Posted on 11/03/2006 2:32:46 PM PST by jveritas
The New York Times and the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) claim that the release of some the Iraqi documents contain sensitive nuclear information on how to build and design a nuclear weapons and it is a breach of security. However there is a website called “nuclearweaponarchive.org” http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Nwfaq/Nfaq4.html that details how to engineer and design a nuclear weapons with equations and diagrams and the whole nine yards. Yet another lies by the IAEA and New York Times has been destroyed a lie that was designed to influence the elections on Tuesday.
Here is the website and a list of all chapters on how to design and make the nuclear bomb. If you click on the link it will take you to the chapters and if you click on the chapters you will get extreme details on how to build the nuclear weapon.
http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Nwfaq/Nfaq4.html
Section 4.0 Engineering and Design of Nuclear Weapons
Version 2.04: 20 February 1999
4.1 Elements of Fission Weapon Design
• 4.1.1 Dimensional and Temporal Scale Factors • 4.1.2 Nuclear Properties of Fissile Materials • 4.1.3 Distribution of Neutron Flux and Energy in
the Core
• 4.1.4 History of a Fission Explosion • 4.1.5 Fission Weapon Efficiency • 4.1.5.1 Efficiency Equations • 4.1.5.2 Effect of Tampers and Reflectors on
Efficiency
• 4.1.5.3 Predetonation • 4.1.6 Methods of Core Assembly • 4.1.6.1 Gun Assembly • 4.1.6.2 Implosion Assembly • 4.1.6.3 Hybrid Assembly Techniques • 4.1.7 Nuclear Design Principles • 4.1.7.1 Fissionable Materials • 4.1.7.2 Composite Cores • 4.1.7.3 Tampers and Reflectors • 4.1.8 Fission Initiation Techniques • 4.1.9 Testing • 4.2 Fission Weapon Designs • 4.2.1 Low Technology Designs • 4.2.2 High Efficiency Weapons • 4.2.3 Low Yield Weapons • 4.2.4 High Yield Weapons • 4.2.5 Special Purpose Applications • 4.2.6 Weapon Design and Clandestine
Proliferation
• 4.3 Fission-Fusion Hybrid Weapons • 4.3.1 Fusion Boosted Fission Weapons • 4.3.2 Neutron Bombs ("Enhanced Radiation Weapons") • 4.3.3 The Alarm Clock/Layer Cake Design • 4.4 Elements of Thermonuclear Weapon Design • 4.4.1 Development of Thermonuclear Weapon
Concepts
• 4.4.2 Schematic of a Thermonuclear Device • 4.4.3 Radiation Implosion • 4.4.3.1 The Role of Radiation • 4.4.3.2 Opacity of Materials in Thermonuclear
Design
• 4.4.3.3 The Ablation Process • 4.4.3.4 Principles of Compression • 4.4.3.5 Ignition • 4.4.3.6 Burn and Disassembly • 4.4.4 Implosion Systems • 4.4.5 Fusion Stage Nuclear Physics and Design • 4.4.5.1 Fusionable Isotopes • 4.4.5.2 Neutronic Reactions • 4.4.5.3 Fusion Fuels • 4.4.5.4 Fusion Tampers • 4.5 Thermonuclear Weapon Designs • 4.5.1 Principle Design Types • 4.5.2 "Dirty" and "Clean" Weapons • 4.5.3 Maximum Yield/Weight Ratio • 4.5.4 Minimum Residual Radiation (MRR or "Clean") Designs • 4.5.5 Radiological Weapon Designs • 4.6 Weapon System Design • 4.6.1 Weapon Safety • 4.6.2 Variable Yield Designs • 4.6.3 Other Modern Features • 4.7 Speculative Weapon Designs • 4.8 Simulation and Testing
Interesting, but I'm guessing they are a waste of your time. Have you contacted the Wash Times, the Weekly Standard, the Christian Science Monitor, or the WSJ?
But, but, but, but there were no nuclear weapons or designs to build them or WMD's in Iraq! Isn't that what the NY slimes has said?
Oh, that's good, maybe he will explain that in tomorrows Times. Fat Chance!
The liar will always get caught and nowadays with the internet the liar will be caught much quicker.
None of these outlets. Should I?
Bump to look at later.
Allah Akbar!
I can't help to think that this may have been a set up to get the Slimes to confirm what we've already known.
It's not the government. It used to be hosted by some scientific organization but is on its own since 2003.
"The president needs to hold a news conference and clear this up right now!"
That would not be wise to do(imho)at this time. If the President went out to address this stuff, it would be giving the NYT & the IAEA more 'recognition' than they deserve or warrant with their silly 'reporting' and subterfuge.
The IAEA has probably been being 'looked at' by the highest levels of our intelligence community for quite some time and in time.....the truth will be revealed.
That's my hope and I'm sticking to it...(wink)
Yes. I'm pinging myself to remind me to get some contact info for you on monday.
Why conservative journalists working for such publications are not freepers and aware of you is inexcusable. LOL
And how do you know that the design from your website is real? Some loon could have made it up.
The Saddam Hussein materials covered a myriad of engineering steps and how the Iraqis solved problems ~ absolutely invaluable stuff.
Just watching the former UN Chief inspector on TV with Russert and he said the stuff shown on the net was stuff he, himself, had seized back in 1991.
Well, that one copy anyway (ha, ha, ha, ha, ha), and he also said it was clear Saddam intended to restart his atom bomb program (using that quite workable design his people had come up with) as soon as the inspection regime was relaxed.
So, whether or not Saddam had yellow cake, he had something far more important ~ a workable design and workable engineering operations layout for a real atom bomb, and he could restart it at any time.
That meant the invasion of Iraq was justifiable on WMD grounds alone.
"I told him about the many other documents that show Saddam was working on re-constructing his nuclear program. He asked me to e-mail him the documents that show this, I did. He replied "interesting"."
What a nimwit.......
What should be interesting to the NYT is all of the things that the IAEA claimed they had rendered 'harmless' in their reports over the years but never did!!
The fact that the IAEA may had been infiltrated by Saddam's spies(according to Rep. Peter Hoekstra)
I'd like an 'accounting' of all the equipment removed from Iraq going back to 1991 that the IAEA claims they have in their possession in Vienna!!???
LONDON, England -- Britain's Ministry of Defence has confirmed it has made public information describing in detail the make-up of a nuclear bomb.The plans give complete cross-sections, precise measurements and full details of materials used for all the components, including the plutonium core and the initiator that sets off the chain reaction causing the blast. [snip]
Retired nuclear engineer Brian Burnell told the UK's Daily Telegraph newspaper that the information on the Blue Danube bomb amounted to step-by-step instructions on how to make a nuclear weapon.
They could have never had WMDs of any kind. Getting rid of Saddam and reshaping the ME is crucial to crushing the jihadis and terrorists. Bush knows that. The Dems do too, except they side with the terrorsists.
It's the intellectual component that's the most important in building a bomb ~ not the parts.
Your winks are very encouraging
They could have never had WMDs of any kind, and it doesn't matter to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.