Token case.
WalMart has every right to remove him from the property, with the exception of that shopping-mall case in California a few years back, I don't know of any states that will allow someone to protest on commercial property if the owners of that property do not want them there.
Once a decade the ACLU files a brief in support of someone other than an America-hating pedophile. Their real aim is to use the brief as a wedge towards achieving some indirect and nefarious thing they actually want.
Transparent, predictable scum.
They can never make themselves useful. I don't care whose "civil liberties" they're supposedly protecting. To see them shut down would throw me into a full body orgasm.
Any "Christian" who seeks aid from the ACLU is a dupe.
Man, this must have a tough one for the ACLU..."Who do we hate more, Christians or WalMart?"
October surprise.
Two-fer case for the ACLU:
1. Parade Christians as paragons of "hate"
2. Paint WalMart as The Evil One that not only puts Mom-and-Pops out of
business, but also censors "the little guy".
Gawd, I hate 99.999% of what the ACLU does.
Interesting.
Would this be one of the Reverend Phelps' flock?
I thought at first that this was just that once-a-year PR blitz by the athiest Democrat scumbags at the ACLU but on second thought I figure they're purpose in this case is to poke Wal-Mart in the eye.
This ain't about Christianity. It's about smashing Walmart.
The ACLU will take any case when there's a chance of hurting the economy or the social fabric.