Posted on 11/03/2006 6:44:11 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
NEW YORK (AP) - With the congressional sex scandal still troubling Republicans, one of the United States' top evangelical leaders is now accused of paying for gay sex.
Heading into Tuesday's elections, liberals and some conservatives are saying the Republican party that prides itself on family values has a hypocrisy problem.
Ted Haggard, a staunch foe of same-sex marriage and occasional participant in White House conference calls, resigned as president of the National Association of Evangelicals and head of his Colorado church following allegations he met monthly with a homosexual prostitute for three years. Haggard denies having sex with the man but admits receiving a massage and buying methamphetamine.
Five weeks ago, Republican Congressman Mark Foley - a vocal advocate for exploited children - resigned from Congress because of sexually tinged messages to teenaged male assistants.
(Excerpt) Read more at canada.com ...
Is Haggard Republican? How does the writer know? Last I checked, Haggard wasn't running for office.
Since when are Republicans responsible for straying Evangelicals?
But of course, because we all know the democrats have neither sex scandals nor religious leaders. Well, at least the second (except those that wear turbans).
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus
What was it I just read about Canada?
Oh, that's right...most Canadians think President Bush is more of a threat to the world then Kim Jong-il.
Their beer is overrated as well.
It's a pretty safe assumption...
LMAO, Republican hypocrisy?? This guy isn't a GOP official or a GOP politician. I've never even heard of him before today. This is what this non-story was intended to be, an opportunity for the Clown Car Media to call Republicans "hypocrites" just ahead of the election. This guy is relevent to nothing and has zilch to do with the Republican party.
And even if somehow you want to connect this man to national Republicans, how does one man's hypocrisy make an entire political party hypocritical? The hypocrisy frankly is that of liberals who champion homosexuality in every other instance, but then use it as a weapon when it can be wielded against a political opponent.
I do not know. But, what this article implies is:
All religious leaders MUST be Republican. This means they are admitting that:
1. Only Republicans are religious.
2. Democrats (liberals) are not religious.
Quite an eye opening headline.
I think it was La Rochefoucauld who observed that 'hypocrisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue.'
At least Republicans and Christians who fall into vice are still hypocites. Democrats and secularists have decided that they can call vice 'virtue' and make it so.
Now I see why the MSM is fronting this story.
This is supposed to discourage the simple
minded christians from voting Republican.
Haggard is a global warming advocate I believe. He could very well be a Democrat.
I think this was more about getting the John Kerry story out of the news. So far, it's working pretty well.
I love this. ANY EVANGELICAL = REPUBLICAN.
Jesse Jackson is an "evangelical" Christian (HaHa).
What a biased headline.
There are scandals in both parties, but at least we take our trash out.
That is why Democrats always make a big deal out of stuff like this just before election day. They know we care.
On the other hand, they just keep electing their trash back into office, like Marion Barry, Ted Kennedy, Barney Frank and Alcee Hastings.
By the way, the scuttlebutt is Pelosi is going to put Hastings in as head of the Intelligence committee. An impeached judge in charge of the intelligence committee.
And media bias spotlighted in this article.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.