Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britons 'could be microchipped like dogs in a decade' (Not good, not good at all!)
Daily Mail ^ | 30th October 2006 | DAN NEWLING

Posted on 11/01/2006 5:05:35 AM PST by SheLion

Human beings may be forced to be 'microchipped' like pet dogs, a shocking official report into the rise of the Big Brother state has warned.

The microchips - which are implanted under the skin - allow the wearer's movements to be tracked and store personal information about them.

They could be used by companies who want to keep tabs on an employee's movements or by Governments who want a foolproof way of identifying their citizens - and storing information about them.

The prospect of 'chip-citizens' -
with its terrifying echoes of George Orwell's 'Big Brother' police state in the book 1984 - was raised in an official report for Britain's Information Commissioner Richard Thomas into the spread of surveillance technology.

The report, drawn up by a team of respected academics, claims that Britain is a world-leader in the use of surveillance technology and its citizens the most spied-upon in the free world.

It paints a frightening picture of what Britain might be like in ten years time unless steps are taken to regulate the use of CCTV and other spy technologies.

The reports editors Dr David Murakami Wood, managing editor of the journal Surveillance and Society and Dr Kirstie Ball, an Open University lecturer in Organisation Studies, claim that by 2016 our almost every movement, purchase and communication could be monitored by a complex network of interlinking surveillance technologies.

The most contentious prediction is the spread in the use of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology.

The RFID chips - which can be detected and read by radio waves - are already used in new UK passports and are also used the Oyster card system to access the London Transport network.

For the past six years European countries have been using RFID chips to identify pet animals.

Already used in America

However, its use in humans has already been trialled in America,
where the chips were implanted in 70 mentally-ill elderly people in order to track their movements.

And earlier this year a security company in Ohio chipped two of its employees to allow them to enter a secure area. The glass-encased chips were planted in the recipients' upper right arms and 'read' by a device similar to a credit card reader.

In their Report on the Surveillance Society, the authors now warn: "The call for everyone to be implanted is now being seriously debated."

The authors also highlight the Government's huge enthusiasm for CCTV, pointing out that during the 1990s the Home Office spent 78 per cent of its crime prevention budget - a total of £500 million - on installing the cameras.

There are now 4.2 million CCTV cameras in Britain and the average Briton is caught on camera an astonishing 300 times every day.

This huge enthusiasm comes despite official Home Office statistics showing that CCTV cameras have 'little effect on crime levels'.

They write: "The surveillance society has come about us without us realising", adding: "Some of it is essential for providing the services we need: health, benefits, education. Some of it is more questionable. Some of it may be unjustified, intrusive and oppressive."

Yesterday Information Commissioner Richard Thomas, whose office is investigating the Post Office, HSBC, NatWest and the Royal Bank of Scotland over claims they dumped sensitive customer details in the street, said: "Many of these schemes are public sector driven, and the individual has no choice over whether or not to take part."

"People are being scrutinised and having their lives tracked, and are not even aware of it."

He has also voiced his concern about the consequences of companies, or Government agencies, building up too much personal information about someone.

He said: "It can stigmatise people. I have worries about technology being used to identify classes of people who present some kind of risk to society. And I think there are real anxieties about that."

Yesterday a spokesman for civil liberties campaigners Liberty said: "We have got nothing about these surveillance technologies in themselves, but it is their potential uses about which there are legitimate fears. Unless their uses are regulated properly, people really could find themselves living in a surveillance society.

"There is a rather scary underlying feeling that people may worry that these microchips are less about being a human being than becoming a barcoded product."



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Rb ver. 2.0; SheLion

That's all? Something posted on a chat board?


21 posted on 11/01/2006 5:40:04 AM PST by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

That's why, I believe, Brit's technically are "subjects" and not citizens.....


22 posted on 11/01/2006 5:41:29 AM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

sorry forgot the link I found:

http://www.av1611.org/666/barcode.html

Like I said, grain of salt.


23 posted on 11/01/2006 5:41:53 AM PST by Rb ver. 2.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Talking about dogs, when do the French start getting microchipped by the Muslims?


24 posted on 11/01/2006 5:44:16 AM PST by urroner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Hmmm....be chipped or convert to Islam. Decisions, decisions! ;)


25 posted on 11/01/2006 5:46:23 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ElectricStrawberry
Sounds like a great idea..........for Alzheimer's patients and politicians.

There. That's better.

26 posted on 11/01/2006 5:48:24 AM PST by Sarajevo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0

Ronald Wilson Reagan = 6 6 6 to the loonies, too!


27 posted on 11/01/2006 5:48:33 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
There is a value here and also a danger. Wouldn't the main issue be just how much info was on the chip. Also the danger of a spyware element besides the conspiracy stuff. You wouldn't want anyone to know how many times you went in and out of Wal-mart. We have a dog who likes to run and he has a chip because he looks just like every other golden retriever. For people who have issues and medical issues this could be very important, abducted children who had a chip could be found the first time they went to a doctor etc. but yes this is also a danger.
28 posted on 11/01/2006 5:52:40 AM PST by badpacifist (I want you, I need you. But there ain't no way I'm ever gonna love you. So don't be sad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

"It'll never fly here...unless they call it the PATRIOT chip."

I think you caught the essence of our problem.


29 posted on 11/01/2006 6:03:39 AM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

I am sure the proles in Airstrip One are doubleplusunhappy at this prospect.


30 posted on 11/01/2006 6:24:13 AM PST by akorahil (Thank You and God bless all Veterans. Truly, the real heroes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verity
Better start stockpiling those cigarettes. LMAO

Well, in all actuality, cigarettes would be the least of my problems during a time like that.

31 posted on 11/01/2006 7:19:17 AM PST by SheLion (When you're right, take up the fight!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jasoncann
that's actually not true, I have a book on my desk whose barcode contains only one 6 and it's smack dab in the middle.

Well, like I answered another poster earlier, a person wrote that in under the actual article.  Personally, I know very little about bar codes at this time.

32 posted on 11/01/2006 7:21:46 AM PST by SheLion (When you're right, take up the fight!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner; Rb ver. 2.0
That's all? Something posted on a chat board?

The actual article has a place for reader's comments.  Didn't you read the article itself?

33 posted on 11/01/2006 7:23:32 AM PST by SheLion (When you're right, take up the fight!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

That's a chatboard.


34 posted on 11/01/2006 7:24:59 AM PST by Rb ver. 2.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mo
That's why, I believe, Brit's technically are "subjects" and not citizens.....

Did you read where two government workers in Ohio had the chip implanted already?

35 posted on 11/01/2006 7:25:02 AM PST by SheLion (When you're right, take up the fight!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0
That's a chatboard.

The article provides a chat board for reader's opinions on this subject.

Britons 'could be microchipped like dogs in a decade'

by DAN NEWLING Last updated at 00:11am on 30th October 2006

Comments Reader comments (37)

36 posted on 11/01/2006 7:28:21 AM PST by SheLion (When you're right, take up the fight!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: KoRn; Abram; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; Americanwolf; ...
See comment 3. :)





Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
37 posted on 11/01/2006 7:52:10 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Amnesty_From_Government.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Britons will be muslim in a decade

No we won't.

38 posted on 11/01/2006 11:12:27 AM PST by Da_Shrimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Thanks for the ping!


39 posted on 11/01/2006 9:59:32 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

"It'll never fly here...unless they call it the PATRIOT chip."

You TRAITOR! You must just hate the President! Stand behind your country, after all, this is war, and we should give the President all the power he needs to protect Amuhrica!

/bitter sarc


40 posted on 11/04/2006 1:50:56 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (When personal character isn't relevant to voters or party leaders, Foley happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson