Posted on 11/02/2006 8:48:45 PM PST by jveritas
Edited on 11/02/2006 11:06:31 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
The New York Times article to be published on November 3rd 2006 is about the US putting some captured Iraqi documents on the Foreign Military Intelligence Office (FMSO) website that talks about what the NYT and the IAEA call sensitive information from Iraq 1996 "Full, Final, and Complete Declaration FFCD presented to the UN and IAEA in 1996 and that talks about Iraq nuclear clandestine program. The IAEA and the New York Times claim that Iran may be using some of the technology in this FFCD which is a laughable idea as shown below.
That is from the IAEA website regardinf their report on Iraq FFCD presented to them by the Iraqis in 1996: 3. On 7 September 1996 in Baghdad Iraq delivered what it considered to be the definitive version of the "Full, Final, and Complete Declaration" (FFCD-F) of the Iraqi clandestine nuclear programme. The IAEA with the assistance of technical experts from Member States undertook a comprehensive review of the document. Link: http://www.iaea.org/About/Policy/GC/GC41/Documents/gc41-20.html
So the FFCD was discussed with member states experts of the IAEA. There are 142 members in the IAEA including Iran. I am not saying that the IAEA discussed the Iraqi FFCD with Iranians but the FFCD was not such a secret document and the Iranians would have been able to access it in one way or another if it really provide them with any useful information.
What is important in this whole issue is that the New York Times has ridiculed these documents all along and never payed attention to them including the very important documents that show Saddam regime never stopped its programs related to WMD including nuclear programs. These documents were translated and posted here on FR.
On the subject of nuclear program, I translated and posted a document last month dated January 2001 that shows with a shadow of doubt that Saddam was personally involved with his nuclear scientist to re-build the nuclear program. In this document it states that Saddam personally approved his Iraqi Atomic Energy Agency to re-use nuclear equipments that include something called Degussa Furnaces that were used in the previous and prohibited Iraq nuclear program. These furnaces can be used to melt uranium and other nuclear related activities. The Degussa Vacuum furnaces were supplied to Iraq in the 1980s by a German firm (Degussa AG based in Frankfurt Germany) and these furnaces later on became the subject of investigations of the German firm in the early 1990s where the company claimed that they did not know that Iraq would have used them in its nuclear program.
The New York Times had an article in 1998 titled An Iraqi Defector Warns of Iraq's Nuclear Weapons Research where the Degussa furnaces were mentioned as part of previous Iraq nuclear program and the controversy surrounding the sale of these furnaces and the investigations later on(link: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~sanders/214/other/news/iraqi_defector.html ). The irony is that this is not only a New York Times article but also it was written by JUDITH MILLER and JAMES RISEN once of the worst accusers (liars) that the Bush administration lied about Iraq WMD. Where are you Scott Shane????
Link to the translated document on FR: 2001 Iraqi Document: Saddam Approved the Re-Use of Nuclear Equipment http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1725141/posts
Moreover, there are documents dated 1999-2001 that talk about Saddam regime projects to re-build some of the nuclear program facilities like RWTS (Radioactive Waste Treatment Station) and Radio-Chemistry laboratories which were part of Iraq previous clandestine nuclear program. Link to the translated document on FR: Iraqi Documents: Projects to Rebuild Saddam Nuclear Facilities http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1718125/posts .
Also this one
Iraqi Documents Show Plans for Prohibited Nuclear Projects http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1709390/posts
And why worry about Tehran anyways? The UN says that there is no evidence that they want to build nukes anyways. I'm sure it won't be a problem until there is another GOP president.
I've read every thread you've posted on FR regarding the translations.
I hope you understand you are about to come under intense scrutiny, it might be time to acquire the services of a p.r. flack to handle what will be a huge issue the week before a midterm election.
If you have just shredded the NYTimes as thoroughly as you appear to have, you need to not just passively post to the internet your translations, analysis and commentary, but actively push your message into national media newscycles to guarantee your work finds the exposure it so needs.
As you've said, FR is the best forum on the net, and for the last year this is very much because of your contributions, now find a way to spread your words far and wide.
I sent it to Laura Ingraham & Michael Medved, so they both have a heads-up in the morning!
HUGE PING!!!
Intelligent Freepers like yourself have made print news & the MSM irrelivant! Soon, print news & TV news will be extinct!! What super smart Freepers we have!!!
Just sent it off to everyone in my email.
I am going to be posting related links on this thread as I find them in the wee hours.
RECAP and UPDATE:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=prewardocs
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=iraq
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1730468/posts?page=102#102
===
===
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1731252/posts
"Shocker: New York Times Confirms Iraqi Nuclear Weapons Program"
NRO ^ | Jim Geraghty
Posted on 11/02/2006 8:09:04 PM PST by hipaatwo
===
===
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1731246/posts
"Saddam Closer To Bomb Than Anyone Thought"
Stop The ACLU ^ | 3-Nov-06 | John Stephenson
Posted on 11/02/2006 7:49:13 PM PST by Jay777
===
===
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1731249/posts
"U.S. Web Archive Is Said to Reveal a Nuclear Guide (Saddam Hussein had a nuclear weapons program)"
NYT ^ | November 3, 2006 | William J. Broad
Posted on 11/02/2006 8:01:04 PM PST by RDTF
must read ping
The Dems and media will try to spin this hard.
But the bottom line is Bush was right about Saddam!
Great job FReeper buddy!
I just sent you a FReepmail that might help make this more followable for those not familar with this subject matter. Let me know what you think.
I've hit several blogs with this article, it's going to be everywhere by daybreak! LOL
bookmark for later
Pinging your outstanding emails contact list
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.