Posted on 11/02/2006 7:49:13 PM PST by Jay777
The New Yorks times confirms that in 2002 Saddam Hussein's "scientists were on the verge of building an atom bomb, as little as a year away:"
Among the dozens of documents in English were Iraqi reports written in the 1990s and in 2002 for United Nations inspectors in charge of making sure Iraq abandoned its unconventional arms programs after the Persian Gulf war. Experts say that at the time, Mr. Husseins scientists were on the verge of building an atom bomb, as little as a year away.
Had the United States not eliminated this threat, today we would be facing a nuclear armed Iraq and possibly a nuclear armed Iran.
The Blogs React!
(Excerpt) Read more at stoptheaclu.com ...
Fortunately I don't mind screaming.
Treason Media has not reported at all on the FACT that Saddam's nuclear program was subcontracted to Libya. Isn't it odd that it has had NO interest in that very interesting FACT?
I can't imagine why.
It's also interesting that conservatives aren't screaming it til the cows come home. I wonder why.
Oh barf! I have to admit I'm not surprised either... :-(
Oh boy, let's bring Joe Wilson back into this!
Could the continued and seriously falling stock price finally caught up with the NYT brass and they are going to change teams?
The Slimes thinks they can claim that the administration's translation of these documents (and specifically, their posting them on a website) helped Iran get their bomb research on the righ track. I don't see it working. It's a big leap to figure they needed the help or got anything from the docs that wasn't already on the Internet. I think this will blow up in their faces the way the wiretap and finance tracking stories did, and it will end up functioning as a November Surprise that favors us.
Great!
Just by reading the headlines....Im glad Bush took him out if this is true.
LOVE YA DUBYA....SUPPORT THE TROOPS
JVERITAS Responds to the 11/3 NYT Article Regarding Iraq Nuclear Program.
--It seems like they were referring to the early 1990's was when he was close to having nukes.--
The liberals at the time were chanting 'no blood for oil!' in the streets and OPPOSING Gulf War 1. Among them was John F. Kerry.
Without Gulf War 1, Saddam indeed WOULD have developed a nuke, with which to blackmail the Saudis, Iranians, and choke off the world's oil supply.
I guess the dems will have to eat their words
http://www.cafenetamerica.com
Hmmmmmm...........hope you enjoyed your VERY short stay on FR.
bttt
But! BUT! BUT!!! BUT Iraq didn't have any WMD!!! What the!!! HAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!! :) Boy confirmation that Iraq had a nuke weapons program in 2002 and 2003, and unemployment down to 4.4% with 92,000 jobs added, and something big to break on the Rush thread today, this is a BAD day to be a liberetard Democrat!!! :) The Democrats will lose seats in the House and Senate. I've said it for months and I believe it even more now.
Senator Santorum Comments on Release of Valuable Information in Pre-War Documents Discovered in Iraq
U.S. Web Archive Is Said to Reveal a Nuclear Guide (Saddam Hussein had a nuclear weapons program)
Saddam Closer To Bomb Than Anyone Thought
Shocker: New York Times Confirms Iraqi Nuclear Weapons Program
JVERITAS Responds to the 11/3 NYT Article Regarding Iraq Nuclear Program.
The New York Times Strikes (Out) Again
Senator Santorum Comments on Release of Valuable Information in Pre-War Documents Discovered in Iraq
U.S. Web Archive Is Said to Reveal a Nuclear Guide (Saddam Hussein had a nuclear weapons program)
Shocker: New York Times Confirms Iraqi Nuclear Weapons Program
JVERITAS Responds to the 11/3 NYT Article Regarding Iraq Nuclear Program.
Iran - CIA 'gave bomb plan to Tehran' (Clinton Legacy - Nuclear weapons)
Iran - CIA 'gave bomb plan to Tehran' (Clinton Legacy - Nuclear weapons)
We have been screaming for years to no avail.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.