Ancient human virus resurrected

news@nature.com ^ | 31 October 2006 | Helen Pearson

[neverdem]

Close window

Published online: 31 October 2006; | doi:10.1038/news061030-4

Ancient human virus resurrected

Virus from distant past may throw light on role of retroviruses in cancer.

Helen Pearson

Retroviruses, of which HIV is a modern example, infiltrated our genome long ago. RUSSELL KIGHTLEY / SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY

Researchers in France have recreated a 5-million-year-old virus whose remains are now found littered across the human genome. The ancient virus could help us to understand how these genetic remnants contribute to cancer.

The virus is of a type called a retrovirus, which can insert copies of its genetic material into our own DNA. These viruses probably infected eggs and sperm of our primate ancestors many millions of years ago, and pasted numerous copies of their genetic material into the genome. The relics of these copies in human DNA are called human endogenous retroviruses, or HERVs.

Today, copies of HERVs make up some 8% of our genetic code. But these copies have racked up mutations and are largely obsolete: scientists have never found one that can still convert itself into new, infectious virus particles.

Now Thierry Heidmann at the Gustav Roussy Institute in Villejuif and his colleagues, have brought one of these retroviruses back to life. They call it Phoenix, for the mythical bird reborn from its own ashes.

"It's a Jurassic Park kind of experiment to resurrect an old virus," says John Coffin who studies retroviruses at Tufts University in Boston, Massachusetts. "It's just kind of cool."

Rising from the ashes

Heidmann's team focused on a particular type of retrovirus that infected human cells less than 5 million years ago and left a legacy of some 30 copies of itself in the modern human genome. These duplicates have all become slightly different over time as they acquired various mutations. By comparing them, the researchers worked out the most likely sequence of the original virus from which they were copied.

The team then used the DNA of two existing HERVs as a backbone and engineered specific mutations into it, to build a duplicate of the original Pheonix. They inserted it into human cells to see what it would do.

It's a Jurassic Park kind of experiment to resurrect an old virus  John Coffin, Tufts University.

The ancestral virus was able to copy itself and manufacture new virus particles, they found. And these particles could infect fresh cells and copy and paste its genes into these cells' genome.

The study suggests that cells acquired numerous copies of this ancestral retrovirus by the same cyclical process: the retrovirus manufactured new particles that escaped one cell and infected eggs and sperm again and again. This may have still been happening just a few hundred thousand years ago.

Dangerous infection

The team also found hints that some of the HERVs in our genomes might still be infectious. They spliced together parts of three HERVs — a process that could occur spontaneously in a cell — and found that they could also produce infectious viruses. Heidmann says that the human genome may even harbour as-yet undiscovered HERVs that are naturally infectious.

The ancient virus might help us understand whether and how retroviruses contribute to cancer, Coffin says. Researchers have found that cells of certain tumours contain retroviral proteins or whole viruses, as if a HERV has reactivated. Armed with the active virus, they'll be able to test whether infection actually accelerates the disease.

The resurrection of an ancient, infectious virus is also likely to raise concerns, which Heidmann acknowledges. Last year, resurrection of the 1918 pandemic flu virus prompted fears about the virus's escape (see 'The 1918 flu virus is resurrected').

Heidmann points out that the retrovirus is around 1,000 times less infectious than the famous HIV retrovirus. The group also engineered the virus so that it can only copy itself once and cannot proliferate out of control. "It's not impossible that it could turn out to be a pathogen but I think it's very unlikely," agrees Coffin.

Visit our newsblog to read and post comments about this story.

	Top

References

1. Dewannieux M., et al. Genome Research, published online (2006) DOI: 10.1101/gr.5565706.

	Top

Story from news@nature.com:
http://news.nature.com//news/2006/061030/061030-4.html

		© 2006 Nature Publishing Group | Privacy policy

[oneamericanvoice]

Well, now the French find something else that they're good at besides wine and surrender, and what is it? A virus!

"Just because they could, doesn't mean they should". Jurrasic Park

[metmom]

Jurassic Park? More like The Andromeda Strain. Neither one a pleasant scenario. I worry when scientists start messing with stuff like that.

[El Sordo]

Innerestin'

[ozoneliar]

I worry when scientists start messing with stuff like that.

Me too. Imagine a ancient Super-virus kills millions.

[ndt]

I realize that a virus litteraly embedded in our DNA is likely one we have developed an immunity to, but I still have to wonder if this is a smart thing to do.

[cardinal4]

How cool! Im study DNA and genetic engineering in school as we speak..

[D-fendr]

It's actually quite beautiful.

[The_Reader_David]

So, is the pasting of genetic code by viruses into a genome Lamarkian or Darwinian evolution?

[chadwimc]

Can we make a designer virus that only attacks moslems???

[Stallone]

Bioweapons.

I wonder if it could be programmed to target only a particularly violent race of people.

[Stallone]

Only by minutes!

[metmom]

Researchers in France have recreated a 5-million-year-old virus whose remains are now found littered across the human genome.

It's that distinction that concerns me. *remains* are not the same thing as the whole virus. Even so, who knows at what expense that immunity came.

[patton]

No, there is no indication that we would have developed an immunity to it.

None at all.

[metmom]

ping

[W. W. SMITH]

OK....... Now find out how to flush out all remnants of the virus and then see what happens.

[ndt]

"Can we make a designer virus that only attacks moslems???"

Probably not Dr. Mengele. Aren't you a laugh riot with your genocide jokes yuk yuk.

[little jeremiah]

It's funny how many articles you ping me to that I was trying to avoid!

:-)

Will take a look tomorrow, had a hard day today.

[isom35]

how about just liberals then?

[Billthedrill]

This is a mechanism for mutation, not an argument, IMHO, for any overall model of origin of species. I don't think it supports Lamarkianism at all as I understand that - for that to happen the host would have to find a mechanism for expressing an acquired charactistic within a changed genome, a process yet to be shown, or even less probably the virus would have to somehow translate an acquired characteristic in the host to its own genome and pass it on, a mechanism for that being entirely un-hypothesized in science at least as far as I can tell.

It might explain a faster rate of mutation than other models that do not incorporate that as a mechanism. We've already seen the evolutionary models for bacteria sped up by the understanding of bacteriophages. But it doesn't really support Darwinian models or ID or pure creationism per se. Doesn't dictate against them either. I offer this tentatively in the hopes that this doesn't turn into another vituperative crevo thread. The topic deserves greater respect than that, IMHO.