Skip to comments.
In the Libby Case, a Grilling to be Remembered
Washington Post ^
| October 27, 2006
| Carol D. Leonnig
Posted on 10/27/2006 2:23:34 PM PDT by MurryMom
With withering and methodical dispatch, White House nemesis and prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald yesterday sliced up the first person called to the stand on behalf of the vice president's former chief of staff.
If I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby was not afraid of the special counsel before, the former Cheney aide, who will face Fitzgerald in a trial beginning Jan. 11, had ample reason to start quaking after yesterday's Ginsu-like legal performance.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: 17; 2007; january
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
To: MurryMom
Another left-wing anti-american Democrat who is living high off of our tax money. There was NO case and he made one up so he could get his name in the paper and make his anti-American Democrat terrorist supporters cheer.
41
posted on
10/27/2006 2:39:33 PM PDT
by
YOUGOTIT
To: The South Texan
42
posted on
10/27/2006 2:40:02 PM PDT
by
MoJoWork_n
(We don't know what it is we don't know)
To: MurryMom
Uh... wait a minute here...
If this expert witness was so clearly shown, by Fitz' withering attack, to have mis-remembered and forgotten all sorts of details...
Doesn't that make Libby's defense look all that much more reasonable? It merely shows that everybody can have moments where you forget about various details, or remember things wrong, or later recall something in clearer detail.
I don't see why that's a crime.
43
posted on
10/27/2006 2:40:44 PM PDT
by
Ramius
To: MurryMom
My God, all the issues such as increased taxes, Pelosi as Speakerette, Supreme Court Judges, pull out of Iraq and the border remaining the joke it is, all these are the issues that the filthy Post refuses to address. Traitors run that rag! Fitz has had a free ride and the President should pardon Libby and see that Armitage is prosecuted, the world is coming to an end with a wimper, not a bang. Where is the investigation on Dirty Harry? Very discouraging that the American people will vote for the Democrat scum because the media pushes their agenda and trashes the GOP.
44
posted on
10/27/2006 2:40:48 PM PDT
by
Rockiette
(Democrats are not intelligent!)
To: MurryMom
Remember the fuss when Slick Willy issued a few pardons before leaving office?He didn't "issue" them. He sold them. People paid Roger Clinton, Hugh Rodham, and an enclave of criminal hasidim paid Hillary in votes after they were pardoned for ripping off federal school funds for decades.
Have the Puerto Rican terrorists Bill pardoned blown up any more cops since they got out? Have the cops they already blew up come back to life yet? Oh well, when Hillary needs the Puerto Rican separatist vote, Bill delivers.
45
posted on
10/27/2006 2:41:14 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: MurryMom
There were several moments when Loftus was completely caught off guard by Fitzgerald, creating some very awkward silences in the courtroom. One of those moments came when Loftus insisted that she had never met Fitzgerald. He then reminded her that he had cross-examined her before, when she was an expert defense witness and he was a prosecutor in the U.S. attorney's office in New York. Libby's defense team declined to comment. Had to get to the end to read this peach...It was worth it.
46
posted on
10/27/2006 2:41:42 PM PDT
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(If a pug barks and no one is around to hear it... they hold a grudge for a long time!)
To: MurryMom
One of those moments came when Loftus insisted that she had never met Fitzgerald. He then reminded her that he had cross-examined her before...I think that just helps Libby prove his point, that memory is not reliable.
47
posted on
10/27/2006 2:41:59 PM PDT
by
expatpat
To: woofie
About 600+ times, including all variations of it. Thing is, I'm astonished that Libby, Rove et. al. haven't figured out how to do that. "I can't remember" is a pretty simple phrase to commit to memory.
48
posted on
10/27/2006 2:42:04 PM PDT
by
kylaka
To: The South Texan; MurryMom; Howlin
Why hasn't Murry Mom been ZOTTED yet? Why should she be? Are we that unsure of ourselves that we cannot allow a voice of dissent among us?
Besides, she's no more aggravating than Howlin'. hehehehehehe
A JOKE,
I was kidding!
Really!
49
posted on
10/27/2006 2:42:20 PM PDT
by
jla
To: MurryMom
Wonder if this writer had a cheerleader outfit on with "FITZ" written across the top as she wrote this amazing piece of.... whatever.
50
posted on
10/27/2006 2:42:35 PM PDT
by
rod1
To: Ramius
She forgot on purpose ...illegal in 15 states
51
posted on
10/27/2006 2:43:09 PM PDT
by
woofie
(If not this war then which one?)
To: San Jacinto
It's kinda like getting something crappy for Fitzmas & after everyone laughs about it, ya just feel like you gotta defend it with everything you have.
To: prion
THE PLAME GAME
Hillary, Libby connected via Marc Rich
But senator slammed Scooter, called his actions 'reprehensible'
WorldNetDaily
Posted: November 3, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
The Concord, N.H., Monitor points out Libby represented Rich during the '80s and '90s. Rich was the target of a 65-count indictment for various crimes, including trading with Iran amid the American hostage crisis and tax evasion. He was convicted in absentia on 51 counts.
Libby reportedly collected $2 million in fees from Rich during the time he represented the financier, who fled the country rather than face the charges.
Around the time of Clinton's 2001 pardon of Rich, his wife, Denise, donated more than $1 million to Democratic causes, including $70,000 to Hillary Clinton's 2000 Senate campaign and $450,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
While Libby denied having any involvement in the pardon, the Monitor reported, he did call Rich Jan 22, 2001, to congratulate him on his good fortune.
"Libby's powerful presence inside the White House his title was assistant to George W. Bush as well as chief of staff to Cheney might help explain why the incoming Bush administration failed to pursue obvious threads of corruption trailing out of President Clinton's pardon of Rich and other dubious figures," the paper conjectured.
Some see Hillary Clinton's denouncement of Libby as more than ironic, since Independent Counsel Robert Ray accused her of giving false testimony during his probe of the White House travel office. In addition, her husband was impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives based in part on a plea bargain deal he made with Ray that included the admission he gave false testimony under oath to a federal grand jury about his relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky.
To: dead
Is this an article or an op ed? Disgusting the support for Fitz on a case that now is about nothing. Plus on cross exam, one should only ask questions that elicit a favorable response for the questioner. Is there any reference to the direct testimony?
Contrast this with how Ken Starr was portrayed as an absolute sicko.
54
posted on
10/27/2006 2:46:33 PM PDT
by
Williams
To: Hendrix
The judge is deciding whether to allow testimony by this "memory doctor". I'm guessing not now.
I like Libby, and hope he gets off, but I do have a disdain for these types of expert witnesses, so I am amused at how she faired in court.
To: expatpat
I think that just helps Libby prove his point, that memory is not reliable.
Great point! Fitz just stepped right in it while he was trying to be clever.
56
posted on
10/27/2006 2:47:51 PM PDT
by
balch3
To: MoJoWork_n
plug "zot" into keyword search.
To: MurryMom
Fitzgerald is also carving up a bunch of Democrats in Chicago--Mayor Daley's cronies.
58
posted on
10/27/2006 2:49:41 PM PDT
by
Brad from Tennessee
(Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
To: San Jacinto
cause I dumb-assed myself with that comment...I meant Fitzgerald but my fingers thought Libby was easier to type.
59
posted on
10/27/2006 2:49:56 PM PDT
by
digger48
To: CharlesWayneCT
I didn't read the whole article, but the expert testimony being permitted has little to do with the expert forgetting a previous examination by Fitz. The issue is whether it is a recognized reliable scientific specialty that is pertinent to an issue in the case and for which the jury needs to hear from an expert. Does the article address any of that?
60
posted on
10/27/2006 2:51:56 PM PDT
by
Williams
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson