Posted on 10/27/2006 6:43:05 AM PDT by scripter
Despite all that their angry-mob front groups argue in front of television cameras to the contrary, radical homosexual activists despise the institution, and more importantly the sanctity, of marriage. That is the fundamental reason why they are seeking to destroy the institution.
This week – dateline Trenton, N.J. – a unified panel of seven judges agreed that illegitimate sexual unions should be made equitable under law to that of monogamous married persons. Without the consent of the governed, these tyrants in black robes sat in judgment of healthy families across the universe and demanded that New Jersey residents accept immoral construction of sexual unions as the equal basis for families and family life in their recreated sexual, liberal utopia.
With utter contempt for God and for the voters of their state, the New Jersey seven unanimously said that all who live in the confines of its borders must fundamentally agree to the moral premise that what the Bible terms perversion the voters should call healthy.
But why? What's the real goal of the activists, the judges and the radicals who seek to subvert a moral worldview?
The answer is simple: No longer satisfied with practicing the unspeakable perverse sexual pleasures that their hearts seek in private bedrooms, they wish to be able to do so in public. They are also suffering from such immense guilt over their sexual behaviors, because they know inherently that the actions they perform are in fact unhealthy, that they will go to any means necessary to try and shut down the voices in their heads that tell them it is wrong.
They wrongfully believe that the guilty voice within them is an echo of a prudish state that seeks to limit their freedoms. They wrongfully believe that the judgment they feel is emanating from "Bible thumpers." And what they fail to admit is that the voice that condemns them the loudest is never a human voice – but in fact the voice of their own conscience informed by the truth of the God who created them.
There are attributes of marriage that same-sex couples will never achieve. But in the minds of radical activists, getting the label and a piece of paper saying so will be close enough.
For instance, a woman who engages in lesbianism will never know the joy of lovemaking that creates within her the product of that union – an actual human life. She will never know the security of a true man protecting her from the dragons of the world and providing for her an environment where she can nurture and give love to that little life once it arrives, or the stamp of approval that God puts on such an experience. And because she and her partner know this, they must defy reason, biology and sexual function to create children and experiences that serve as faulty substitutes for that God-ordained picture.
Likewise, a man who seeks his perverse kicks by depositing the seed of life in, shall we say, non-life-giving cavities, may know orgasm, but never complete union, as he uses anatomy in ways for which the Creator did not create it.
Married couples that love each other and practice monogamous, committed, life-affirming affection – even through tribulation – know a very different experience. A man can learn more about his role as a man because of the way his wife responds to him. Likewise, a woman who has a man who truly loves her for who she is, provides for her needs and encourages her constantly will never even think of finding solutions to those needs elsewhere.
The truth is radical homosexual activists know that these experiences are not theirs for the having. No matter how much they attempt to shut down voices that choose not to support their perverse bedroom habits, even if the entire world agreed with them to their face, they would no be able to escape the voice of their own conscience.
Radical homosexual activists hate biblical marriage, because to achieve its benefits and blessings they must first conform to God's plan for sexuality, and the sinful nature in man is not willing to make such submission and conformity happen. The existence of joyful biblical marriage being practiced by "thumpers" in "Jesusland" infuriates them and thus the only action they can attempt is to destroy the institution that allows for such fundamental societal success.
This sad deception is indicative of the greater truth that mankind is sinful and prefers our own pursuits of carnal pleasure to accepting the reality that there is a God and that we are subject to Him.
But that's OK, because soon there will be a day in Massachusetts and New Jersey where the voters will finally be given back the rights they've had from the beginning to keep the important, vital and joyful union of marriage what it is – a God authorized, designed and established relationship.
So don't believe the angry spokespeople. Radical homosexual activists hate marriage because fundamentally they hate God, and the guilt of both drives them to extremes.
A Gay ( or not! ) Old Time- Gay Marriage links
Questions and Answers: What's Wrong With Letting Same-Sex Couples "Marry?"
FreeRepublic Homosexual Agenda keyword search
HA Ping.
There is a good reason they are called QUEER(S).
Maybe they're "normal" in the judges' eyes....
What I found a little odd is some gays/homosexuals refer to themselves as queer:
Queer By ChoiceNot only do they refer to themselves as queer, but they admit to choosing the gay lifestyle.
I agree-but I also think govt has an obligation to protect, promote, and foster the long term sustainabiity and continuation of society. Hetero marriage is the way society has and should promote its long term sustainability. Hetero marriage has proven to be the most beneficial form of producing, raising, and fostering children. Hetero marriage provides stability to society and has been recognized for millenia as the cornerstone of civilized society.
Gay marriage is not sustainable. it does not produce children. it promotes a lifestyle which is at odds with sustainable society, it promotes a lifestyle which is detrimental to society and erodes the value that society place upon marriage. Gay marriage is simply wrong.
5th paragraph basically distills what I have believed for some time and it's the reason the militancy will never die down.
ewe hit it on the head!
for 96% of them its a choice
choice!
I would blame it on poor parenting, kinda like pets, there are NO bad pets, just bad owners. What goes in is what comes out!
Thanx for the explanation. All this time, I just thought they wanted to get married.
If only loud-mouthed Rosie could read this...
Yes. The TV propaganda piece "Desperate housewives" is a perfect example.
Here we have the left all wrapped up in its frenzy over "gay marriage" desperately trying to show that married heterosexuals are bad.
I saw this thing a few times, essentially to drool over Teri Hatcher and/or Eva Longoria. I turned it off when there was too much murder, evading responsibility, cheating, lying, deceit, meanness, rottenness and greed.
The left is crazy. They don't know the meaning of moderation. They think we are stupid and don't get the point, so they hit us over the head with it too many times.
I got the point: "married heterosexual people are dirt".
It didn't convince me.
They are anarchists? Respect nothing but their own selfish needs? I have seen men with families who suddenly "discover" they are truly "gay" tear up the family, force the kids to accept their "boyfriend" during visitation, make the mom's life a living horror as well as the kids' lives a living mortification. just to satisfy their own need to act like a pervert.
From the queer by choice site. I think Kinsey missed a few days of logic class:
As Alfred Kinsey once said, "The only unnatural sex act is one which you cannot perform." In other words, if Nature, God, or whatever Creator you believe in had not intended for a man to be with a man and for a woman to be with a woman, why would She/He/It have provided all of us with a wide variety of holes and sexual organs that rub up so
pleasurably against all other varieties? If the Creator had wanted to make us all hetero, all the Creator needed to do was stick our glans sexual organs way at the back of deep tunnels and then provide only the opposite sex with tentacles of the proper shape to fit into each other's holes. Instead of doing that, She/He/It put both the penis and the clitoris out in easy reach to be made love to by anyone at all. Hmmm . . . maybe there's a reason for that!
Some people believe the best way to preserve marriage is to return it to the church. That's not my opinion as I'm not sure what effect that would have on our culture.
Hetero marriage has proven to be the most beneficial form of producing, raising, and fostering children.
As I see it, this is a very good point. It's too bad marriage has taken such a hard hit these last few decades.
Gay marriage is not sustainable. it does not produce children. it promotes a lifestyle which is at odds with sustainable society, it promotes a lifestyle which is detrimental to society and erodes the value that society place upon marriage. Gay marriage is simply wrong.
I just wanted to see that again. ;-)
Here is the fifth paragraph:
No longer satisfied with practicing the unspeakable perverse sexual pleasures that their hearts seek in private bedrooms, they wish to be able to do so in public. They are also suffering from such immense guilt over their sexual behaviors, because they know inherently that the actions they perform are in fact unhealthy, that they will go to any means necessary to try and shut down the voices in their heads that tell them it is wrong.That says a lot, doesn't it. IMO, the author wrote a few paragraphs to need to be read over and over.
I think the only reason the homosexual movement wants same sex marriage is to destoy the institution of marriage. It is the only way they can get society's stamp of approval for the way they want to live. Once they get society's approval in the form of government action legalizing same-sex unions, whether they are called marriages or something else, then they will be able to use the cudgel of government coercion to force society to put homosexuality on a par with heterosexuality in every way.
It will only be a short time before public school teachers are mandated by law to teach children that there the difference between homosexuality and heterosexuality is just a very minior technical one and they can find fulfillment in either one.
APA Has No Disagreement With the Treatment of Unwanted Homosexual AttractionWith that news, perhaps more and more gays will get the help they need to leave the lifestyle.
Logic: What's right or wrong? If everyone did it, what would happen?
It has the ring of truth.
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.