Detailed Design of Nuclear Weapons is Available on the Internet ( NYT and IAEA Are Liars)

nuclearweaponarchive.org ^ | November 3rd 2006 | jveritas

[jveritas]

The New York Times and the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) claim that the release of some the Iraqi documents contain sensitive nuclear information on how to build and design a nuclear weapons and it is a breach of security. However there is a website called “nuclearweaponarchive.org” http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Nwfaq/Nfaq4.html that details how to engineer and design a nuclear weapons with equations and diagrams and the whole nine yards. Yet another lies by the IAEA and New York Times has been destroyed a lie that was designed to influence the elections on Tuesday.

Here is the website and a list of all chapters on how to design and make the nuclear bomb. If you click on the link it will take you to the chapters and if you click on the chapters you will get extreme details on how to build the nuclear weapon.

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Nwfaq/Nfaq4.html

Section 4.0 Engineering and Design of Nuclear Weapons

Version 2.04: 20 February 1999

4.1 Elements of Fission Weapon Design

• 4.1.1 Dimensional and Temporal Scale Factors • 4.1.2 Nuclear Properties of Fissile Materials • 4.1.3 Distribution of Neutron Flux and Energy in

the Core

• 4.1.4 History of a Fission Explosion • 4.1.5 Fission Weapon Efficiency • 4.1.5.1 Efficiency Equations • 4.1.5.2 Effect of Tampers and Reflectors on

Efficiency

• 4.1.5.3 Predetonation • 4.1.6 Methods of Core Assembly • 4.1.6.1 Gun Assembly • 4.1.6.2 Implosion Assembly • 4.1.6.3 Hybrid Assembly Techniques • 4.1.7 Nuclear Design Principles • 4.1.7.1 Fissionable Materials • 4.1.7.2 Composite Cores • 4.1.7.3 Tampers and Reflectors • 4.1.8 Fission Initiation Techniques • 4.1.9 Testing • 4.2 Fission Weapon Designs • 4.2.1 Low Technology Designs • 4.2.2 High Efficiency Weapons • 4.2.3 Low Yield Weapons • 4.2.4 High Yield Weapons • 4.2.5 Special Purpose Applications • 4.2.6 Weapon Design and Clandestine

Proliferation

• 4.3 Fission-Fusion Hybrid Weapons • 4.3.1 Fusion Boosted Fission Weapons • 4.3.2 Neutron Bombs ("Enhanced Radiation Weapons") • 4.3.3 The Alarm Clock/Layer Cake Design • 4.4 Elements of Thermonuclear Weapon Design • 4.4.1 Development of Thermonuclear Weapon

Concepts

• 4.4.2 Schematic of a Thermonuclear Device • 4.4.3 Radiation Implosion • 4.4.3.1 The Role of Radiation • 4.4.3.2 Opacity of Materials in Thermonuclear

Design

• 4.4.3.3 The Ablation Process • 4.4.3.4 Principles of Compression • 4.4.3.5 Ignition • 4.4.3.6 Burn and Disassembly • 4.4.4 Implosion Systems • 4.4.5 Fusion Stage Nuclear Physics and Design • 4.4.5.1 Fusionable Isotopes • 4.4.5.2 Neutronic Reactions • 4.4.5.3 Fusion Fuels • 4.4.5.4 Fusion Tampers • 4.5 Thermonuclear Weapon Designs • 4.5.1 Principle Design Types • 4.5.2 "Dirty" and "Clean" Weapons • 4.5.3 Maximum Yield/Weight Ratio • 4.5.4 Minimum Residual Radiation (MRR or "Clean") Designs • 4.5.5 Radiological Weapon Designs • 4.6 Weapon System Design • 4.6.1 Weapon Safety • 4.6.2 Variable Yield Designs • 4.6.3 Other Modern Features • 4.7 Speculative Weapon Designs • 4.8 Simulation and Testing

[muawiyah]

The Dems were infiltrated by the terrorists long ago.

[doug from upland]

Maybe he can clear it up next Wednesday while new drapes are being installed in the office of the Speaker and Majority Leader.

[eyespysomething]

Detailed Design of Nuclear Weapons is Available on the Internet ( NYT and IAEA Are Liars)

Release/Translation of Classified PreWar Docs ping. If you want to be added or removed to the ping list, please Freepmail me.

Please add the keyword prewardocs to any articles pertaining to this subject.

Operation Get The Truth Out

Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents

Documents from the Harmony Database. This is not available at this time, but I am hoping it will be again soon.

jveritas’s blog

An Interview With a Citizen Translator and American Hero

[muawiyah]

That's kind of the way I feel about hearing that Shi'ites are slaughtering Sunni terrorists.

Is that a problem?

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Thank you...

[VOA]

Detailed Design of Nuclear Weapons is Available on the Internet ( NYT and IAEA Are Liars)

as an over-user of FR, I'll pass along the advice that makes me
feel about one inch tall when I am the recipient:


Dear NYT and IAEA,
Google is your friend.

[U S Army EOD]

When I was doing some EOD work in New York City in 1971, one of the New York papers published on the front page, detailed instructions on how to make a IED. This IED was very sophisticated and was designed to look like something it wasn't. It was designed with one purpose in mind, which was to kill the first responders, especially the police or EOD team.

[syriacus]

Thanks again for all you do, jveritas.

Are we even sure that detailed bomb-building instructions were posted on the website? Or is the NYT lying, as they often do?

[Danae]

(hug)

Thank you again Joe!

D

[jveritas]

The problem is that website is shut, and I search my downloaded files the website, I did not see the documents that NYT is talking about. I wished I have downloaded these particular documents.

[jazusamo]

People have to be called on to expose the NY Slimes and the IAEA.

Media emails-the formula: if they hear from 40 to 45 people on a story, they will cover it.
CAUTION: do not mass email - they won’t look at it – email singly

Special@foxnews.com (Brit Hume)
e.d.hill@foxnews.com
Hannity@foxnews.com
Oreilly@foxnews.com
Studiob@foxnews.com (Shep Smith)
Myword@foxnews.com (John Gibson)
Drudge@drudgereport.com
writemalkin@gmail.com
hhewitt@hughhewitt.com
rush@eibnet.com
Beltway@foxnews.com (Barnes & Kondracke)
Friends@foxnews.com
captain@captainsquartersblog.com
humanevents@humaneventsonline.com (Ann Coulter)
pundit@instapundit.com
powerlinefeedback@gmail.com
CNN@cnn.com
CNN.onair@cnn.com
joe@msnbc.com
Viewerservices@msnbc.com
Letters@Newsweek.com
Letters@NYT.com
Editor@USAToday.com
Webeditor@Washingtontimes.com
Letterstoed@washpost.com
http://intelligence.senate.gov/ (Senate Intelligence Committee)

[camas]

how about Hazel O'Leary (spelling). back in 1993 she gave the world TS Q intell on how to make a bomb and the Indians and pakis took the data and made bombs. who knows who else used the data. iran iraq

[penelopesire]

"Your winks are very encouraging"

Don't want to leave you with the wrong impression....lol...I am no 'insider'...just a gal that does alot of 'independent' research and that loves to read all the research on Free Republic!!

We all know in our heart of hearts, that the whole WMD screed coming from the left is a pack of lies. We also know that our President did not lie to the American people about Iraq's WMD in order to take us to war.

The weapons were moved!! My guess it that the WH has bigger worries about our troops and our country's safety and they can not open the 'pandorra's box' right now!

[dcrider182]

ping to self

[Bones75]

Being a physics/science fan, I have read extensively the material on that site before.

It is quite interesting, from a science standpoint.

As for non-proliferation.. I think they key to that is the fissile material iteself.. once that is aquired, assembly of a crude device is not difficlut. (Not all that easy, there are some tricks even to the HEU "gun" design, like premature detonation, etc. But I think they key to non-proliferation is the fissile material.. that is the hardest to get a hold of, and that's where it should be stopped.

These designs don't mean a thing if you haven't any Plutonium or U-235, conversely, if you have Pu or U235, you could build a device without these designs.

[penelopesire]

Is Hastert having his office redone? LOL..don't be a pessimist...WE ARE GOING TO WIN THIS THING!!

[jveritas]

Thank you for the info.

[doug from upland]

I'll try, but I really don't like how it looks. For over two years, we were screaming about how the president was allowing the libs to get away with lie after lie. We knew he should have answered immediately and forcefully. It took an incredible toll.

[maryz]

Thanks!

[penelopesire]

"If they had 100% of the equipment but overlooked a single stash filled with the design and engineering work already done that would be meaningless.
It's the intellectual component that's the most important in building a bomb ~ not the parts."

Not going to argue that excellent point, however, WHO CHECKS UP ON THE IAEA? They claimed to have removed equipment and materials that were apparently found in Iraq after the war!!

I would not be a bit surprised if other equipment or materials they have claimed to have removed from other sites around the world was not in their 'lock box' in Vienna!!

Under ElBaradei's 'leadership', way too many of our enemies and potential enemies have made progress on the BOMB!! That is a spectacular resume of failure or subterfuge imho.