WalMart has every right to remove him from the property, with the exception of that shopping-mall case in California a few years back, I don't know of any states that will allow someone to protest on commercial property if the owners of that property do not want them there.
<<< WalMart has every right to remove him from the property, with the exception of that shopping-mall case in California a few years back, I don't know of any states that will allow someone to protest on commercial property if the owners of that property do not want them there. >>>
the Pruneyard Shopping Center case went to the US Supreme Court ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pruneyard_Shopping_Center )
I agree. That was my first thought. He has a right to protest but not on their property. He needs to stay on public property. On the sidewalk adjacent to the parking lot entrance should be fine.
The article --- which is all I have to go on --- didn't say the man was on private property. It said it was "a public place."