Detailed Design of Nuclear Weapons is Available on the Internet ( NYT and IAEA Are Liars)

nuclearweaponarchive.org ^ | November 3rd 2006 | jveritas

[pissant]

Interesting, but I'm guessing they are a waste of your time. Have you contacted the Wash Times, the Weekly Standard, the Christian Science Monitor, or the WSJ?

[Road Warrior ‘04]

But, but, but, but there were no nuclear weapons or designs to build them or WMD's in Iraq! Isn't that what the NY slimes has said?

[kempster]

Oh, that's good, maybe he will explain that in tomorrows Times. Fat Chance!

[FreedomProtector]

...had a Physics professor in college (undergraduate) who earned his PhD in nuclear physics (scholarship via air force) I will never forget one day in third semester physics, the topic of a nuclear bomb came up. He draw a conceptual picture of an overview of nuclear bomb. As expected, as curious students of physics, we began asking questions. As details of certain areas of the picture [particularly related to the trigger] were asked about, he would just smile and say, "We can't talk about that part", or "can't discuss that part".


Many parts of a nuclear bomb are public knowledge. Some are not.

An interesting question: Did the Iraq documents contain design descriptions related to the triggering mechanism?

This question is above the knowledge of a Democrat unless they read it on a conservative site first.

[jveritas]

The liar will always get caught and nowadays with the internet the liar will be caught much quicker.

[jveritas]

None of these outlets. Should I?

[Lx]

Bump to look at later.
Allah Akbar!

[tobyhill]

I can't help to think that this may have been a set up to get the Slimes to confirm what we've already known.

[COEXERJ145]

It's not the government. It used to be hosted by some scientific organization but is on its own since 2003.

[penelopesire]

"The president needs to hold a news conference and clear this up right now!"

That would not be wise to do(imho)at this time. If the President went out to address this stuff, it would be giving the NYT & the IAEA more 'recognition' than they deserve or warrant with their silly 'reporting' and subterfuge.

The IAEA has probably been being 'looked at' by the highest levels of our intelligence community for quite some time and in time.....the truth will be revealed.

That's my hope and I'm sticking to it...(wink)

[pissant]

Yes. I'm pinging myself to remind me to get some contact info for you on monday.

Why conservative journalists working for such publications are not freepers and aware of you is inexcusable. LOL

[Jedi Master Pikachu]

And how do you know that the design from your website is real? Some loon could have made it up.

[muawiyah]

One of the compelling aguments, though, is that even with a good theoretical design, there's a lot of engineering work to be done between coming up with the design and coming up with the bomb.

The Saddam Hussein materials covered a myriad of engineering steps and how the Iraqis solved problems ~ absolutely invaluable stuff.

Just watching the former UN Chief inspector on TV with Russert and he said the stuff shown on the net was stuff he, himself, had seized back in 1991.

Well, that one copy anyway (ha, ha, ha, ha, ha), and he also said it was clear Saddam intended to restart his atom bomb program (using that quite workable design his people had come up with) as soon as the inspection regime was relaxed.

So, whether or not Saddam had yellow cake, he had something far more important ~ a workable design and workable engineering operations layout for a real atom bomb, and he could restart it at any time.

That meant the invasion of Iraq was justifiable on WMD grounds alone.

[crazyhorse691]

bookmark for later reading(the thread, not necessarily the how-to big boom primer)

[penelopesire]

"I told him about the many other documents that show Saddam was working on re-constructing his nuclear program. He asked me to e-mail him the documents that show this, I did. He replied "interesting"."

What a nimwit.......


What should be interesting to the NYT is all of the things that the IAEA claimed they had rendered 'harmless' in their reports over the years but never did!!

The fact that the IAEA may had been infiltrated by Saddam's spies(according to Rep. Peter Hoekstra)

I'd like an 'accounting' of all the equipment removed from Iraq going back to 1991 that the IAEA claims they have in their possession in Vienna!!???

[syriacus]

UK reveals [complete] nuclear bomb plans April 15, 2002

LONDON, England -- Britain's Ministry of Defence has confirmed it has made public information describing in detail the make-up of a nuclear bomb.

The plans give complete cross-sections, precise measurements and full details of materials used for all the components, including the plutonium core and the initiator that sets off the chain reaction causing the blast. [snip]

Retired nuclear engineer Brian Burnell told the UK's Daily Telegraph newspaper that the information on the Blue Danube bomb amounted to step-by-step instructions on how to make a nuclear weapon.

[pissant]

They could have never had WMDs of any kind. Getting rid of Saddam and reshaping the ME is crucial to crushing the jihadis and terrorists. Bush knows that. The Dems do too, except they side with the terrorsists.

[muawiyah]

If they had 100% of the equipment but overlooked a single stash filled with the design and engineering work already done that would be meaningless.

It's the intellectual component that's the most important in building a bomb ~ not the parts.

[syriacus]

.the truth will be revealed.

Your winks are very encouraging

[pissant]

My 1st sentence should have read:

They could have never had WMDs of any kind, and it doesn't matter to me.