[elhombrelibre]

The real outrage is that the MSM has allowed the Democrats to get away with this, just as it now allows fellow MSM member the NYT to switch positions with its recent Website/WMD story. Now, the NYT, without batting an eye or blushing, says the Bush Administration has exposed highly dangerous information about the Iraqi WMD program and failed to protect highly classified information. Of course, the paper of Herbert Matthews, their reporter who helped pave the way for Castro by lying about his commitment to communism, and the paper of Walter Duranty, the reporter who lied about Stalin's mass murder of Ukrainians, must consider their recent whoppers on WMD small potatoes.

This is a time of war, yet the Democrats have gotten a pass on the fact that they voted for that war, they sighted the same intelligence reports as the president to justify their votes, they supported the war until it became difficult, and now they seek a collective partisan advantage by feigning collective amnesia. Obviously, the MSM has been and is their willing ally in massive dodging of their own actions, demagogic attacks, and rewriting of history.

As we get ready to vote, keep in mind that these are the Democrats who seek to take the legislative branch of government.

[o_zarkman44]

The MSM IS DEMOCRATS. Thats why they can get away with the recurring lies.

[chrismich2610]

The real problem is the Sheep who support them in their mutual wish,the fall of the U.S.A.!

[NonValueAdded]

I dunno, were their lips moving?

[Arm_Bears]

Yes--Next question?

[maine-iac7]

This reminds me - I'm adding Canada Free Press (consistanly with us) to my list of media outlets to notify of a story that need covering - per:




(Copy/paste list to your files for quick find in future)

Media emails – the formula: if they hear from 40 to 45 people on a story, they will cover it.
CAUTION: do not mass email - they won’t look at it – email singly- also : Short and sweet or they wont look at it! Include a link, if you have one.


e.d.hill@foxnews.com



Brit.Hume@foxnews.com
Myword@foxnews.com John Gibson
Weekends: Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com John Gibson
Cavuto@foxnews.com
Special@foxnews.com
Hannity@foxnews.com
Oreilly@foxnews.com
Special@foxnews.com (Brit Hume)
Studiob@foxnews.com (Shepard Smith)
writemalkin@gmail.com (Michelle Malkin)
hardball@msnbc.com
Drudge@drudgereport.com
captainsquartersblog.com
letters@canadafreepress.com Canada Free Press
hhewitt@hughhewitt.com
pundit@instapundit.com
Beltway@foxnews.com
Rush@eibnet.com
joe@msnbc.com


To get to FOX News direct – go to this link, BELOW - scroll down to small box on left = where it says Send news tip to FOXNews.com

Type your message and click submit…this might prove to be effective! (they don’t even request your name/email, etc)

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,77538,00.html

and the Washington Times page with box for comments:
http://www.washtimes.com/contact-us/

[mewzilla]

Liberalism IS a weapon of mass destruction.

[shield]

What's the difference between the Communist Party of the USA and the dem party?
Answer: THE NAME.

[Mr.Atos]

Well, the Left has been lying about Vietnam for 40 years, so what do we expect?! The real shocker is that ANYONE still listens to or votes for them.

[photodawg]

For example, a popular refrain is that President Bush lied about Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) in order to implement a grand strategy fashioned by neo-conservatives well before Bush actually took office. Said strategy was supposedly aimed at using military force to install democratic regimes friendly to the U.S. throughout the Middle East.


''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

Oh, if only this were true. We would be so much better off today. It should have happened during the 8 Clinton years, but he was too busy announcing a "peace dividend" and gutting the US military. Incidentally, what do the democrats find so repulsive about this strategy? Should we have waited until Sadam actually was producing nukes and launching them at Israel while selling them to terrorists before we interceded?

[MaineVoter2002]

Were they lying?

Check out the 4 YouTube Videos that play back to back.

http://www.cafenetamerica.com

[Edgerunner]

bump

[technomage]

A very long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, the media did a pretty good job at reporting on politicians and government. They reported abuses on both sides, they reported on illegal activities on both sides, they reported stories that politicians of both sides wanted kept hidden.

Although not perfect, it was much better than today. We the peeples need a media that keeps the government and politicians feet to the fire, no matter the political party.

That is no longer the case.

Now we have a media that is overtly and openly supporting one party over another. They report indiscretions of one party (Republicans) and ignore these same indiscretions from the other party (Democrats). If something is illegal, immoral or un-ethical because a Republican did it, the same should be said of a Democrat. To the media, this is no longer true.

The media is no longer the safety valve that we the peeples need to keep politicians and government in check, at least as much as possible. Now, if you are a liberal politician, you can do pretty much any illegal or un-ethical activity as they know the media will close their eyes. Just look at William Jefferson of Lousiana. Found with $90,000 in his freezer, the media just ignores it.

Imagine if this was a Republican.

How about Harry Reid and the numerous land deals he has done over 20 years, using his powerful influence to get zoning changes, to earn millions on devious deals. The media just ignores it.

Imagine if this was a Republican.

If something is illegal, un-ethical, immoral because a Republican did it, then this same illegal, un-ehtical, immoral thing is wrong if a Democrat did it. This is no longer true to the main stream media.

What the media is also saying, although not directly, is that the Democrat party is not ethical, they do engage in illegal activities, they are immoral. They just do not report on these things when it comes to Democrats because it is expected of them. But, heaven forbid a Republican does something like this!! Then they will destroy them in the name of keeping government and politicians honest.

Those in the media have become exactly what they were fighting against in the 60's and 70's: They have become the pawns of one party. They have become part of big government, not a safety valve against big government. They collaborate and work with the Democratic party against the Republican party, rather than keeping all politicians 'honest'. They have become exactly the thing they were fighting against: Part of the big business/big government complex.

They have become an intregal part of the thing they hated most: A tool of big government.

[RDTF]

hope we see more of this

[RDTF]

this is funny at the end:

John Lillpop is a recovering liberal, "clean and sober" since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are considered reasonable!.

[Running On Empty]

Marking

[Sue Perkick]

Liberals lie about everything.

[Twinkie]

Mia T. had a good article in her threads about how Saddam was just a year away from getting the bomb (re: confiscated Iraqi documents posted on recently removed website containing VERY sensitive nuclear bomb production secrets). He needed just one thing - yellowcake.

[kalee]

self ping for later reading

[TASMANIANRED]

Liberals lie about everything.

MSM is their mouthpiece...

[NickatNite2003]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did Liberals lie about weapons of mass destruction?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Well, of *course* they lied.