Posted on 11/04/2006 10:37:15 PM PST by chuckles
Well, usually, if I wait long enough, somebody will say what I want said, and bring the topic to a head. Not this time. I've had it with waiting.
Kerry joined the Navy in 1966. You usually join for a 6 year hitch. He got an Honorable Discharge in 1978. Is there anybody out there with any power that has a problem with that? What happened to 1972?
I have written every news organization I can and sent e-mails to reporters until I give up. I went down each show on Fox News, even Cavuto. Nothing, Nada. I wrote the Swift Boat web site and asked them to bring it up in one of their interviews. Nothing.... I don't get it. If I were a hard hitting news reporter that had a chance to interview Kerry, That would be the first question out of my pie hole. The second, of course would be about signing a "180". The third question, just for grins, would be to ask which 7 Senators he voted to assassinate in the VVAW. I have sent the PDF file of the FBI report that shows he was there at that meeting when they took the vote.
Any ideas on how to get this looked into? Before you know it, he will have a committee looking into his 2008 run. He needs to be squashed yesterday, not 4-8 years from now. He should be impeached for treason, if it turns out he got a dishonarable discharge and Carter gave him a "Get out of the Dumpster" pass.
I can't beleive this guy has made it this long, but hey, it's Mass. They have Kennedy and Fwank also. It must be in the water.
Hope this isn't too far off topic but Al Gore went in the army on a two year enlistment, that means he was unassigned, with no choices or contracts, yet instead of automatically being sent to combat arms, he was given a highly sought journalist slot.
Another thing, he was transferred to Vietnam with only months remaining in his enlistment, well the army didn't work that way.
The army would only send you to a school or Vietnam if it benefited them, they would not invest that money in you just before you were discharged.
"We support those not as smart as John Kerry"- At the Army-Air Force Game
Well, his father was a Senator. He had pull. It was considered de rigeur for a future politician to get some experience in war. So they put him where he would be out of harms way. That's how it's done. No conspiracy there.
I don't think officers get an 'Honorable Discharge'. They 'Resign their Commission'. That time might include Naval Reserve as well.
Officers get Honorable Discharges after resigning their commissions. He may have left active duty in '72 and didn't resign until '78.
John O'Neill addresses these issues in his book "Unfit for Command". It's a great read.
Here is one of those links;
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/000661.htm
Kerry is not just some politician to me. He is right up there with Jane Fonda in my book. Having a traitor in the Senate is tough for me to take. Having him almost be president was a rough time for me. This guy will draw a pension when he finally retires from the Senate unless he is impeached. I'm 55 years old, so I remember things that younger folks don't have a clue about. How can Carter even peek outside after the debacle of his 4 year reign of terror, but today, he's a statesman? Kennedy will go down as an old patriarch of the Senate, instead of the drunken murderer he is.
If nobody takes care of this stuff now, the history books will paint them as hero's. Kerry is no hero.
That is delicious! ; )
I'd say Kerry's "honorable discharge" is about the equivalent of a G.E.D.
Thanks for the link! I remember reading that back in '04. Lots of speculation, huh?
I remain astounded that such a simple matter has never been fully resolved, and that the question has not been asked point blank, or answered in a straightforward manner by that sick, traitorous scumbag John "King of Comedy" Kerry.
Regards,
LH
Two sides of the same coin: The Global Elite
Didn't realize I was writing our President's biography, too. Imagine that. Well, maybe Hosepipe had a point.
Clinton won with 42.7% in 1992
Clinton got 49.2% in 1996 which tore him up because he is doomed to be known forever as never having won by a majority.
Remember those percentages when you hear him described as the political genius of our times.
Bush got 47.9% in 2000 and 50.7% in 2004 which will haunt Clinton for the rest of his life because By defeating Gore in 2000 it repudiated Clinton's "legacy", and Bush broke 50%.
Before Clinton it was Reagan 50.7% in 1980, then Reagan an astounding 58.8% in 1984, then Reagan's legacy vote George H. W. Bush 53.4% in 1988.
"Mother, will you tell me again about how I shall be President one day?"
who's picture is that?
Where did you get that picture of me?
When you're dealing with Kerry and liberals; it's tough connecting the dots.
See what I mean?
I think it's John Kerry as a little boy.
(Actually, I just googled "Little Lord Fauntleroy".)
It is a fascinating and disturbing photo.
It is a photo that you would not want someone to show it to you and ask you to commit to an opinion of the boy.
No matter what you are told as to who, or what the boy is, once he is labeled, you will be able to see it in the photograph.
I agree. I have had that photo bookmarked for some time (mainly to use it to make fun of John Kerry) but I have examined it. I suppose it is a very old photo, and I figure that boy grew old and died long ago. It's a disrurbing contemplation. Heck, the kid could have been some normal shlub whose mother saved up some pennies and took him downtown to a studio, had him dressed up with borrowed clothes for the pose, and then had that photo snapped. Then back to the streets he went with his buddies to get dirty playing stickball and steal apples from somebody's cart.
Or maybe the boy was some aristocrat's son who grew up to run the family's bank.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.