Sekulow added: "The federal ban discussed today was the result of extensive Congressional hearings that produced a sound, constitutional solution to ending an abhorrent practice that is never medically necessary. The Solicitor General did an excellent job of presenting the government's case in support of the ban. We're hopeful that a majority of the Justices will conclude what most Americans already know: the federal ban on partial-birth abortion is a valid - indeed essential - barrier against infanticide."

Although the Justices voted this afternoon, a decision is not expected till June.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aclj; anthonykennedy; moralabsolutes; partialbirthabortion; prolife; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: greccogirl

I should have clarified that he was funny as hell. The disability wasn't. I remember him always making me laugh.


61 posted on 11/09/2006 11:57:38 AM PST by combat_boots (The MSM: State run Democrat media masquerading as corporations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Whew! I feel better then. :-)


62 posted on 11/09/2006 12:12:36 PM PST by greccogirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: greccogirl

It's ok.

I remember playing a game after Thanksgiving and busting a gut with him. I was almost rolling on the floor laughing.


63 posted on 11/09/2006 1:53:19 PM PST by combat_boots (The MSM: State run Democrat media masquerading as corporations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I hope this is the case. We won't know for months though, I assume?


64 posted on 11/09/2006 5:53:51 PM PST by PghBaldy (Reporter: Are you surprised? Nancy Pelosi: No. My eyes always look like this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson