Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JVERITAS Responds to the 11/3 NYT Article Regarding Iraq Nuclear Program.
November 3rd 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 11/02/2006 8:48:45 PM PST by jveritas

Edited on 11/02/2006 11:06:31 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

The New York Times article to be published on November 3rd 2006 is about the US putting some captured Iraqi documents on the Foreign Military Intelligence Office (FMSO) website that talks about what the NYT and the IAEA call sensitive information from Iraq 1996 "Full, Final, and Complete Declaration FFCD presented to the UN and IAEA in 1996 and that talks about Iraq nuclear clandestine program. The IAEA and the New York Times claim that Iran may be using some of the technology in this FFCD which is a laughable idea as shown below.

That is from the IAEA website regardinf their report on Iraq FFCD presented to them by the Iraqis in 1996: “ 3. On 7 September 1996 in Baghdad Iraq delivered what it considered to be the definitive version of the "Full, Final, and Complete Declaration" (FFCD-F) of the Iraqi clandestine nuclear programme. The IAEA with the assistance of technical experts from Member States undertook a comprehensive review of the document.” Link: http://www.iaea.org/About/Policy/GC/GC41/Documents/gc41-20.html

So the FFCD was discussed with member states experts of the IAEA. There are 142 members in the IAEA including Iran. I am not saying that the IAEA discussed the Iraqi FFCD with Iranians but the FFCD was not such a secret document and the Iranians would have been able to access it in one way or another if it really provide them with any useful information.

What is important in this whole issue is that the New York Times has ridiculed these documents all along and never payed attention to them including the very important documents that show Saddam regime never stopped its programs related to WMD including nuclear programs. These documents were translated and posted here on FR.

On the subject of nuclear program, I translated and posted a document last month dated January 2001 that shows with a shadow of doubt that Saddam was personally involved with his nuclear scientist to re-build the nuclear program. In this document it states that Saddam personally approved his Iraqi Atomic Energy Agency to re-use nuclear equipments that include something called “Degussa Furnaces” that were used in the previous and prohibited Iraq nuclear program. These furnaces can be used to melt uranium and other nuclear related activities. The Degussa Vacuum furnaces were supplied to Iraq in the 1980’s by a German firm (Degussa AG based in Frankfurt Germany) and these furnaces later on became the subject of investigations of the German firm in the early 1990’s where the company claimed that they did not know that Iraq would have used them in its nuclear program.

The New York Times had an article in 1998 titled “An Iraqi Defector Warns of Iraq's Nuclear Weapons Research” where the Degussa furnaces were mentioned as part of “previous” Iraq nuclear program and the controversy surrounding the sale of these furnaces and the investigations later on(link: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~sanders/214/other/news/iraqi_defector.html ). The irony is that this is not only a New York Times article but also it was written by JUDITH MILLER and JAMES RISEN once of the worst accusers (liars) that the Bush administration lied about Iraq WMD. Where are you Scott Shane????

Link to the translated document on FR: 2001 Iraqi Document: Saddam Approved the Re-Use of Nuclear Equipment http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1725141/posts

Moreover, there are documents dated 1999-2001 that talk about Saddam regime projects to re-build some of the nuclear program facilities like RWTS (Radioactive Waste Treatment Station) and Radio-Chemistry laboratories which were part of Iraq previous clandestine nuclear program. Link to the translated document on FR: Iraqi Documents: Projects to Rebuild Saddam Nuclear Facilities http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1718125/posts .

Also this one

Iraqi Documents Show Plans for Prohibited Nuclear Projects http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1709390/posts


TOPICS: Breaking News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 19992001; 2001documents; atomicbomb; degussa; degussafurnaces; enemedia; fmsodocuments; gwbvindicated; iraq; jveritas; mediabbias; newyorktimessucks; notbreakingnews; nuclear; nuclearbomb; nuketheleft; nyt; onfreep; pajamahuddein; pajamapeoplerule; prewardocs; saddam; saddamdocs; saddamnuke; saddamnukes; waronerror; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 501-512 next last
To: CyberAnt
Because they know how far off the data IS.

They and the Dims behind them are in the midst of a very well orchestrated attempt to keep the GOP voter at home, its literally their ONLY prayer of winning. This is a last ditch attempt to disillusion that GOP voter just that much more to keep him/her home.

Only problem is that they shot themselves in the head, they just gave credence to documents that PROVE the Bush administration RIGHT in going to war in Iraq. Yea, some stuff that should not have been on the Internet got up there, but lets be honest, its NOTHING that countries attempting to produce Nuclear weapons don't ALREADY know! The point is: the NYT spent the last several years DISMISSING the documents THEY NOW SITE IN AN ATTEMPT TO SMEAR THE ADMINISTRATION AND THE GOP WITH 5 DAYS BEFORE THE ELECTION! They just made ALL of them CREDIBLE!!!! That's how I define Panic. If they had given it a moments thought, they would NEVER have published that story unless 1) they are REALLY stupid (granted that's possible) or 2) because they DESPERATELY believed it NECESSARY to publish it in order to sway the election, given they KNOW how squed the numbers are, they KNOW they need something to tip em over.... Bingo. Publish it in the hopes no one GET'S it. Oops, we GET it Dims, a whole lot better than you, which is WHY you should NEVER be allowed to hold power again. Yea we get it. More importantly, so did President Bush in sending the U.S. into War!
281 posted on 11/03/2006 12:02:48 AM PST by Danae (Anál nathrach, orth' bháis's bethad, do chél dénmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Either Saddam HAD NO WMD or NUKE PROGRAM or we managed to leak his program to Tehran?? Which is it gonna be MSM???? Are we about to get a confession from Howard Dean, Katie Couric, John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Hans Blix, Dan Rather and the rest of the 'Bush Lied' crowd that there really was an Iraqi nucular program ongoing when we went into Iraq???

And why worry about Tehran anyways? The UN says that there is no evidence that they want to build nukes anyways. I'm sure it won't be a problem until there is another GOP president.

282 posted on 11/03/2006 12:03:25 AM PST by bpjam (Not Voting in '06? Turn in your VRWC card at exit quietly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

I've read every thread you've posted on FR regarding the translations.

I hope you understand you are about to come under intense scrutiny, it might be time to acquire the services of a p.r. flack to handle what will be a huge issue the week before a midterm election.

If you have just shredded the NYTimes as thoroughly as you appear to have, you need to not just passively post to the internet your translations, analysis and commentary, but actively push your message into national media newscycles to guarantee your work finds the exposure it so needs.

As you've said, FR is the best forum on the net, and for the last year this is very much because of your contributions, now find a way to spread your words far and wide.


283 posted on 11/03/2006 12:13:56 AM PST by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma

I sent it to Laura Ingraham & Michael Medved, so they both have a heads-up in the morning!


284 posted on 11/03/2006 12:26:13 AM PST by blondee123 (Politicians are like diapers, need to be changed often & for the same reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Repub4bush; holdonnow

HUGE PING!!!


285 posted on 11/03/2006 12:32:47 AM PST by blondee123 (Politicians are like diapers, need to be changed often & for the same reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; Jim Robinson
US reveals Iraq nuclear operation

click the link

The US has revealed that it removed more than 1.7 metric tons of radioactive material from Iraq in a secret operation last month.

Note: This article is from July 7, 2004

286 posted on 11/03/2006 12:38:30 AM PST by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Thanks for the ping BUMP!

:)


287 posted on 11/03/2006 12:40:39 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Karl Rove you magnificent bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Intelligent Freepers like yourself have made print news & the MSM irrelivant! Soon, print news & TV news will be extinct!! What super smart Freepers we have!!!


288 posted on 11/03/2006 12:44:23 AM PST by blondee123 (Politicians are like diapers, need to be changed often & for the same reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
BUMP! BUMP! BUMP! BUMP! BUMP! BUMP! BUMP!

(echoing into the bottomless MSM)

289 posted on 11/03/2006 12:48:40 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
E-MAIL Saturate the internet by morning.

Just sent it off to everyone in my email.

290 posted on 11/03/2006 12:49:34 AM PST by blondee123 (Politicians are like diapers, need to be changed often & for the same reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; All

I am going to be posting related links on this thread as I find them in the wee hours.

RECAP and UPDATE:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=prewardocs

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=iraq


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1730468/posts?page=102#102

===
===

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1731252/posts

"Shocker: New York Times Confirms Iraqi Nuclear Weapons Program"
NRO ^ | Jim Geraghty

Posted on 11/02/2006 8:09:04 PM PST by hipaatwo

===
===

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1731246/posts

"Saddam Closer To Bomb Than Anyone Thought"
Stop The ACLU ^ | 3-Nov-06 | John Stephenson

Posted on 11/02/2006 7:49:13 PM PST by Jay777

===
===

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1731249/posts

"U.S. Web Archive Is Said to Reveal a Nuclear Guide (Saddam Hussein had a nuclear weapons program)"
NYT ^ | November 3, 2006 | William J. Broad

Posted on 11/02/2006 8:01:04 PM PST by RDTF


291 posted on 11/03/2006 12:50:13 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; stowaway; jjm2111; Mrs.LoneGOPinCT; underbyte; badbackman; Bigfitz; mcswan; posterkid; ...

must read ping


292 posted on 11/03/2006 12:53:47 AM PST by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Excellent work, as always!

The Dems and media will try to spin this hard.

But the bottom line is Bush was right about Saddam!

293 posted on 11/03/2006 12:54:17 AM PST by airborne (If Democrats win in November, America will suffer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Great job FReeper buddy!

I just sent you a FReepmail that might help make this more followable for those not familar with this subject matter. Let me know what you think.


294 posted on 11/03/2006 12:57:17 AM PST by Yossarian (Everyday, somewhere on the globe, somebody is pushing the frontier of stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon; jveritas
'jveritas' -Freeper Of The Year!


295 posted on 11/03/2006 12:58:49 AM PST by airborne (If Democrats win in November, America will suffer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

I've hit several blogs with this article, it's going to be everywhere by daybreak! LOL


296 posted on 11/03/2006 12:58:56 AM PST by blondee123 (Politicians are like diapers, need to be changed often & for the same reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

bookmark for later


297 posted on 11/03/2006 12:59:47 AM PST by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Thanks jv, excellent as always...

I referenced this in a Digg post here...
298 posted on 11/03/2006 1:08:02 AM PST by EasySt (Life is Precious, Live it Well...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Investigative journalism as it should be. Nicely done.
299 posted on 11/03/2006 1:19:47 AM PST by WorkerbeeCitizen (Religion of peace my arse - We need a maintenance Crusade - piss on Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Pinging your outstanding emails contact list


300 posted on 11/03/2006 2:38:18 AM PST by Toadman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 501-512 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson